Back back only provider

Saw a ad while viewing escort sites, and saw a provider ad that was fully bareback friendly , with creampie, with no birth control and pregancy risk advertised as a extra,
All I could think was WTF !!!!!
anyone else ever seen anything like it before

I'd call it a troll ad, designed to get people talking. Seems to have worked.

I'd call it a troll ad, designed to get people talking. Seems to have worked. Originally Posted by Chica Chaser

It's a real ad not a troll ad at all. it's on adult works you can google creampie kristy
I guess if it was on here it would be under the Another Realm Forum after reading some of the things in there, nothing should surprise me.

Ashley Cummz - Read her profile... ijs

Ashley Cummz - Read her profile... ijs Originally Posted by ElamEno

Thought I recognized her though. She's pornstar Madelyn Monroe and apparently her bbfs is $900/hr. That's what I found anyways *shrugs*

Still sometimes it behooves me. Some of these gents will swear off a provider doing bbfs saying she has a "death wish" (which I agree that she does), but then will jump on the chance to bang a porn star bareback (I have read many many discussions on it). I don't get it...does anyone else see the disconnect or is it just me? Anyways rhetorical question back to my corner.

BBFS girls can do whatever they want, no skin off my nose. But I will not accept them as a reference and will not see clients of theirs (if I find out) either. Good day.

Back back, gimme 50 feet.....

I've seen this on Backpage. Forget where. I was bored and just looking at random BP ads from different areas. Came across one where the girl actually wanted a guy to be her baby daddy. What fool would pay a girl to fuck her and then possibly 9 months later be on the hook for 18 years worth of payments?

It's a real ad not a troll ad at all. it's on adult works you can google creampie kristy
I guess if it was on here it would be under the Another Realm Forum after reading some of the things in there, nothing should surprise me. Originally Posted by dreamvacationdates

Well maybe its not, but the effect is the same. It gets her some attention.

Back back, gimme 50 feet..... Originally Posted by BBW Katrina

A little further.....that's it.....

Still sometimes it behooves me. Some of these gents will swear off a provider doing bbfs saying she has a "death wish" (which I agree that she does), but then will jump on the chance to bang a porn star bareback (I have read many many discussions on it). I don't get it...does anyone else see the disconnect or is it just me? Anyways rhetorical question back to my corner.

BBFS girls can do whatever they want, no skin off my nose. But I will not accept them as a reference and will not see clients of theirs (if I find out) either. Good day. Originally Posted by Karyn Lovely

Karyn, the disconnect you mentioned between guys swearing off a provider who does bbfs and then jump at the chance to bbfs with a pornstar is actually quite easy to see. When it comes to a legit, big name pornstar who fucks on the side, most guys make 2 assumptions. 1) the girl is constantly tested and knows she is clean. 2) her price for bbfs is so high, her clients are high caliber ( like himself) and must therefore also be clean (again-- like himself).

Karyn, the disconnect you mentioned between guys swearing off a provider who does bbfs and then jump at the chance to bbfs with a pornstar is actually quite easy to see. When it comes to a legit, big name pornstar who fucks on the side, most guys make 2 assumptions. 1) the girl is constantly tested and knows she is clean. 2) her price for bbfs is so high, her clients are high caliber ( like himself) and must therefore also be clean (again-- like himself). Originally Posted by Cpalmson

but you see thats the rub, the other people she performs with are tested also and had to show their test results to work, while a client doesn't so that negates any assumption that she will be clean if your not the first one, the minute she has sex with someone who isn't recently tested, then your assumptions are just a wild ass guess, your averages are better but not 100%,
it's the time between testing for video work that will get you.
also being able to pay her rates dosen't make someone high caliber, it just means you can pay her rates.

No thanks.

but you see thats the rub, the other people she performs with are tested also and had to show their test results to work, while a client doesn't so that negates any assumption that she will be clean if your not the first one, the minute she has sex with someone who isn't recently tested, then your assumptions are just a wild ass guess, your averages are better but not 100%,
it's the time between testing for video work that will get you.
also being able to pay her rates dosen't make someone high caliber, it just means you can pay her rates. Originally Posted by dreamvacationdates

You are saying the same thing as I am. Those that want to BBFS w/ a known pornstar are making huge ASSUMPTIONS. That's my point. These are assumptions that can't be verified, so by making the assumption, one is essentially "hoping for the best". Therein is the problem. One should never assume. If they do, it should be the worst case assumption.

Karyn, the disconnect you mentioned between guys swearing off a provider who does bbfs and then jump at the chance to bbfs with a pornstar is actually quite easy to see. When it comes to a legit, big name pornstar who fucks on the side, most guys make 2 assumptions. 1) the girl is constantly tested and knows she is clean. 2) her price for bbfs is so high, her clients are high caliber ( like himself) and must therefore also be clean (again-- like himself). Originally Posted by Cpalmson

Ahh I see where the misconception comes into play..thanks Cpalmson. You know, for some reason every time I see your avatar I pronounce your name as "captain palminson" in my mind. I have no idea why lol sorry for the random tangent...