The strongest argument for military action in Syria is to save the reputation of Obama. This morning I sit down and see Obama in Sweden trying to get support for his military campaign. He couldn't even stay on topic but strayed over to global warming and green energy. He just got a question from an attractive young lady about electronic surrveillance in the US. He denies that any surrveillance is going on and then says that "if" any thing like that is going on then maybe the laws are not strong enough (or weak enough) to allow the government to do what has to be done to fight against terrorism (I guess it depends on what you mean by the word terrorism). I love this part....she looks bored now because he is still answering the question after five minutes. His answer is that we are not, but if we are, there is a good reason, the law has not kept up with technology, we will review what we're doing, we are doing what is necessary, and don't look at the man behind the curtain.
Seven minutes and still talking....back to green energy and global warming. I think the young lady is going to hang herself. Eight minutes and Obama says he gets called names back in the US (wah!). He stopped! Just short of nine minutes.
Oops! Too soon. The question is about is Obama getting support from Sweden for Syria. Obama huffs and says he didn't set a "red line", it was the world who set a "red line". It was the world and not him. He sounds a little angry with the question. I love this, his credibility is not on the line (according to Barry) but the credibility of the world and Congress is on the line. Delusional? You be the judge.