Jim Crow 2.0 the democraps new battle cry!!

The democraps are the 'party' of misinformation and lies...this it their new battle cry...because 'voting rights' have never been more important than NOW. They have said over and over that the 2020 election was the most secure election in US history. Can anyone of the leftwingers on here explain why their party is STUCK ON STUPID?? Don't hijack the thread with your nonsense 'just the facts' that pertain to the topic of the thread I know deflection it a habit a lot of you can't kick!! Who one here feels that if this garbage doesn't pass their ability to vote might be endangered??


Today’s ruling “party” is fond of language invention. Most bills they’ve proposed have nothing to do with what they seek. Build Back Better… isn’t. Their latest bills, the “Freedom to Vote Act” and the “John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act,” have nothing to do with the freedom to vote or advancing any right to vote.

No one who can vote is prevented from voting. No One. The Party invokes John Lewis to manipulate thought and advance an agenda, not citizens’ rights. Both bills are about one thing — retaining power. The Party is horrified that people aren’t buying into their “doublespeak” and fear that unless they can federalize voting, they will be out of power in January 2023.

The way the Party has chosen to retain power is to manipulate facts and manipulate language. In short — to lie.

Biden is again yelling at critics and taking softball questions from his willing sycophants in the media, and when he’s not doing that, he’s blathering nonsense. Calling everyone who disagrees with The Party “confederates,” racists, and Bull Connor hasn’t worked, so it’s now settled on slandering a thing, rather than people. All voting laws such as requiring an ID to vote are a redo of Jim Crow racism. Biden even called voting laws worse than Jim Crow.

Thus, the Party’s new, adopted slur is “Jim Crow 2.0”. Biden sees it as a winning strategy.

It’s unadulterated nonsense. Biden, Pelosi, and Schumer have moved The Party to use it repeatedly, hoping that voters will fall for that perversion of language. It’s another attempt at Newspeak 2.0.

“Jim Crow 2.0” has no relation to reality. It’s a flock of slander hatched out of the empty head of Joe Biden.


From: Jim Thompson

Your source is Jim Thompson fabrics ?


Post has plenty of BS in it. That's the thread topic.....production of BS.

Your source is Jim Thompson fabrics ?


Post has plenty of BS in it. That's the thread topic.....production of BS. Originally Posted by VitaMan

no u goob. not unless Jim Thompson speaks from the grave. he was declared dead and going missing in 1967. considering he'd be about 115 years old today unlikely he's alive today.


he was a rather interesting person ...


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Th..._II_activities


his company still exists today


https://www.jimthompsonfabrics.com/about-us


btw sparky when was the last time you cited a source in your many one star nothing threads?

The source must be Big Jim Thompson, former governor of Illinois


The OP is having so much trouble these days remembering things and making accurate posts with his severe BDS, maybe this will help calm him down:




Brandon is the second-largest city in the province of Manitoba, Canada.
Only the first letter needs to be capitalized.

The source must be Big Jim Thompson, former governor of Illinois


The OP is having so much trouble these days remembering things and making accurate posts with his severe BDS, maybe this will help calm him down:




Brandon is the second-largest city in the province of Manitoba, Canada.
Only the first letter needs to be capitalized. Originally Posted by VitaMan

then why did you snark post about Jim Thompson fabrics? beyond the fact that googie tarding Jim Thompson brings his info up?


and yet again "Big Jim Thompson" .. no relation to the other Jim Thompson .. is just as dead?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_R._Thompson



BAAHHHAAAAAAAAA

Did you say something ?

Did you say something ? Originally Posted by VitaMan

i could say nothing and say more that u


BAAHHAHHAAAA

Your source is Jim Thompson fabrics ?


Post has plenty of BS in it. That's the thread topic.....production of BS. Originally Posted by VitaMan

Again you go apoplectic with reality...what is you source to call bullshit other then your blabbering nonsense...the greatness of the stimulus check...giving away other people money. You and ada cheer the 'free' money.
PROVE THAT ANYONE'S VOTE IS BEING SUPPRESSED UNLESS THE DECOCRAPS TAKE OVER OF THE ELECTIONS...YOU FUCKING CAN'T
You shot your know nothing mouth off with nothing to back up your steady stream of nonsense.

Another totally off the wall post by the BDS sufferer


And you bitch about Kaitlyn too !

Is she your mama??
And your PROOF...NANA!!
AS ALWAYS.. now get back to your obsession...TRUMP
As TWK says...you ALWAYS say...NOTHING.

You can't be out chasing women with your BDS.
Or can you ?


Or maybe she is out of your price range.

Kaitlyn and bb


BB and Kaitlyn


LET'S GO KAITLYN

For your reading pleasure...


'Who Is Ray Epps?' Cruz Grills FBI agent on Involvement in Jan. 6; Their Answers Raise More Questions

Jill Sanborn, executive assistant director of the FBI’s National Security Branch was testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee. That’s when Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) asked some very good questions to which she didn’t have a response. Cruz asked about FBI involvement/informants in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

“How many FBI agents or confidential informants actively participated in the events of January 6th?” Cruz asked. Sanborn said that she couldn’t go into “sources and methods.” Cruz continued asking if any FBI agents or confidential informants participated, to which Sanborn said, “I can’t answer that.” He then asked if any of them committed crimes of violence or incited crimes? Again, she refused to answer.


Then Cruz went all-in, asking, “Who is Ray Epps?” Ray Epps is a man who has been speculated on a lot because he was very active, encouraging people to go into the Capitol, yet doesn’t appear to have been pursued by the FBI when the FBI seems to be pursuing people who so much as breathed near the Capitol that day.

Sanborn’s response? “I’m aware of the individual.” But she doesn’t disabuse anyone of the belief that he could be FBI-connected; indeed, her failure to fully respond, got even more tongues talking.

“Ms. Sanborn, was Ray Epps a fed,” Cruz asked.

“I cannot answer that,” Sanborn responded. I guess that answers that question right there, which leads to a lot of other questions.

Cruz noted how five seconds after Epps talks to someone, that person starts to tear down a barricade. Did Epps urge him to tear down the barricade, Cruz asked Sanborn. And again, she said that she couldn’t answer that.

Cruz said many Americans are concerned that the federal government encouraged illegal activity, noting that — oddly — Epps had been removed from the list that the FBI had put out of people they were looking for in connection to Jan. 6. Sanborn then finally says that “not to her knowledge” did the FBI “actively” encourage violent criminal conduct.


But she didn’t respond as to the other questions, and her failure to respond was in itself an answer, leaving all kinds of questions about the FBI being involved. She didn’t deny that Epps was an FBI or an informant.

Complete nothing here. It is a zero. Absence of anything.

So that is what you say to yourself when you look in the mirror...the only time you've been honest!!