Encounter: Margo

User ID: -
Date: 11-04-22
Name: Margo
Phone: (337)366-0159
Email Address: -
URL / Website: https://lafayette-la.skipthegames.co...e/606841762629. https://tryst.link/escort/mesmerizingmargo (Removed link The Dr)
City: Lafayette
State: Louisiana
Address: Of pinhock
Activities: See ROS
Hair Length and Color: Long brunette hair
Age: 40's
Smoking Status: Smoker
Ethnic Background: White/Caucasian
Physical Description: She looks just like her pictures and pornhub
Recommendation: Yes

Awesome review

You can have her

what is her porn hub url

What the Hell? I just noticed the Ban Hammer dropped...

* edit.

Being as we have a very sensitive Mod, I decided to delete comment before I get the Ban Hammer too.

While I never would go see any of Loverlove’s dates, and that certainly include Margo after his review, I do not see anything in his review that would warrant a ban. It could be unrelated to his review, but certain moderators can be very subjective and creative with rules

Sensitive, Subjective and creative...I have a few better than that...lol

Sabbathrose I believe?

Not sure as I just saw this but swing the edit I’m wondering if he linked pron

I believe he linked her pornhub. I have no idea if there were warnings or messages. I’d hope so and I’d hope this wasn’t the first incident.

Having a new overzealous mod encouraging posters to delete their account is going to kill this site.

It was probably a pornhub link LoverLove posted in his review, and he likely got points for it. It could have earned him a ban if he already had accumulated points.

I got pointed for a link to my review on OH2 , same as on Eccie, except it had a few PG rated pictures, no nudes or sex, and a link to a PG rated video clip the provider had posted on Twitter. My post was removed because the mod said the post was promoting the provider with those links, although they did not point to any ads. Guess I can accept that explanation to some extent.
Then in addition, after one comment from handle rfl the mod closed the thread with the review. I asked for an explanation in a pm, but have not received a reply.

My guess is it’s the same reason the first one was removed. With or without the links, the review was considered a promotion.

Well, aren’t all YES reviews in some sense promoting a provider? If a review is approved for PA credit it follows the rules. By closing a review no other members can comment or publicly ask a questions. It is not a very useful approach

I get rules are rules, I just hope there were other incidents and it wasn’t a ban for one link. I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt, just hope it’s right. I wouldn’t have even questioned this a couple of years ago. But with the overzealous policing we currently have, all bets are off.