I wrote a review but I didn't get PA credit, is it visible to others?

I know I didn't get PA credit for my review of Rosy. I shared all the detail I cared to and I am 100% fine with the consequences (i.e. no PA cred).

Q: Is this review visible to others?

Thanks,
-- Chris

PS: I checked Rosy's profile about an hour or so after I got the PM turning me down for PA cred and Rosy had no tab for reviews at the time (she should have had one because a mod already reviewed my post and ruled on whether or not I deserved PA credit for it). The review has NOT been removed (I can see it when I go on the Inde review section), so I was just curious about reviews and how long they took to get attached to the appropriate lady.

I know I didn't get PA credit for my review of Rosy. I shared all the detail I cared to and I am 100% fine with the consequences (i.e. no PA cred).

Q: Is this review visible to others?

Thanks,
-- Chris

PS: I checked Rosy's profile about an hour or so after I got the PM turning me down for PA cred and Rosy had no tab for reviews at the time (she should have had one because a mod already reviewed my post and ruled on whether or not I deserved PA credit for it). The review has NOT been removed (I can see it when I go on the Inde review section), so I was just curious about reviews and how long they took to get attached to the appropriate lady. Originally Posted by saintsFanChris

It's visible to me. Including TROTS.

It's going to be interesting for you now; based on past experience, I think that if you didn't get PA you're not going to see any "Private" comments anyone makes on the review. And if anyone's referencing anything you wrote in TROTS they have to put that material in "Private" tags, so it's possible that you'll miss out on some things being said.

I'll leave it to staff to answer your other questions.

Cheers,

bcg

SFC:

It is visible to everyone. What I need to do now is assign it to Rosy's profile, which I will do shortly. I usually assign reviews a couple times a day, one of those times is right about now.

Thanks for posting the review and for your concern for Rosy. It was a positive review, and I suspect it will draw the attention of other guys.

JaG

Thanks for posting the review and for your concern for Rosy. It was a positive review, and I suspect it will draw the attention of other guys. Originally Posted by JustaGuyinMS

Oh, definitely.

A lot of guys here are leery of taking the risk that they could take one for the team* when they see an unreviewed lady. Just the fact that someone here has seen her and has let them know that they probably won't have a bad experience will push a lot of guys off the fence about seeing her.

Cheers,

bcg

* Semantic nit: It's not "taking one for the team" when you see an unreviewed lady. It's only "taking one for the team" if you see an unreviewed lady and have a bad time. Get the terminology right! (This is one of bcg's pet peeves.**)

** "I don't have 'pet peeves'. I have major psychotic fuckin' hatreds." --George Carlin

The comments about how she put her time with me OVER answering her phone and the other thing(s) I mentioned, were things that I think are need to know about a provider.

BCG: I looked and I can still see the private data for **MY** review (and no one else's). I think that means I could follow any discussion thread fully.

The comments about how she put her time with me OVER answering her phone and the other thing(s) I mentioned, were things that I think are need to know about a provider. Originally Posted by saintsFanChris

At the risk of offending against the rules, I did see that; I'm sure others w/PA can too. [JaG (or vic, if you're around--haven't seen you since I got back), if that's violating the "don't reveal TROTS" rule please edit "Private" tags in here.]

BCG: I looked and I can still see the private data for **MY** review (and no one else's). I think that means I could follow any discussion thread fully. Originally Posted by saintsFanChris

Meaning you can see your TROTS? That's as should be. What I'm worried about is this...

A while ago I responded to a review; since I was quoting (or at least paraphrasing) TROTS I put my comments in "Private" tags. Shortly after that I got a PM from the reviewer asking about my comments; after trading a couple PMs it was clear that he seemed unable to see my "Private" comments (at the time we exchanged PMs he hadn't gotten PA for that review; I can't recall if he ever did or if that review just wasn't PA worthy).

I'm going to go back to that thread in a few minutes, and make a relevant posting with "Private" tags incorporated in them. Let me know (here, there, or via PM) whether you can see the "Private" comments. We'll nail this sucker down!

Cheers,

bcg (experimental scientist at heart)

I've got no problem with the comments about the phone being public - it's the dirty details that need to remain private.

JaG

PS: BCG - I'm here!

I've got no problem with the comments about the phone being public - it's the dirty details that need to remain private.

JaG

PS: BCG - I'm here! Originally Posted by JustaGuyinMS

That's a very rational position and that is why I worded my posts about her on this thread as I did. Keep of the good work JaG (and vic).

PS: BCG - I'm here! Originally Posted by JustaGuyinMS

I know you are, but I haven't seen vic since I've been back from hiatus.

Cheers,

bcg

I know you are, but I haven't seen vic since I've been back from hiatus.

Cheers,

bcg Originally Posted by bluffcityguy

Hey BCG - my board time has been extremely curtailed lately, due to a variety of ongoing issues, which will continue for at least a few more weeks. Sorry for not responding to things in a timely manner!

Hey BCG - my board time has been extremely curtailed lately, due to a variety of ongoing issues, which will continue for at least a few more weeks. Sorry for not responding to things in a timely manner! Originally Posted by vicinms

I understand Ongoing Issues; I just got back from a six week hiatus myself (My Inconsiderate Employer thinking that what I do for it is more important than being a good role model for the riff-raff here).

While you've been unavoidably detained, your unindicted co-conspirator here (JaG) has been minding the store, so I wasn't complaining about things being neglected. Just wondering where you were and how you're doing. Now I know.

Cheers,

bcg