State Department Reiterates Call for 'Inclusive' Taliban Government

  • oeb11
  • 08-16-2021, 07:14 PM
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/spence...nment-n2594235


Immediately following President Biden's attempt to blame everyone but his own administration for the chaotic collapse of Afghanistan, State Department spokesman Ned Price outlined just how far separated from reality the Biden administration has become.
Saying that the State Department is "still taking stock of what has transpired over the past 72 hours" and the "diplomatic and political implications of that," Price outlined the steps his department was taking to supposedly protect the people of Afghanistan.
"We are coordinating closely with Afghanistan's neighbors," he explained, seeking "an aligned approach to the evolving situation" with U.S. partners on the U.N. Security Council. "The fruits of that," Price said, was a statement from the Security Council that he called a "quite strong" and "quite clear" document.
"This statement says that the sustainable end of the conflict can only be achieved through an inclusive, just, durable, and realistic political settlement that upholds human rights — including for women, children, and minorities."
Apparently, the State Department and President Biden believe a statement from the U.N. will curb the Taliban's already-launched reinstatement of tyrannical rule over the Afghan people. And they also, apparently, hold out hope that the Taliban — which started the process of setting up an interim government in Kabul after President Ashraf Ghani fled — will respect the rights of women.
"Ultimately when it comes to our posture toward any future government in Afghanistan," explained Price. "It will depend upon the actions of that government, it will depend upon the actions of the Taliban."
"We will be watching very closely," Price promised. "We will be watching actions. That's what will be important to us."
"If the Taliban — or any government that is to emerge — seeks to have the level of international assistance that was needed to sustain the Afghan government over the past 20 years, the words on the paper that emanated from New York today, from the Security Council, will have to mean something," added Price. "Their actions will have to match some of the words that we have seen emanate from the Taliban."

Recommended
Did You Catch What's Wrong with Rashida Tlaib's Tweet about Afghanistan and the Taliban? Matt Vespa



One would think the Taliban's track record would speak for itself. In just its latest offensive that took back control of Afghanistan, there are reports that fighters slaughtered surrendering Afghan security forces and massacred unarmed civilians. And their past human rights abuses toward women and other minorities should suggest that "inclusive" or "just" governance is not on the new Taliban government's list of priorities.
Nevertheless, the Biden administration and its U.N. partners think they can scold the Taliban into better behavior.




How DUMB - can fiden/blinken and the liberal DPSTs Be - they show a profound lack of understanding of teh islamic radicals.

They believe they can 'reason' with the Taliban.



I have a bridge in brooklyn to sell the fiden administration - all I have to do is pretend to be a Taliban radical islamic terrorist - fiden/blinke,/winken/ and Nod will fall at my feet in orgasmic joy at teh purchase. .
HedonistForever's Avatar
"If the Taliban — or any government that is to emerge — seeks to have the level of international assistance

At which point the Taliban fell on the floor laughing, saying these crazy fucking Americans still think we want anything to do with them. We don't want your assistance, we don't need your assistance, stick your assistance they could be heard saying and Biden was shocked I tell you, shocked.
I agree wholeheartedly. They won. They give less than a shit about being inclusive or accepted they’ll soon give the US two fingers and kick up the beheadings and weddings. I think a Muslim man can have 4 wives and a mistress, if I recall correctly.
adav8s28's Avatar
I think a Muslim man can have 4 wives and a mistress, if I recall correctly. Originally Posted by 1blackman1
They have that in the state of Utah. No one complains about that.
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
They have that in the state of Utah. No one complains about that. Originally Posted by adav8s28
actually no its still illegal.
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
adav8s28's Avatar
actually no its still illegal. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
Yea, sort of like the hobbie, it's not enforced. Every so often there is a television special about these guys and how they handle their rotation.
How naive and stupid can these people be?

We are seeing it in real time.

Check out this CNN reporter who is being okayed for a useful idiot.

https://www.opindia.com/2021/08/cnn-...a-as-friendly/

“They are chanting death to America, but seem friendly”.

Unbelievable.
  • oeb11
  • 08-17-2021, 06:23 AM
They have that in the state of Utah. No one complains about that. Originally Posted by adav8s28

Polygamy is illegal in teh State of utah


'a' - You do like to spread Lies - like your LSM - don't You!!!
  • oeb11
  • 08-17-2021, 06:24 AM
How naive and stupid can these people be?

We are seeing it in real time.

Check out this CNN reporter who is being okayed for a useful idiot.

https://www.opindia.com/2021/08/cnn-...a-as-friendly/

“They are chanting death to America, but seem friendly”.

Unbelievable. Originally Posted by Jackie S

Xinn and MSNBC are now "The Voice of the Taliban"
ask CT - they are not Radical Islamic Terrorists - CT vouches for them!!!!!!!!!!!
rexdutchman's Avatar
Pudden will just send mo-money in a c-147