I recently posted a review of a provider - India - that I would DEFINITELY consider a GFE. Another poster then questioned the rating as GFE because CBJ was an activity rather than BBBJ. I am not looking to start an argument, but rather open up a discussion.
The question - How much of a "GFE" is contributed by certain variations of the standard activities (e.g. covered vs uncovered, CIM vs non-CIM) a opposed to attitude?
Here is my take on this question - Both are important to me. In this particular case - India- I would definitely consider a GFE because she is skilled AND very personable. You don't feel like just another trick. There is lots of cuddling, kissing, etc. When I am with her there is no rush. She is only comfortable with CBJ, but that was no problem for me - and because of her attitude (and skills!) she can compete with some of the best BBBJCIM. On the other hand, I have seen gals who allow BBBJCIM, but who are definitely NOT GFE in my book (no names here). These gals are more like - "Hey, you blew your wad and I have to run". Hey, I don't have a problem with that - I have seen some of those and have returned. It really depend upon what I am looking for at the time. BTW, not all gals known for BBBJCIM fall into the latter category. For example, I have seen Autumn several times and she does NOT have the"I have to run attitude". Hmmm, I have to see - maybe I could schedule doubles with her and India - that would be fantastic!
So - attitude or activity - what do you other folks think?