http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...d-support.html
all eye could say is wow..... 30 kids???
the guys loaded.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...d-support.htmlDilbert, there is already a thread on this topic @: http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=453012
all eye could say is wow..... 30 kids???
the guys loaded. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
I always wondered about this. In Texas, child support is 20% for the first child and 5% increase for each child under 18 until up until a max of 40%. But what happens in the case of multiple baby mommas? Do they split the max percentage?So after 5 kids, why stop? It's free for him.
The NBA players I represent wanna know. Originally Posted by gnadfly
Odds are he doesn't vote, doesn't care about politics, and never will.Castration goes too far and isn't necessary. The better system is mandatory Norplants for the females, after the first illegitimate baby. No Norplant, no welfare. If they remove the Norplant or refuse the implant. No welfare. The current system pays people to breed out of wedlock babies. It has created a permanent underclass of Democrat voters.
He should have been castrated after he couldn't support child #2 or 3, much less 30. The liberals will say that's cruel, the conservatives will say let the kids starve. A plague on both their houses as both sides try to play this for the votes and really don't give a damn about the people involved. Originally Posted by Old-T
Castration goes too far and isn't necessary. The better system is mandatory Norplants for the females, after the first illegitimate baby. No Norplant, no welfare. If they remove the Norplant or refuse the implant. No welfare. The current system pays people to breed out of wedlock babies. It has created a permanent underclass of Democrat voters. Originally Posted by joe bloeI agree but guys that are irresponsible should be forced to have a vasectomy.