Trump Tells Team He Needs to Be President Again to Save Himself from Criminal Probes

Get out of jail free card?

This dipshit actually figures the best way to stay out of the clink is to be president again... then he can put everybody else in the clink.

How imbecilic! But in a stable, geniuslike way.



https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...-jan6-1384379/

Trump Tells Team He Needs to Be President Again to Save Himself from Criminal Probes
The former president is planning on running for the White House — and away from the law

By ASAWIN SUEBSAENG & ADAM RAWNSLEY

When Donald Trump formally declares his 2024 candidacy, he won’t just be running for another term in the White House. He’ll be running away from legal troubles, possible criminal charges, and even the specter of prison time.

In recent months, Trump has made clear to associates that the legal protections of occupying the Oval Office are front-of-mind for him, four people with knowledge of the situation tell Rolling Stone.

Trump has “spoken about how when you are the president of the United States, it is tough for politically motivated prosecutors to ‘get to you,” says one of the sources, who has discussed the issue with Trump this summer. “He says when [not if] he is president again, a new Republican administration will put a stop to the [Justice Department] investigation that he views as the Biden administration working to hit him with criminal charges — or even put him and his people in prison.”

Presidential immunity and picking his own attorney general aren’t Trump’s only reasons for running again. And as he works on another run, Trump is in a tug-of-war with leaders and operatives of his own party about when to announce, according to multiple people with knowledge of the matter.

The former president is motivated to announce early — even before Election Day 2022 — in the hopes of clearing the field of primary rivals. But GOP leaders, including some of Trump’s closest advisors, don’t want him to declare his intentions until after the midterm elections. The GOP wants to keep voters focused on President Joe Biden, rather than transforming the contest into a referendum on Trump. In recent months, Trump has reluctantly agreed to hold off, only to return shortly thereafter with threats to make an early announcement, either out of self-interest, spite, or some combination of the two.

But as Trump talks about running, the four sources say, he’s leaving confidants with the impression that, as his criminal exposure has increased, so has his focus on the legal protections of the executive branch.

It’s not just liberal wish-casters or Trump critics who are acknowledging the former president’s legal jeopardy. Trump’s teams of lawyers and former senior administration officials speak about it commonly. “I do think criminal prosecutions are possible…for Trump and [former White House chief of staff Mark] Meadows certainly,” Ty Cobb, a former top lawyer in Trump’s White House, bluntly told Rolling Stone late last month.

Trump himself seems to acknowledge potential problems. He “said something like, ‘[prosecutors] couldn’t get away with this while I was president,’” another one of the four sources recalls. “It was during a larger discussion about the investigations, other possible 2024 [primary] candidates, and what people were saying about the Jan. 6 hearings … He went on for a couple minutes about how ‘some very corrupt’ people want to ‘put me in jail.’”

The powers of the presidency would offer a welcome pause to the various civil suits and criminal investigations now hanging over Trump. It’s unclear whether the Justice Department will charge Trump in connection with fomenting the January 6 insurrection, but winning the White House would be extremely helpful to him. Department policy forbids the prosecution of a sitting president, effectively insulating Trump from any federal charges for another four years.

The law is less clear on whether a president can face prosecution from states while in office, but any attempt to put Trump on trial in a state case would likely be litigated in the Supreme Court. Former New York City district attorney Cyrus Vance’s efforts to subpoena Trump’s tax returns landed before the high court in 2020.

At the state level, Trump faces two criminal investigations. In Manhattan, district attorney Alvin Bragg empaneled a grand jury to investigate whether the former president committed fraud by allegedly lying about the value of his assets in financial statements. The grand jury has since expired, however, and there are few indications that Bragg intends to bring charges. In Georgia, prosecutors in Fulton County are investigating whether Trump illegally interfered in the counting of votes by pressuring Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to “find” votes for him after the election. Just this month, Fulton County district attorney Fani Willis has subpoenaed Trump allies Rudy Giuliani and Sen. Lindsay Graham and sent letters to pro-Trump Georgia state senators warning they could be prosecuted as part of the case.

Trump faces a slew of lawsuits, both for his conduct while in office and before. In previous cases Trump’s attorneys have claimed that the office of the president makes him immune to civil suits while sitting. That was Trump’s defense in a since-dismissed lawsuit by former Apprentice contestant Summer Zervos.

In the 1990s, Paula Jones’ suit against then-President Clinton established that presidents do not enjoy absolute immunity. But the Zervos suit against Trump dragged on for five years before she dropped it. The case demonstrated that the presidency can help delay civil suits, even if it’s not an insurmountable obstacle.

Trump’s most recent legal headaches stem from his role in inciting the Jan. 6 insurrection. Capitol and Washington, D.C. Metropolitan police officers have sued Trump over the physical and emotional damages they suffered during the rioting. The former president also faces two separate suits from Democratic members of Congress. The suits accuse the president of violating their civil rights by conspiring with extremist groups such as the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers to prevent the count of electoral votes.

E. Jean Carroll is still pursuing a case against Trump for defamation. She has accused Trump of raping her in a store in the mid 1990s and is suing over his 2019 claim that Carroll was “totally lying.” The Justice Department, under both Trump and Biden, has claimed that Trump is immune from the suit because he was “acting within the scope of his office” when he made the claims. A federal appeals court is currently weighing the department’s arguments.


And in New York, attorney general Letitia James is pursuing a civil investigation into whether the Trump Organization lied about the value of its assets.

The suits add to mounting pressure on Trumpworld as the Jan. 6 committee and Justice Department investigations have heated up. A number of Trump aides have been pulled into a federal grand jury investigation into the effort to overturn Joe Biden’s 2020 election victory. The investigation has yielded search warrants served on Trump campaign attorney John Eastman and Justice Department and former acting assistant attorney general Jeffrey Clark.

In the face of the investigations, many in Trumpworld have hoped that former aides could face prosecution for the efforts to overturn the election instead of the former president. In particular, Trump associates have tried to distance him from Eastman. And as Rolling Stone reported last week Trump’s legal advisors also view former chief of staff Mark Meadows as a potential fall guy for the former president’s post-election activities.

I guess there was a fly on the wall taking down notes, lol. You actually believe this dumb shit stuff?

Good thinking. After 6 years of bogus investigations that came up with bupkis, it’s about time to end their insanity.

... Yet-another Rolling Stone opinion piece full of
journalistic integrity... "Sources say"....

#### Salty

If the republican senate did what they were supposed to do rather than what they thought was good for their pocketbooks and chances for re-election they would have voted for impeachment the second time around. They could have avoided all of this entirely and taken the orange clown out of the picture for good.

If the republican senate did what they were supposed to do rather than what they thought was good for their pocketbooks and chances for re-election they would have voted for impeachment the second time around. They could have avoided all of this entirely and taken the orange clown out of the picture for good. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Precisely.

... Yet-another Rolling Stone opinion piece full of
journalistic integrity... "Sources say"....

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

That's what a lot of people are telling me.

Odd that a dyed in the wool Trumpite would make such a comment.

Remember -- it's a lot easier to ignore Rolling Stone than the POTUS.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...7a0_story.html

Watch this video. Nobody made this shit up.

http://wapo.st/1Yp4zTr

If the republican senate did what they were supposed to do rather than what they thought was good for their pocketbooks and chances for re-election they would have voted for impeachment the second time around. They could have avoided all of this entirely and taken the orange clown out of the picture for good. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

... So Trump was "good for their pocketbooks" and also
good for their "chances of re-election"??

... And yet - here in the forum - liberal lads
tell us that Trump was BAD for the economy and
has no more influence with things.

#### Salty

Good thinking. After 6 years of bogus investigations that came up with bupkis, it’s about time to end their insanity. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Exactly, they couldn't get Trump while he was in Office and they haven't been successful while he's out of Office. So some stupid Liberal putz writes an article in hopes of convincing stupid Liberals that Trump announces to his team that he needs to run again and win to dodge prosecution, lol. Totally ridiculous, besides does Trump have a team, lol.

... To be fair - the Rolling Stone opinion-eers were RIGHT
about something... Trump WILL BE running again.

#### Salty

... So Trump was "good for their pocketbooks" and also
good for their "chances of re-election"??

... And yet - here in the forum - liberal lads
tell us that Trump was BAD for the economy and
has no more influence with things.

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

The point I was making is that by making a deal with Trump and his Big Lie was absolutely a bad short term strategy. If they had impeached his ass like they should have they would have come away looking like responsible and reasonable people concerned with the integrity of the democratic process.

Instead they gave Democrats more ammunition to bludgeon them with about voting rights, gerrymandering, and in some cases suspected treason.

By the way. Trump is not good or bad for the economy. Despite what many think the economy is rarely affected by anything the president does or doesn't do. Trump's influence lies with riling up the republican base. Which is bad for the country because it forces reasonable conservative politicians into crazy statements and positions because otherwise they will fail to win their primaries. That's why we get crazy nutjob candidates running for office like Dr. Oz and Herschel Walker or Marjorie Taylor Greene.

Trump is not good or bad for the economy. Despite what many think the economy is rarely affected by anything the president does or doesn't do.

If the republican senate did what they were supposed to do rather than what they thought was good for their pocketbooks and chances for re-election they would have voted for impeachment the second time around. They could have avoided all of this entirely and taken the orange clown out of the picture for good. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Trump has the distinction of be brought up on more bogus charges than any President in my time, and I have lived through 13 of the,.

Never have the words,……”we have irrefutable evidence” been made more of a mockery of than when spoken by the lying hordes of Democrats who hated President Trump so much.

Trump has the distinction of be brought up on more bogus charges than any President in my time.

Never have the words,……”we have irrefutable evidence” been made more of a mockery of than when spoken by the lying hordes of Democrats who hated President Trump so much. Originally Posted by Jackie S

"Lying hordes of Democrats." My response would be spineless cowardly Republican turds.

Republican Senators know what happened on January 6th. They were there. The January 6 committee, including my not so very favorite person Liz Cheney, have told us and shown us what happened. Very few Republican Senators had the balls to do the right thing. The rest of them bowed down to kiss Trump's ring.

LOL. Some nutters walking around taking selfies isn’t an impeachable offense. The only reason dems are putting on their ridiculous display is because they’re afraid of Trump running again, and how many eyes will be in the ballot boxes this time.