cut or uncut?

im uncut guy with an avg size penis. the foreskin is fairly long completely covers the tip even when hard but is retractable. tip is very sensitive to the touch when uncovered. ive had some girls that really like it and some had that look and would just hold the skin back like if were cut. im always clean down stairs and trimmed.

which do u ladies prefer circumcised or uncircumcised and why? any ladies prefer one over the other because of sexual pleasure?

Not long ago there was a similar thread here: http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=111089

Read some of the responses there.

I always pull the skin back too....at first it was because that's what I saw them do in porn, then it was more to abtain a good suction on it. Now, I do have one fine gentleman that I see, his skin is not thick or too long, so I don't bother pulling it back at all. I just enjoy it.

Do I have a preference between one and the other? Nope!

All penis's are beautiful!(As long as they're clean).
I know some ladies don't like uncut, but it's fine with me.

My .02 $ worth. I am uncircumcised. As I grew older the foreskin retreated to behind the glans. It is there in a roll and is not painful. I pay particular attention to daily cleaning.

Providers have commented but none have voiced any objections.

As long as its hard it doesnt matter to me

CUT!

I recently had my first uncut client..I couldn't take my hands off it! It was so purdy lol. He was super clean,too. I don't have a preference,though. Back in the day I was with a guy that was uncut. It was fun giving him a HJ. He lasted a long time during sex,too.

As long as its hard it doesnt matter to me Originally Posted by Sweet N Little

Great answer!

I took the time to read the link charlestudor2005 provided, and you might also find it good reading. After reading the link, and being uncircumcised/uncut, I have several thoughts to share.

1. Many were concerned with hygiene. It is true that fluids are trapped in the foreskin, and unless those lubricant fluids were just manufactured, say from female stimulation, they can remit a small odor after some time. So....uncut men...knowing this....most always opt for a shower prior to sex.
2. While the "manufacture" of liquids can cause problems such as odor, that manufacturing process provides the uncut man ready made lubricant after an arousal....and I am thinking of an arousal that doesn't end in sex. The feeling throughout the day of the pig in the blanket slightly lubricated is wonderful! That being said, as I am aroused a lot more often than I have sex, uncut and lubricated can provide wonderful stimulation throughout the day.
3. When going out on a date, freshly showered, arousal may occur, and the lubrication begins....and the lubricant is "trapped" between the foreskin and penis. When a short time passes between the start of the date, (a time short enough that a penis odor does not manifest), and a liason occurs that results in sex, two scenarios manifest.
a. The lady may begin oral sex, and if she does, she often encounters that clear and odorless lubricant. I am told by most women, and yes I have sampled my own and agree, that the lubricant is odorless and tasteless, and a real turn on.
b. If sexual activity immediately moves to intercourse, and a condom is not required due to the nature of the relationship, the uncut male has self-made lubricant that assists in creating an easy penetration.
4. As for the comments about BJs, and how sensitive an uncut man is, that normally is true. While cut men most always have their penis heads rubbing against underwear during non-sexual life activities, the underwear absorbs any self-manufactured lubricant, and the constant touching, scraping, rubbing, etc. ultimately desensitizes the head. A BJ to me is so intense that most times it reaches the level of ecstasy that it is almost painful to continue. Of course, the BJ producer has a lot to do with those feelings as well.
5. Handjobs were mentioned. Again, if the lubrication process has begun, the uncut penis immediately can respond to the handjob process without undue friction creating an uncomfortable handjob. It is not uncommon if I am well lubricated not to require another lubricant application.

Final Thoughts

1. All in all....I haven't found women turned off by my uncut status...but most were intriqued and fascinated....especially wanting to observe the head being covered and uncovered during the handjob process. I note here some women have a preference for cut men, and I accept their preference, just as I expect women to accept some of my preferences.
2. During a BJ, some pull the foreskin back while going down, and pull the foreskin forward with their lips or hand when withdrawing. For me....this is absolute ecstasy...regardless of whether a CIM finish is planned....or intercourse is planned. Other women, during a BJ, simply pull the foreskin back and keep it pulled back. Guess what, that feels great, too! So....for those of us who are uncut....we have the possibility of the foreskin being utilized to create additional pleasure....or having the foreskin simply being pulled back out of the way. Sounds like a great choice to me as an uncut male.
3. The protection provided by the foreskin, i.e. my penis is not constantly rubbing against underwear during life events that do not include sex, simply provides a great sexual feeling throughout the day. Yes...to those who have mentioned it....at the end of the day....especially if I have been sweating....a small odor, and sometimes a great odor, may manifest. Certainly a shower is mandated before initiating sex, or responding to initiated sex by another.
4. The protection of the foreskin makes most uncut men's penus head more sensitive. One negative with this additional sensitivity is that uncut men often have a "shorter fuse." And, when a woman is really into the intercourse sex act, that short fuse is normally not appreciated. I give cut men the advantage here.
5. I have never met a man who wanted to relinquish his foreskin...because he enjoys the benefits I outlined....with the only real detriment being an occasional, unwanted odor. I don't find the fact that some women don't want an uncut male as a real detriment....for there are some who prefer an uncut male....and most who simply don't care....provided there are no hygiene issues.
6. Circumcision of an adult male, if he is like me, would be a horribly painful and bloody mess. I have a very large vein, and several smaller veins, that protrude into the foreskin, providing additional pleasure to me. So....even without the benefits of additional pleasure....the pain, recovery time, and resulting tissue scarring is something most all uncut men will "take a pass on."
7. I don't know about other men, but I accept my uncut status as an additional benefit in life. I have greater sensitivity, I enjoy the pigs in a blanket days, I enjoy the two methods of BJs only available to uncut men, I enjoy the lubricant during handjobs, I enjoy the lubricant during the initial penetration, and I enjoy a woman's surprise when she learns I am uncut....for as I said....most find it intriguing and exciting.
8. It probably doesn't need to be said after all I wrote, but I wouldn't trade my uncut status. I don't believe those who are cut are particularly suffering in life either, or would want to change status with me. But....in the end....they no longer have a choice. Wherever we find ourselves as men in this status as cut or uncut, those who are cut will simply live with it, and most of us who are uncut....are also living with our status with no plans to change that status.

This is lengthy, and I don't know if many will read it. But, especially for ladies, perhaps this personal report will provide some insight into the physical realities of uncut men, and most likely their mental satisfaction with their uncut status. I will humbly offer myself up to any woman who wants to do her own research! LOL!!!!

Finally, there are questions about the different STD transfer rates of cut men vs. uncut men. One can find enough articles about this situation without me referencing them in this report. Simply put, however, all sexual activity has an inherent risk of a STD transfer. Protected sex is mandatory to reduce risks of STDs.

I don't judge one way or the other, but I've never had a long term personal relationship with a guy who wasn't partially because they are so pretty when they are cut. And to be honest, I worry about harming that foreskin, accidentally getting caught in my teeth etc. Definitely a higher comfort level with uncut mostly because that is what I'm used to.

circumcised, foreskin looks kind of weird to me IMO,I've noticed a lot of men are circumcised and not just guys who are Jewish.

I think it's more of a personal preference vs. health issues, stds, etc. This is just another AA thread with a different theme. I don't see men who are not cut, and I have already done enough research to know that 80 percent do NOT know how to properly clean that area. Based only on MY experiences this is a choice I have made.

Others may not have had the same, but then again considering the number of refs I have gotten saying guys are great, clean, and not big at all, I would venture to say not everyone has the same standards on different issues.

circumcised, foreskin looks kind of weird to me IMO,I've noticed a lot of men are circumcised and not just guys who are Jewish. Originally Posted by BellaIsabella

This is a Judeo-Christian tradition. It is a religious rite that had its genesis (pun intended) in the Jewish religion, but the rite carried over to Christianity. So, circumcision is prevalent among men who were born in nations where Christianity is the predominant religion. For Christians, it is done primarily in the hospitals within hours/days of birth.

In the Jewish religion it is done primarily in the home by a Rabbi.

I think it's more of a personal preference vs. health issues, stds, etc. This is just another AA thread with a different theme. I don't see men who are not cut, and I have already done enough research to know that 80 percent do NOT know how to properly clean that area. Based only on MY experiences this is a choice I have made.

Others may not have had the same, but then again considering the number of refs I have gotten saying guys are great, clean, and not big at all, I would venture to say not everyone has the same standards on different issues. Originally Posted by London Rayne

For you, this may be true. But after reading the other thread, it appeared to me that a majority of the ladies were complaining about lack of cleanliness. I think it would be quite a turn off if you go to give a BBBJ and encounter a wad of penis jam just under the folds of the skin.

Word!