https://www.yahoo.com/news/calmes-do...014733375.html
The gop parties and their supporters are so fucked up. Just another fact
- Tsmokies
- 03-22-2023, 04:54 PM
- The_Waco_Kid
- 03-22-2023, 05:00 PM
https://www.yahoo.com/news/calmes-do...014733375.html
The gop parties and their supporters are so fucked up. Just another fact Originally Posted by Tsmokies
if Jackie Calmes says so.
bahahahahahaa
- Tsmokies
- 03-22-2023, 07:07 PM
https://www.yahoo.com/news/rep-jim-j...061735469.html
Committee man speaks and gets owned again. America don't need no damn budget. Gop is clueless and have really important
Shit to do like fuck the rule of law
Committee man speaks and gets owned again. America don't need no damn budget. Gop is clueless and have really important
Shit to do like fuck the rule of law
- The_Waco_Kid
- 03-22-2023, 07:10 PM
https://www.yahoo.com/news/rep-jim-j...061735469.html
Committee man speaks and gets owned again. America don't need no damn budget. Gop is clueless and have really important
Shit to do like fuck the rule of law
since several posters like to "consider the source" .. let's consider the source.
HuffPost
- farmstud60
- 03-22-2023, 07:27 PM
Biggest bunch of horse pucky ever. Democrats have weaponized the judicial system against those that don't fall in line with their Marxist garbage.
- Tigbitties38
- 03-23-2023, 05:34 AM
The huffpost link deals with jordan's tweet about not thinking trump did anything wrong.
The OP link comes from the Los Angeles Times. That source describes the maga response to the trump comments about being arrested.
Comments about arrest that trump himself made. No one but trump talked about trump being picked up.
Even when using a suspect source, a story can be checked by checking other story/sources.
The provided link in the OP describes actions taken the gop. All which can be checked and confirmed. Each story should be judged on its own merits and available evidence.
The OP link comes from the Los Angeles Times. That source describes the maga response to the trump comments about being arrested.
Comments about arrest that trump himself made. No one but trump talked about trump being picked up.
Even when using a suspect source, a story can be checked by checking other story/sources.
The provided link in the OP describes actions taken the gop. All which can be checked and confirmed. Each story should be judged on its own merits and available evidence.
since several posters like to "consider the source" .. let's consider the source.
HuffPost
- the_real_Barleycorn
- 03-23-2023, 02:49 PM
Yes, the source...Ms Calmes has several articles about the radicalization of the GOP and a book about the radicalization of the Supreme Court under the GOP. She likes that word "radicalization" but probably doesn't understand it's meaning.
- Tigbitties38
- 03-24-2023, 01:44 AM
Wrong. You like the word "radicalized".
On the other hand, her use of the word is correct (in the single use I found by her).
In case you missed the midterms, your favorite word cost repubs the senate. I would say the reversal of roe vs.wade was the move of a radicalized court. Just because you can't understand the talking points you are instructed to repeat, doesn't mean most of us don't.
She is an investigational reporter, winner of several news awards (something the fox opinion crew is lacking). Plus I would like add that your take/opinion on her opinions doesn't mean anything in the larger scope of things. Maybe one day you'll understand why your "logic" isn't logic.
Using your criteria, this woman makes carlson look like a tool, while lacking any credentials in the world we live in.
Your notion she is biased just because she has written about an obvious issue, and telling the truth about it, would cause any carlson fan to soil his jammies. His nightly rants about subjects he knows are lies shows true lack of credibility.
So now we've settled the issue of which sources are credible and which sources (people and network sources)knowingly lie to their viewers, we can rule you out as a source of reliable info.
Exposing the lies and misinformation of your people is important.
Tell you what, you provide proof she has lied in a column,
I'll start in on the fox POSs.
You've personally been caught lying on too many occasions to recount them here.
You can go now.
On the other hand, her use of the word is correct (in the single use I found by her).
In case you missed the midterms, your favorite word cost repubs the senate. I would say the reversal of roe vs.wade was the move of a radicalized court. Just because you can't understand the talking points you are instructed to repeat, doesn't mean most of us don't.
She is an investigational reporter, winner of several news awards (something the fox opinion crew is lacking). Plus I would like add that your take/opinion on her opinions doesn't mean anything in the larger scope of things. Maybe one day you'll understand why your "logic" isn't logic.
Using your criteria, this woman makes carlson look like a tool, while lacking any credentials in the world we live in.
Your notion she is biased just because she has written about an obvious issue, and telling the truth about it, would cause any carlson fan to soil his jammies. His nightly rants about subjects he knows are lies shows true lack of credibility.
So now we've settled the issue of which sources are credible and which sources (people and network sources)knowingly lie to their viewers, we can rule you out as a source of reliable info.
Exposing the lies and misinformation of your people is important.
Tell you what, you provide proof she has lied in a column,
I'll start in on the fox POSs.
You've personally been caught lying on too many occasions to recount them here.
You can go now.
Yes, the source...Ms Calmes has several articles about the radicalization of the GOP and a book about the radicalization of the Supreme Court under the GOP. She likes that word "radicalization" but probably doesn't understand it's meaning. Originally Posted by the_real_BarleycornOf course she knows what the word means. If she didn't, she would look it up. Something you should have done but didn't.