ACLU really has changed

Title IX: The Civil Rights the ACLU Won't Defend


https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar..._medium=social


It looks like ACLU doesn't believe in due process. for thee but not for thou!


one has to wonder if the aclu in general believe this.

Title IX: The Civil Rights the ACLU Won't Defend


https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar..._medium=social


It looks like ACLU doesn't believe in due process. for thee but not for thou!


one has to wonder if the aclu in general believe this. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

That is fucked up. I really like the ACLU (Google Ollie North and ACLU) but it appears they have fallen victim to this MeToo crap.

It does seem like the old ACLU would have defended the accused more.

That is fucked up. I really like the ACLU (Google Ollie North and ACLU) but it appears they have fallen victim to this MeToo crap. Originally Posted by WTF

in the eternal pantheon of posts, both living and dead, one of your more sensible

Title IX: The Civil Rights the ACLU Won't Defend


https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar..._medium=social


It looks like ACLU doesn't believe in due process. for thee but not for thou!


one has to wonder if the aclu in general believe this. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

The ACLU, like NOW, The Southern Poverty Law Center, NAACP, NBC and many others are just paid arms of the Democratic Socialist party. Some like ThinkProgress and FrontiersWithOutBorders are just more extreme than others.

I used to be a card carrying member of the ACLU but no more. Apologies to WTF in advance (it's good to see him come together on this), but they've become a partisan organization, where they weren't before.

I used to be a card carrying member of the ACLU but no more. Apologies to WTF in advance (it's good to see him come together on this), but they've become a partisan organization, where they weren't before. Originally Posted by Tiny

they've gotten involved in DA elections, something they never did before until last year.

they've gotten involved in DA elections, something they never did before until last year. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

that's a hallmark and telltale sign and signature of a george soros influence

I used to be a card carrying member of the ACLU but no more. Apologies to WTF in advance (it's good to see him come together on this), but they've become a partisan organization, where they weren't before. Originally Posted by Tiny

Every organization is partisan as is every individual.

It seems the ACLU has shifted their partisanship away from both yours and mine in this regard.

that's a hallmark and telltale sign and signature of a george soros influence Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

Are you saying that is a bad thing?

Do you think right leaning organization should be involved in elections such as this?

ACLU doesn't believe in due process. for thee but not for thou! The ACLU has in my opinion always been very liberal. So sadly its again who you are and what media attention they can get ,Yup fucked up

ACLU doesn't believe in due process. for thee but not for thou! The ACLU has in my opinion always been very liberal. So sadly its again who you are and what media attention they can get ,Yup fucked up Originally Posted by rexdutchman

Liberal as in fighting for freedom for all (although not in this case)
...you think fighting for your personal freedoms is a liberal cause? If so, we should all be more liberal.

Are you saying that is a bad thing?

Do you think right leaning organization should be involved in elections such as this? Originally Posted by WTF

im saying that its a sign that george soros has corrupted the aclu, which up above somewhere you seemed to agree as to its corruption, so you, to a logically thinking person, are also seemingly agreeing the corruption is a bad thing

im saying that its a sign that george soros has corrupted the aclu, which up above somewhere you seemed to agree as to its corruption, so you, to a logically thinking person, are also seemingly agreeing the corruption is a bad thing Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

You are convoluting two things as one.

I do not agree with the aclu's position in the OP.

I do not agree with your supposition that George Soros has corrupted the ACLU furthermore I do not know if them supporting one DA over another is corruption.

You would not do well in a court of law as you basis for facts is more than a little shakey

You are convoluting two things as one.

I do not agree with the aclu's position in the OP.

I do not agree with your supposition that George Soros has corrupted the ACLU furthermore I do not know if them supporting one DA over another is corruption.

You would not do well in a court of law as you basis for facts is more than a little shakey Originally Posted by WTF

no you aren't clear in many posts then

read the below slowly and as many times as you need:

I said that the aclu now being involved in da elections is a sign of soros being involved in the aclu, as since now the aclu is involved in the elections of da's, one could then see soros as a likely source of the aclu's corruption because trying to affect da elections is a project of soros and the topic was the corruption of the aclu


had nothing to do with whether or not soros can try to affect da elections, or that doing so is in and of itself corruption, thats your feverish take

I wont go back through this whole thing step by step for you as its likely pointless