WH INTIMIDATION OF THE PRESS CONTINUES......

"Lanny Davis, and Obama supporter, said this morning on WMAL radio that the Washington Times editor was threatened with restricted access or possible revocation of access to White House officials if they kept running his column, a column White House officials apparently didn’t like."

From WAL radio this am:

The Obamatons would have you believe the Woodward threat was a one-off; NOT TRUE !

The Obamatons would have you believe the Woodward threat was a one-off; NOT TRUE ! Originally Posted by Whirlaway

It's fun to watch the White House's reaction to Bob Woodward pointing out that Obama is a liar. It just shows the extent to which Obama is supported by main stream media. Obama lies routinely and MSM says nothing.

The only voices that point out Obama's lies have been discredited as right wing nuts. When Fox News or talk radio accuses Obama of lying, he just laughs it off. When liberal icon Bob Woodward says he's lying, it's not so easy to dismiss. Imagine a thousand Bob Woodwards in MSM pointing Obama's lies. If MSM was the watchdog it's supposed to be, Obama wouldn't be able to lie and the country's future would be far brighter.

Is anybody really shocked? The press got daddy Obama elected. Now they are just as stuck as we are with his cradle to grave "protection" and America-changing daddiness.

Anyone who believes this guy WAS NOT ORDERED from the top, needs to back away from the bong your sucking on, and go back to sucking oscumbos dick.

LOL...The liberal press gets Obama elected! You guys are to funny. The so called liberal press got walked all over by the Bush admin in the build up to the Iraq war.

When are you numbnuts going to learn that politics is a big boy sport and the press is in it to make a buck.

If you don't believe me, ask Woodwards publisher.

LOL, you have got to be KIDDING ME! The press came all over Obama. I'm sure it had more to do with electing the first black president than the bullshit philosophical and meaningless mantra Hope and Change.

I'm going to go back to discussing something less close to the heart of disciples like religion in that other thread.

LOL...The liberal press gets Obama elected! You guys are to funny. The so called liberal press got walked all over by the Bush admin in the build up to the Iraq war.

When are you numbnuts going to learn that politics is a big boy sport and the press is in it to make a buck.

If you don't believe me, ask Woodwards publisher. Originally Posted by WTF

It looks like Woodward is sticking to his story.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/50988772

When are you numbnuts going to learn that politics is a big boy sport and the press is in it to make a buck. Originally Posted by WTF

Obviously the Founding Fathers felt a little differently or they wouldn't' have made Freedom of the Press part of the Bill of Rights.

LOL, you have got to be KIDDING ME! The press came all over Obama. I'm sure it had more to do with electing the first black president than the bullshit philosophical and meaningless mantra Hope and Change.

I'm going to go back to discussing something less close to the heart of disciples like religion in that other thread. Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

Had Clinton gotten elected...folks would be claiming the exact same thing about the press with her.

I bitched about the kid glove treatment Bush got in 2000.

The fact is, the loser like to place blame on others. In this case the press.

My point is the press is in it to make money and therefore give the mass wtf they want. The masses wanted Bush in 2000 and 2004 (well not 2000 lol) and Obama in 08 and 2012.

I find it funny how the losers bitch. Hell I did it in 2000. I thought the press did not point out how Bush got the majority of his fortune from the tax payers in the Texas Ranger deal.

At the end of the day, the masses weren't that interested so the press did not drumbeat it.

If the press seems to like Obama (or hate him) it is because they are marketing to their revenue source. They want viewers.

But if you want to blame the press to feel better...continue to do so. Ignore that they are a business.

Had Clinton gotten elected...folks would be claiming the exact same thing about the press with her. Originally Posted by WTF

Probably.

I bitched about the kid glove treatment Bush got in 2000. Originally Posted by WTF

Bush didn't get kid glove treatment, Gore just sucked. After 9/11 the "War on Terror" got the kid glove treatment not W. I hated W.

The fact is, the loser like to place blame on others. In this case the press.

My point is the press is in it to make money and therefore give the mass wtf they want. The masses wanted Bush in 2000 and 2004 (well not 2000 lol) and Obama in 08 and 2012.

I find it funny how the losers bitch. Hell I did it in 2000. I thought the press did not point out how Bush got the majority of his fortune from the tax payers in the Texas Ranger deal.

At the end of the day, the masses weren't that interested so the press did not drumbeat it.

If the press seems to like Obama (or hate him) it is because they are marketing to their revenue source. They want viewers.

But if you want to blame the press to feel better...continue to do so. Ignore that they are a business. Originally Posted by WTF

I disagree; Daddy Obama was their dream-boat. Now they're stuck with him like the rest of us are. I think the limmited coverage of his non-decision making and continual fuck ups and massive coverage of pro-Democrat / Daddy agenda is just to cover up their abysmal mistake in 2008.