http://www.eroticmp.com/
Many trafficed women do in fact work in parlors. Many are underage, beaten, raped, and have their families put at risk if they try to run. Would never have anything to do with them period. For all the legit ones, there are too many bad ones to even deal with it.
Originally Posted by London Rayne
I am offended and disappointed by unbalanced posts used as an attempt to support and elevate escorts, in general, as "the" choice among other providers in the hobby.
Furthermore, attempts to utilize a reputable AMP/EMP website like
http://eroticmp.com to support negative and biased views of AMPs/EMPs fall willfully short for any person willing to do some research on the site. In my opinion, that action constitutes fraudulent misrepresentation.
Being an active member of EroticMP for several years, I can tell you that for every post or comment relating to "forced servitude" of an AMP provider there are
hundreds providing documented cases of those who are AMP providers by choice and for a myriad of reasons with the most common reason being to pull/support their family out of poverty in Korea, China, and many South American countries etc.
I am a frequent client of a couple of AMPs with highly-reviewed providers. None of these establishments would
ever have anything to do with "forced servitude" of their providers.
In fact, I work very, very hard to seek out young Asian ladies who have been trained by an elderly Mama-san and trainer out of Flushing, New York. These ladies provide an overall experience unmatched by any other type of hobby provider. As one who has been in the hobby for 26 years, I have enough experience with
all types of providers to know this comment is true.
Aside from that, AMP providers are no different than any other type of provider (streetwalkers, escorts, strippers, etc.) in the hobby; there is (and will always be) a certain percentage of these ladies (including escorts) who are being unwillingly forced to be a sex worker.
My final comment is this. I'm getting f*****g tired of defending a particular segment of the hobby to other segments. It's pure BS and self-serving.
There is a place and a need for all types of providers in the marketplace. Regardless of what any provider thinks, she is no better than any other type of provider in the hobby as long as she does her best to provide her clients with an excellent experience based on his needs, desires, and amount of expendable and available income he has to pay for the service. Each type of provider serves a different segment of the market. Each have their own place and niche in the marketplace.
Attempts at badmouthing one segment of the hobby over another in order to "elevate" another is damaging to the hobby as a whole.
In my opinion, I have an obligation and responsibility to defend and support all segments of the hobby. It's not relevant that I choose not utilize the service in certain segments. That has no bearing, whatsoever, on my obligation and responsibility to be a positive representative of the hobby, as a whole and in its entirety.