A car ban in the works?

JD Barleycorn's Avatar
http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/la...uring-37-video

A woman driving a car killed one and injuried 37 others in Las Vegas yesterday. The same thing happened in 2005. The president must step up to stop these kind of events with an executive order banning cars.

(I know the dipshits will say that I'm making fun of the dead but we know that is not true. This is a direct comparison between a tragedy caused by a gun and car. Obama said he was going to politicize tragedy and he did)
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Brilliant, as always.

Did you ask Trump for a picture of his JUNK, like you asked me?

SPAM
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 12-21-2015, 09:28 AM
http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/la...uring-37-video

A woman driving a car killed one and injuried 37 others in Las Vegas yesterday. The same thing happened in 2005. The president must step up to stop these kind of events with an executive order banning cars.
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
The lesson you should lean is that you and your right wing friends should quit trying to spend trillions on ISIS and realize that you are way more likely to be killed by a drunk driver than ISIS....do you understand that this undermines your ISIS squealing? . We should ban ignorant fucks like you from oxygen is wtf we should do.

Fucking assholes like you and IFFy that think you are conservatives yet are willing to spend others money on security from something that is less likely to harm you than a lightening strike!
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/la...uring-37-video

A woman driving a car killed one and injuried 37 others in Las Vegas yesterday. The same thing happened in 2005. The president must step up to stop these kind of events with an executive order banning cars.

(I know the dipshits will say that I'm making fun of the dead but we know that is not true. This is a direct comparison between a tragedy caused by a gun and car. Obama said he was going to politicize tragedy and he did) Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Very good. So knowing that car accidents kill more people than guns, why don't you stop driving?

A handgun is for one primary purpose -- to kill. About 8,500 times a year in the U.S. A car's primary purpose is to transport people from one location to another. How many times was a car used to kill? Probably less than 100 times a year.

And we do many things to keep a car out of the hands of those who are unskilled to use it as meant. Age restrictions. Driving tests. Car registration (which cost). Licenses (which cost).

It is very doubtful that Obama will get any gun control legislation through Congress in the next year. Simply too much opposition to it in Congress.
http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/la...uring-37-video

A woman driving a car killed one and injuried 37 others in Las Vegas yesterday. The same thing happened in 2005. The president must step up to stop these kind of events with an executive order banning cars.

(I know the dipshits will say that I'm making fun of the dead but we know that is not true. This is a direct comparison between a tragedy caused by a gun and car. Obama said he was going to politicize tragedy and he did) Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Was she a poor loser? Ban gambling.
southtown4488's Avatar
dumb
You guys can bicker about this story all you want. I am sorry too many things wrongs with this story. It stinks to high heaven.

Jim

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/12/21...gas-strip.html
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 12-21-2015, 10:22 AM
Was she a poor loser? Ban gambling. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Probably a Miss Columbia supporter. Ban the Miss Universe Contest.
Probably a Miss Columbia supporter. Ban the Miss Universe Contest. Originally Posted by WTF
Ban the contest or at least get an MC that can fucking read.
https://youtu.be/v8kR6_PhiNc


Jim
Guest123018-4's Avatar
It is sad that there are those that use firearms in the commission of criminal acts so the response is to punish those that do not commit criminal acts with firearms by taking them away or restricting them from law abiding citizens.

The way the liberal left looks at things, we should have banned aircraft even before 9114 a that would have saved thousands of lives in just that one action. Had we banned trucks before Oklahoma City just think of the number of lives that would have saved.

I will keep my firearms regardless of what laws the left can get passed and will be willing to use them to defend this nation from attack or for any other defense deemed necessary.
Ban the contest or at least get an MC that can fucking read.
https://youtu.be/v8kR6_PhiNc


Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
Mebbe he should have asked to borrow his " homey " odummer's teleprompter !
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
Very good. So knowing that car accidents kill more people than guns, why don't you stop driving?

A handgun is for one primary purpose -- to kill. About 8,500 times a year in the U.S. A car's primary purpose is to transport people from one location to another. How many times was a car used to kill? Probably less than 100 times a year.

And we do many things to keep a car out of the hands of those who are unskilled to use it as meant. Age restrictions. Driving tests. Car registration (which cost). Licenses (which cost).

It is very doubtful that Obama will get any gun control legislation through Congress in the next year. Simply too much opposition to it in Congress. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

A guns primary purpose is to fire a projectile, period. It is up to the holder of the weapon on where that bullet goes. Your entire premise is wrong.

How many times is a car used to kill INTENTIONALLY? How about adding in the accidents and mishandling like that crappy statistic that keeps floating back to the top.

Yep, we restrict ownership and use of cars (unless you're an illegal) but cars kill many more people than do guns and it is not even a right.

Yes, there is going to be more to this story.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 12-21-2015, 03:01 PM
It is sad that there are those that use firearms in the commission of criminal acts so the response is to punish those that do not commit criminal acts with firearms by taking them away or restricting them from law abiding citizens. Originally Posted by The2Dogs
The government restricts cars in the name of safety...they restrict your movements from one country to another. I wish you gun lovers would get up in arms about the government restrictions on abortion. Then i could truly get behind your small government movement.
The government restricts cars in the name of safety...they restrict your movements from one country to another. I wish you gun lovers would get up in arms about the government restrictions on abortion. Then i could truly get behind your small government movement. Originally Posted by WTF
How are cars being restricted?

Jim
LexusLover's Avatar
A guns primary purpose is to fire a projectile, period. It is up to the holder of the weapon on where that bullet goes. Your entire premise is wrong. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
One can tell he knows nothing about the use of a firearm for self-defense.

Now, if I am hunting game animals for sport or food, I want to kill the game animal.

It's easier to prepare the animal for cooking if it is already dead. (sarcasm alert!)

While posting I just realized why he's afraid of firearms ... he might kill himself with one.