SA reviews?

Can we review people weve met on SA and get credit for it? People can review street walkere, bp girls and the like. Sa is badscially the same.

I would think as long as it meets the requirements for PA credit (fee paid, contact information, happened within 30 days, sufficient ROS, etc.) you would get it.

The downside, of course, is when she finds out you've reviewed her on a hooker site...

ztonk

The downside, of course, is when she finds out you've reviewed her on a hooker site...

ztonk Originally Posted by ztonk

I am guessing that is the point.

My question is how this will play out with current outing rules. In general eccie ad girls, BP ad girls , streetwalkers, etc have all implicitly consented to being an escort. Can the same be said for SA girls? or are they looking for a date, a boyfriend, a fling, etc.

Is the fact that their SA account isn't being directly linked to their possible eccie account enough to circumvent this?

Is a link to an SA profile enough to satisfy the contact info requirement?

What is a SA girl

IB

Of course, ladies from San Antonio are OK to review. Just be sure to enter the review in the San Antonio forums of you saw her there.

:-|

I am guessing that is the point.

My question is how this will play out with current outing rules. In general eccie ad girls, BP ad girls , streetwalkers, etc have all implicitly consented to being an escort. Can the same be said for SA girls? or are they looking for a date, a boyfriend, a fling, etc.

Is the fact that their SA account isn't being directly linked to their possible eccie account enough to circumvent this?

Is a link to an SA profile enough to satisfy the contact info requirement? Originally Posted by Bob McV

Place the review in the Independent forum and mask out everything but the first initial of the name like we do with strippers and I'd say it's all good.

Most are p4p anyway. So its like they are hotter hdh...well most.

What is a SA girl

IB Originally Posted by Iron Butterfly

+1

seeking arrangements I believe

My question is how this will play out with current outing rules. In general eccie ad girls, BP ad girls , streetwalkers, etc have all implicitly consented to being an escort. Can the same be said for SA girls? or are they looking for a date, a boyfriend, a fling, etc. Originally Posted by Bob McV

There is no question that there are ECCIE girls, BP girls and a variety of Pros and semi Pros on the SD sites. Some guys never manage to meet anything other than that type because of their mindsets and how they approach it.

But there are a lot of naive young ladies looking for something else and the information one would have would all be personal in nature and capable of outing them to friends and family.

You can't search SA with a phone number. If a guy meets a lady and reviews her and posts her phone number here then any of her friends and family searching for it will find her presented as a whore here.

Is the fact that their SA account isn't being directly linked to their possible eccie account enough to circumvent this?

Is a link to an SA profile enough to satisfy the contact info requirement? Originally Posted by Bob McV

IF a provider here were reviewed I don't think the issue of having "not linked" the personal to her eccie account will get a guy off the hook. The bottom line will be that she is a member and the guy posted her personal information.


An issue with providing their contact information as a link to their profile is that you are driving people from ECCIE to a subscription site that will cost a gut $70 to join to be able to contact her. That may be a violation of a different ECCIE guideline.



After SB's what next? Do guys start writing reviews of their wives and GFs of the sex they get after buying them some new piece of jewelery?

Why would someone post their number? P4p isnt a whore?

To get PA credit you have to provide contact information of some sort. A lot of the girls on SA use personal email accounts that open their lives up in a manner the avg provider does not. MOst only use their personal phone which also leads back to their personal lives and a link to their seeking arrangement profile only works for a guy willing to spend $70 to join.

IMO the avg gal met on SA is not prepared for the fallout that having her information posted here could create.

Does P4P make a girl a whore? Absolutely. Exchanging cash for sex pretty much attaches the label to the girl. Are they a whore for the rest of their lives? We see a lot of that here on ECCIE. I've known a few that got out of it.

In your OP you claim Seeking Arrangement is like Back Page and ECCIE. I disagree. although there is no shortages of whores that have found their way to Seeking Arrangements there are far more ladies on the site looking for something different.

How many ladies have you contacted on SA that expect to get paid to smile, look pretty be nothing more than arm candy? That is probably the top complaint most guys have and they would say that those girls far outnumber the whores.......

In the middle of those two extremes there are a considerable number of options where you would be hard pressed to label the girl a whore anymore than you would call a civvy date, girl friend or wife a whore.

If you are looking for whores you can find whores most anywhere you go. I've come across maybe 15-20 on SA over the years and steered clear of them except for a couple too hot and cheap to pass up. But I've been out with and slept with many where no cash changed hands or anything of economical value was in play.

How many whores will meet you for dinner, go to a show with you and spend the night without any predetermined compensation in place?

But in the review, you dont have to put their number. Peoplle who arent members of the site can join for free. Everyone knows what the site is about. Money and sex. If you dont want to review people, feel free not to but dont tell others what they should/n't do.

There is no question that there are ECCIE girls, BP girls and a variety of Pros and semi Pros on the SD sites. Some guys never manage to meet anything other than that type because of their mindsets and how they approach it.

But there are a lot of naive young ladies looking for something else and the information one would have would all be personal in nature and capable of outing them to friends and family.

You can't search SA with a phone number. If a guy meets a lady and reviews her and posts her phone number here then any of her friends and family searching for it will find her presented as a whore here.




IF a provider here were reviewed I don't think the issue of having "not linked" the personal to her eccie account will get a guy off the hook. The bottom line will be that she is a member and the guy posted her personal information.


An issue with providing their contact information as a link to their profile is that you are driving people from ECCIE to a subscription site that will cost a gut $70 to join to be able to contact her. That may be a violation of a different ECCIE guideline.



After SB's what next? Do guys start writing reviews of their wives and GFs of the sex they get after buying them some new piece of jewelery? Originally Posted by Whispers

I have to say I am rather surprised when Whispers and I see eye to eye on a topic.

The only two reasons I can see wanting to review someone from a SD site is either revenge or you are desperate for PA credit. If the former surely there is a better way that to brand her a whore on a site that is very well indexed by google. If the later for the price of a single fling you can get life-time access.

Obviously, I can't stop you and the powers that be have already blessed the action. I would just hope before you turn out a gal, she wants the attention.

But in the review, you dont have to put their number. Peoplle who arent members of the site can join for free. Everyone knows what the site is about. Money and sex. If you dont want to review people, feel free not to but dont tell others what they should/n't do. Originally Posted by Congratulations

I would disagree, I would say most people don't think SD sites are about money and sex. For most it is another type dating website. The hook for the gals is its claim to attract men with disposable income looking for something nontraditional and for guys, it claims to attract women seeking older men.

I am not asking not to do anything, I am asking that you consider the impact beyond notching your review count and 6 weeks PA credit.

Unlike the women here or on BP Many of the women on SD sites haven't prepared for the onslaught of hardlegs looking for sex. They post photos and give out e-mails and phone numbers that quickly and effortlessly link to their real identities. Is it fair or just that some co-ed have her life turned upside down because she treated you like a john, and you treated her like a whore? If yes, then by all means review away.