Population Explosion of Bare Beavers?

Every time I read a review or check out a Provider's ad I click on her showcase to get a look (hopefully (and at least) some bare boobies!!) at her and check several categories (yes, boob size, hair color and...).

I've noticed that most of the profiles reflect that the Provider's grooming status is bare. Is it just my hope or are more Providers sporting bare beavers nowadays?

Also, what really constitutes bare? Does the area in question need to be baby smooth or is a hint of stubble acceptable?

Man, my experience is 90% bare or barely a hint of a landing strip. Which is disappointing for me personally as bare homogenizes the beaver. I like some bush! But, appear to be in the deep minority.

I do like the lips competely bare since I enjoy long slow laps outside of the lips, then inside, in and out.....woof!

I happen to like it bare as it makes the dining experience better.

Landing strip or nicely trimmed bush for me please. If I know a provider is completely bare or all natural I will opt for a different provider almost every time.

I kinda like the Kristen Keys kitty looks. The best of both worlds! Now, if she'd only get close enough to give me a chance to sample it.
MM

Man, my experience is 90% bare or barely a hint of a landing strip. Which is disappointing for me personally as bare homogenizes the beaver. I like some bush! But, appear to be in the deep minority. Originally Posted by trojanman

I am completely with you. A little triangle there is like the tip of an arrow, saying "look, a beaver!"

Not that I didn't already know what was there....

I'm a baby boomer and remember what it was like in the 70's to pick hairs out of my teeth while doing DATY. I really like the ladies who shave their twats bare, but a little landing strip is a very sexy touch.

Anyone see a correlation between the sexualization of girls at younger and younger ages and the grooming habits of women? Seems to me that with each passing decade, starting in the 60's and 70's, that the amount of bush decreases as it becomes more and more acceptable to lust after younger and younger ladies/girls in both mainstream media and pornography, to the point where it's now very acceptable/desirable for a woman's 'area' to appear pre-pubescent ?

Just a thought as to maybe why the fur burger is disappearing.

In point of fact I heard that same theory from a LE special investigator. He was dead serious about it. It kinda creeped me out.

Anyone see a correlation between the sexualization of girls at younger and younger ages and the grooming habits of women? Seems to me that with each passing decade, starting in the 60's and 70's, that the amount of bush decreases as it becomes more and more acceptable to lust after younger and younger ladies/girls in both mainstream media and pornography, to the point where it's now very acceptable/desirable for a woman's 'area' to appear pre-pubescent ?

Just a thought as to maybe why the fur burger is disappearing. Originally Posted by UTR ATF

It's coming back. But even in Victorian and Elizabethan eras, there were ladies who "plucked their cunnies" because no lady would have hair in a dirty area. Having pubic hair was considered a trait of the serving and lower levels of society. Don't even ask me why I know that. I've read it in a few different books. Probably some of the old literary porn that I've picked up over the years. And Beatrice Small romance novels (those books are just great, sexy, sometimes nasty and could be considered a skeleton enjoyment in my closet).

It's cyclical. Now? Probably in the next ten years or so, it'll be completely back. No one complains about me being completely natural. Might be surprised, but no complaints.

I like men whether they're shaved or not, but I really do like pubic hair on men. I like hair, period.

Elisabeth

My lips are smooth but I have a small bush of hair on the top...and it is not a landing stripe either....

Anyone see a correlation between the sexualization of girls at younger and younger ages and the grooming habits of women? Seems to me that with each passing decade, starting in the 60's and 70's, that the amount of bush decreases as it becomes more and more acceptable to lust after younger and younger ladies/girls in both mainstream media and pornography, to the point where it's now very acceptable/desirable for a woman's 'area' to appear pre-pubescent ?

Just a thought as to maybe why the fur burger is disappearing. Originally Posted by UTR ATF

Always interesting that we associate lack of pubic hair with little girls, but what about leg and arm pit hair? Nobody ever says that makes them think of children, but it's all part of the same aging process. In fact, most guys in the US can't stand hairy legs or pits on a lady.

Anyone see a correlation between the sexualization of girls at younger and younger ages and the grooming habits of women? Seems to me that with each passing decade, starting in the 60's and 70's, that the amount of bush decreases as it becomes more and more acceptable to lust after younger and younger ladies/girls in both mainstream media and pornography, to the point where it's now very acceptable/desirable for a woman's 'area' to appear pre-pubescent ?

Just a thought as to maybe why the fur burger is disappearing. Originally Posted by UTR ATF

Not at all. Me liking bare kitties or ones with landing strips has absolutely no correlation to any desires or lustful thoughts about younger women. Not AT ALL. Me liking groomed kitties is based on hygiene, odor, and appearance 100%. As far as liking it because it 'looks' pre-pubescent, I don't get down like that.

Can't speak for others, though. I dunno.

I wasn't saying that if you like bareness that you like kids...I was speaking about the trend as a whole on society...kind of a subliminal thing in a way, you can't help it, it's all you see on TV or in the media. Never mind, it was just a thought.