See the part where I said etc? That means including more than the names that were written. I'm well aware that there are more than two reputable providers. Thanks though.
Originally Posted by yolo99
We agree then that there are enough reliable providers to meet anyone’s tastes and budget, so that would not be a problem, as you had originally stated.
Also did u notice the part where I said I value my privacy? I didn't just mean my real life identity. I actually specifically meant online identity as well. I don't necessarily want anyone to be able to match my hobby phone with a face as well as an online identity.
Originally Posted by yolo99
Reliable ladies are just as concerned with privacy, if not more so. Their reputation and possibly their livelihood depends on being trustworthy. So while privacy is a concern for everyone, it's not something one needs to worry about,
if they are seeing reputable ladies. If one only sees the unreliable, fly by night BP types, then of course trustworthiness should be actively worried about.
I also stated right at the beginning, I have no idea if the poster Karl or whatever his name is, is legit or not. All I was pointing out is that the method suggested isn't necessarily a good one, for the reasons above. That's it.
Originally Posted by yolo99
The reasons mentioned were not valid. By the way, defending someone who could at best be a likely phony, and at worst may be a criminal does nothing for one’s own trustworthiness on this board. It does not improve the standing of the person in question, but may diminish the reputation of the person defending them. Please continue though, if you like.