Obama Re-Election Prompts Middle East War

Obama Re-Election Prompts Middle East War






by David Corn15 Nov 2012
It is impossible not to notice the timing of this week’s incipient Middle East regional war. It comes approximately one week after Barack Obama was re-elected to the presidency. Last Tuesday, Obama won re-election; four days later, Hamas began firing rockets on Israel’s southern cities in a new wave. The day after that, Syria began shelling Israeli positions in the north. And two days after that, the Palestinian Authority told the press that they would be making another bid for statehood at the United Nations; the same day, riots began in Jordan over gas price increases.


The region is descending into war because of weakness in the White House – but also because each of the regional players, with the exception of Israel and the current Jordanian and Turkish governments (both of them have been silent), has an interest in war. Obama’s empty chair foreign policy has incentivized virtually every anti-American regime in the region into greater aggressiveness. Now Obama is attempting to stuff the genie back into the bottle by issuing statements of support for Israel. But it’s too little too late.

Here’s how the various players break down:

Hamas. Hamas’ goal here is simple, Now that President Obama has been re-elected – and knowing what they do about Obama’s dislike of the Jewish State – Hamas wants to take the opportunity to forge its international alliances more strongly. That means shoring up its relationship with Iran and Egypt especially. Iranian Revolutionary Guard figures are reportedly helping Hamas arm and fire its rockets; Egypt is sending its Prime Minister to the Gaza Strip to show solidarity. At the same time, Hamas is attempting to stop the Palestinian Authority from garnering the sympathy of the other Arab states with its incipient UN bid, since Hamas and the PA are effectively at war. This newest conflict gives Hamas the public relations upper hand over the supposedly more moderate PA (which is somewhat like calling the Mensheviks the more moderate communists).



Palestinian Authority. The Palestinian Authority wants to see how far it can push President Obama; that’s why they’re pursuing statehood unilaterally, in violation of all prior agreements. The truth is that Palestinian statehood will not solve any of the problems between the Arabs and Israel; it will merely exacerbate them, since the Palestinian Authority will immediately use its newfound statehood to call for control of the West Bank borders, jacked up militarization, and a split of Jerusalem. The new war in Gaza provides the Palestinian Authority with an excuse for statehood – they can now claim, however implausibly, that the peace process has failed, and they must move now.

Egypt. Egypt has been looking to violate the Camp David Accords ever since American ally Hosni Mubarak was ousted in favor of the Muslim Brotherhood. Now they get their chance. Ignoring all American calls to the contrary, Egypt is siding publicly with Hamas, sending its Prime Minister and intelligence chief there to show support. Already, insiders in the Egyptian parliament are calling for an end to the Egypt-Israel treaty.

Syria. Israel has long feared that a wounded Bashar Assad regime in Syria would turn south, trying to provoke Israel into war in order to unify the competing Syrian factions into an anti-Israel force. Now that’s happened. Assad was on the brink in Syria (not that his replacements will be any better); he is attacking Israel from the north even as Hamas attacks from the South. In doing so, he buys credibility with his own people and continued support from Iran.

Iran. Iran wants all attention off its nuclear program. Iran has routinely used terrorist groups surrounding Israel as a proxy; Iran’s pitch to the regional Muslims is that should
they go nuclear, they will be able to fight Israel to death in a war of attrition in which nuclear deterrence prevents Israel from saving itself. Meanwhile, while the world focuses on Israel striking back at Hamas in Gaza, it ignores Iran’s continued moves toward nuclear proliferation.

Jordanian Opposition. The current turmoil in Gaza has taken focus off of a Palestinian uprising in Jordan. Jordan has long been Israel’s only quiet border. Now the 70% Palestinian population of Jordan threatens to overthrow the current regime, turning Jordan into yet another Islamist state bent on Israel’s destruction. Were Jordan’s Hashemite kingdom to fall, Jordan would surely attempt to forge a strong alliance with the Palestinian Authority and Hamas – and could even try to annex that territory.

Lebanon. Hezbollah-run Lebanon couldn’t be happier about the current conflict. In many ways, Israel’s 2000 evacuation of southern Lebanon paved the way for today’s conflict; each time Israel has pulled out from territory, terrorist groups in the region have sensed weakness and attacked. Now southern Lebanon is a terrorist stronghold. Watch for Hezbollah to launch an assault on northern Israel the moment Israel puts boots on the ground in Gaza.

Turkey. Turkey is the only enemy of Israel sorry to see this happen. That’s because Turkey supports the Syrian opposition, and Syria is taking part in a war against Israel. That puts Turkey in the awkward position of opposing Assad but supporting a war against Israel. So far, they’re not stepping into the breach – especially not when NATO is considering defense of Turkey over Syrian aggression.


Saudi Arabia. Saudia Arabia, having been assured by the Obama administration that Israel will eventually be forced into concessions, is happy to sit on the sidelines and wait. They don’t want to encourage Hamas or the Muslim Brotherhood openly, lest the royal family be overthrown in the style of Egypt or potentially Jordan.


Conflict in the Middle East is nothing new. But this multipronged conflict is truly the first transnational effort against Israel since the 1973 Yom Kippur War. It’s been brought on by Barack Obama’s embrace of the Arab Spring, his gap with Israel, and his failure to stand up to Islamism. Israel’s enemies believe that Israel stands alone, no matter what words the State Department mouths. And so the rockets will continue falling.
Wow this is breaking news!! And to think just three weeks ago everyone in the middle east where giving each other flowers and butterfly kisses. Shocking.
Interesting piece .
Interesting piece by David Corn of MotherJones....Corn is a hard leftie, but one of the honest ones apparently. Originally Posted by Whirlaway
Corn didn't write that article. It's BreitDead bullshit. As usual, Choom is a lying fucking douchebag. Now, he's even inserting fake author names on articles to disguise that fact that his sources are just Breitbart propaganda and lies, with no credibility.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2...iddle-East-War
Choom is the boards lesbian...
Corn didn't write that article. It's BreitDead bullshit. As usual, Choom is a lying fucking douchebag. Now, he's even inserting fake author names on articles to disguise that fact that his sources are just Breitbart propaganda and lies, with no credibility.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2...iddle-East-War Originally Posted by wimpage
Dead guys don't write, they only vote dimwit! When did Corn start writing for Breitbart?

HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!
Choom is the boards lesbian... Originally Posted by BIG GAY

LOL!
Dead guys don't write, they only vote dimwit! When did Corn start writing for Breitbart?

HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! Originally Posted by ChoomCzar
Ben Shapiro wrote the article, moron.
Ben Shapiro wrote the article, moron. Originally Posted by wimpage

So what? You aren't going to read it regardless of who wrote it because liberals don't read....they just believe what their owners tell them to believe......
It's sad you had to alter the author of the article to feign it has some legitimacy. Otherwise you wouldn't have felt compelled to do so.
It's sad you had to alter the author of the article to feign it has some legitimacy. Otherwise you wouldn't have felt compelled to do so. Originally Posted by SkylarCruzWantsYou

No. Liberals only believe what their slave masters tell them to believe....they don't think, but they only FEEL.....the only fundamental transformation you can inflict on liberals is to change how they feel....they are to be ridiculed and mocked....I apply Saul Alinsky techniques to the conservative cause.......

BTW: you didn't read the article, did you? If you claim to have read it, then you should be able to summary the main point of the article in one sentence in the next 2.5 minutes...I'll be back later to grade you if you dare take this test....
Like I said before, if it's valid- there is no need to change the author. Seems like you just have extra time on your hands and spend it being immature and manipulative.
Fast Gunn's Avatar
Thanks for breaking it down for the swine, Skylar.

Some of these dummies are ready to smear President Obama with any convenient paint brush they find.

. . . Maybe you'll need to explain to them how Romney lost the race.




Wow this is breaking news!! And to think just three weeks ago everyone in the middle east where giving each other flowers and butterfly kisses. Shocking. Originally Posted by SkylarCruzWantsYou
No. Liberals only believe what their slave masters tell them to believe....they don't think, but they only FEEL.....the only fundamental transformation you can inflict on liberals is to change how they feel....they are to be ridiculed and mocked....I apply Saul Alinsky techniques to the conservative cause.......

BTW: you didn't read the article, did you? If you claim to have read it, then you should be able to summary the main point of the article in one sentence in the next 2.5 minutes...I'll be back later to grade you if you dare take this test.... Originally Posted by ChoomCzar
Why would anybody waste time reading anything you post up, you stupid fucking douchebag? Your posts are a blight on this board. Immature, irresponsibly untrue and filled with your ridiculous blather. Do us all a favor and fuck off.
Why would anybody waste time reading anything you post up, you stupid fucking douchebag? Your posts are a blight on this board. Immature, irresponsibly untrue and filled with your ridiculous blather. Do us all a favor and fuck off. Originally Posted by wimpage

"Exhibit A"......see what I mean about liberals guided by their feelings rather than their thoughts......wimp-age hates me, so he doesn't read what I post......

Skylar, you ex-Choomcumdumpster you, you need to read an article before claiming it's not legitimate.......LOL!


how do intelligent people function?....intelligent people always read the articles and watch the shows of people they disagree with....they are always testing their beliefs to ensure they are correct....intelligent people will change their beliefs if they discover their belief is incorrect.....

Do Skylar, wimpage, marksucksnycox and Fast Goon sound like intelligent people to you? Of course not! Otherwise, they would read the article, think about it, then agree or disagree with it supported by logical arguments.......people like them deserve to be mocked and ridiculed.....their purpose for being here is just to fuck around....they're kkklowns and asswipes......