Anything that scares the shit out of a Liberal is a Conspiracy Theory, lol. Originally Posted by Levianon17Alex, we've got a live one.
Alex, we've got a live one.You asked;
Let's see. Where is that evidence of MASSIVE election fraud. It was here just a minute ago....but now...can't locate it.
Maybe someone took it and is hiding it. A conspiracy within a conspiracy ? Originally Posted by VitaMan
Alex, we've got a live one.Yeah, yeah, Liberals thought there was Russian Collusion in 2016. Adam Schiff said he had evidence and never produced a smidgen. Now voter fraud in 2020 and Jan 6th. That's all conspiracy because no one has produced any evidence. Liberals only want one side of an issue, theirs. Anything else is a Conspiracy. If you want evidence of that go back and read all of your prior posts.
Let's see. Where is that evidence of MASSIVE election fraud. It was here just a minute ago....but now...can't locate it.
Maybe someone took it and is hiding it. A conspiracy within a conspiracy ? Originally Posted by VitaMan
Back on topic.Oh you can't say that. The Liberals can't handle the Dominion Voter Machine Conspiracy. The only Evidence the Liberals will accept is if the machines can talk, lol.
The Dominion machines were rigged.
No fair doing more than one at a time. Let everyone in on the fun. Originally Posted by Charley3
Yeah, yeah, Liberals thought there was Russian Collusion in 2016. Adam Schiff said he had evidence and never produced a smidgen. Now voter fraud in 2020 and Jan 6th. That's all conspiracy because no one has produced any evidence. Liberals only want one side of an issue, theirs. Anything else is a Conspiracy. If you want evidence of that go back and read all of your prior posts. Originally Posted by Levianon17They, at least the political class, never believed any of that. They just repeated it enough that soft-brains began to take it as fact. Like many other propaganda campaigns throughout history, it was quite effective.
Why only election fraud conspiracy when Trump loses ?whistleblowers are considered evidence and there were alot of them who saw something fishy. the judges ignored them in-spite of precedent of using them to open discovery in other election fraud cases (those races were minor and local/state and of no consequence in the larger scheme of things)
And despite the ignorance of some, no evidence of MASSIVE election fraud was ever produced.
Check the court records. Originally Posted by VitaMan