What city get the most sex and how do the other top 100 rank?

niceguy's Avatar
What city get the most sex and how do the other top 100 rank?

Oklahoma City ranks No. 8 on 'Hotbeds of Sex' list
Men's Health poll ranks 100 cities for sexual activity


Published: September 13, 2010

Oklahoma City's in the mood! That's right, according to the America's “Hotbeds of Sex” list published by Men's Health, Oklahoma City ranks eighth on a list of 100 of the most sexually active cities in the country.

I find it interesting Las Vegas ranks 70th. Tulsa is 38th, and of course much of Texas gets high rankings
Austin is 1 and Dallas is 2.



Oklahoma City ranks No. 8 on 'Hotbeds of Sex' list
More Info
1.) Austin, TX
2.) Dallas, TX
3.) Columbus, OH
4.) Durham, NC
5.) Denver, CO
6.) Indianapolis, IN
7.) Arlington, TX
8.) Oklahoma City, OK
9.) Bakersfield, CA
10.) Houston, TX
11.) Lubbock, TX
12.) Fort Worth, TX
13.) Charlotte, NC
14.) Fresno, CA
15.) San Antonio, TX
16.) Richmond, VA
17.) Anchorage, AK
18.) Nashville, TN
19.) Memphis, TN
20.) Kansas City, MO
21.) Atlanta, GA
22.) Omaha, NE
23.) Salt Lake City, UT
24.) Milwaukee, WI
25.) Jackson, MS
26.) Washington, DC
27.) El Paso, TX
28.) Baltimore, MD
29.) Raleigh, NC
30.) Wichita, KS
31.) Montgomery, AL
32.) Columbia, SC
33.) Philadelphia, PA
34.) Cincinnati, OH
35.) St. Paul, MN
36.) Sacramento, CA
37.) Grand Rapids, MI
38.) Tulsa, OK
39.) Modesto, CA
40.) Sioux Falls, SD
41.) Chicago, IL
42.) Fort Wayne, IN
43.) San Diego, CA
44.) Des Moines, IA
45.) Phoenix, AZ
46.) New Orleans, LA
47.) Lincoln, NE
48.) Little Rock, AR
49.) Birmingham, AL
50.) Minneapolis, MN
51.) Jacksonville, FL
52.) Colorado Springs, CO
53.) Corpus Christi, TX
54.) Los Angeles, CA
55.) Virginia Beach, VA
56.) Fargo, ND
57.) Albuquerque, NM
58.) St. Louis, MO
59.) Portland, OR
60.) Boise, ID
61.) Aurora, CO
62.) Toledo, OH
63.) Greensboro, NC
64.) Riverside, CA
65.) Detroit, MI
66.) Lexington, KY
67.) Providence, RI
68.) Madison, WI
69.) Newark, NJ
70.) Las Vegas, NV
71.) Orlando, FL
72.) Louisville, KY
73.) New York, NY
74.) San Francisco, CA
75.) Rochester, NY
76.) Boston, MA
77.) Cheyenne, WY
78.) Seattle, WA
79.) Spokane, WA
80.) Cleveland, OH
81.) San Jose, CA
82.) Honolulu, HI
83.) Tampa, FL
84.) Oakland, CA
85.) Anaheim, CA
86.) Tucson, AZ
87.) Jersey City, NJ
88.) Miami, FL
89.) Pittsburgh, PA
90.) Wilmington, DE
91.) Billings, MT
92.) Reno, NV
93.) Buffalo, NY
94.) Hartford, CT
95.) St. Petersburg, FL
96.) Manchester, NH
97.) Charleston, WV
98.) Yonkers, NY
99.) Burlington, VT
100.) Portland, ME
The list appears in the October issue of Men's Health as part of the magazine's monthly Metrogrades feature, which ranks 100 U.S. cities along varying criteria. The list is based on condom sales, birthrates, sex toy sales and rates of sexually transmitted diseases as determined by state health departments.
Austin ranked No. 1 followed by Dallas; Columbus, Ohio; Durham, N.C.; Denver; Indianapolis; and Arlington, Texas.
So, who's having the least sex? No. 100 on the list is Portland, Maine, just below Burlington, Vt.; Yonkers, N.Y.; Charleston, W.Va.; Manchester, N.H.; St. Petersburg, Fla.; Hartford, Conn.; Buffalo, N.Y.; Reno, Nev.; and Billings, Mont.


Read more: http://newsok.com/oklahoma-city-ranks-no.-8-on-hotbeds-of-sex-list/article/3494555#ixzz0zWTmXZwk




XXX
DallasRain's Avatar
New Orleans # 46...thats just wrong...I guess I am the only one having sex here..lol
cucharabill's Avatar
Mormon City Central is #23?????

Who would have, or could have, ever guessed?
Fast Gunn's Avatar
The survey must be talking about a different kind of sex than what I'm thinking about.

I would have thought that New York and Las Vegas would be ranked much higher.

Those two cities have many more providers than Austin.

Maybe the more revealing question should be to ask which city has the hottest women?
gman44's Avatar
New Orleans # 46...thats just wrong...I guess I am the only one having sex here..lol Originally Posted by DallasRain
you need to cum back to austin, sexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxy
Mormon City Central is #23?????

Who would have, or could have, ever guessed? Originally Posted by cucharabill
A religion that promotes multiple marriages and lots of children???? What do you think happens BCD??
DallasRain's Avatar
lol--genuisman..sounds like a plan......

that is a very surprising list!!
cucharabill's Avatar
A religion that promotes multiple marriages and lots of children???? What do you think happens BCD?? Originally Posted by charlestudor2005
Point well taken............
...yeah... but... Columbus at #3?

Columbus?
...yeah... but... Columbus at #3?

Columbus? Originally Posted by BBoy60
You forget about O State. Every jock and coed increases the rate for all the residents.
No wonder I enjoyed business travel so much...
offshoredrilling's Avatar
I am still trying to figure out if size of city was used in any way. NYC #73, Rochester NY #75. I live next to Rochester. If the size was a factor, it was good to make the list. If it was not, I very happy to be here. Buffalo at #93, and keeps crying.

Is there a link to tell just how the ranking was done?
jokacz's Avatar
The list is based on condom sales, birthrates, sex toy sales and rates of sexually transmitted diseases as determined by state health departments.

Read more: http://newsok.com/oklahoma-city-rank...#ixzz0zq1BcwxG
funny how dallas and fort worth are high ranks yet women are unwilling to.
offshoredrilling's Avatar
jokacz
I did read that. Has to be more to the story. Is that condom sales, or condom sales per 1000 in the city.
Population, 2006 estimate 8,214,426 NYC at #73
Population, 2006 estimate 208,123 Rochester at #75
Population, 2006 estimate 276,059 Buffalo at #93
Syracuse did not make the list.
Population, 2006 estimate 709,893 Austin at #1

So if Rochester NY buys almost as many condoms as NYC. Then every provider in Texas may want to take a look into moving to Rochester. And rather than NYC and Upstate NY. It would be Rochester NY and NY State(not in Rochester) for areas on the board.

Well we got it good in Rochester NY, but not that good. So the way it is stated in that link just has to be wrong.