Dna studies have shown that 25k to 30k years ago migrations started from Siberia. Thru the centuries there was at least 3 waves from Siberia.Thank you for that clarification. I have not done any reading on the subject for a number of years. DNA research has revolutionized many aspects of anthropology. Iwas fascinated reading "Collapse" By Jarad Diamond. I was surprised to read that the original settlers in Greenland were not the Inuit, but the Vikings.
All of which have some version of asiatic blood. Originally Posted by winn dixie
Yeah the American Indians. This day is in remembrance of how European Settlers beat the shit out of them,stole their land and put them on reservations. I am sure that's the part members of the remaining tribes won't forget. Originally Posted by Levianon17dude, don't call them indians.
Thank you for that clarification. I have not done any reading on the subject for a number of years. DNA research has revolutionized many aspects of anthropology. Iwas fascinated reading "Collapse" By Jarad Diamond. I was surprised to read that the original settlers in Greenland were not the Inuit, but the Vikings.how thr russians treat them?
A number of years ago, I read a book titled "1491" by Charles C. Mann which talks about the Americas before Columbus.
Another story is how the Japanese and Russians treated the Ainu, a hunter-gathering people who ocupied the the Northern Japanese archipelago and the Sakhalin peninsula before the coming of the other "advanced" cultures. I looked hat up on Wikpedia. Originally Posted by ICU 812
Thank you for that clarification. I have not done any reading on the subject for a number of years. DNA research has revolutionized many aspects of anthropology. Iwas fascinated reading "Collapse" By Jarad Diamond. I was surprised to read that the original settlers in Greenland were not the Inuit, but the Vikings.Anthropology is very interesting.
A number of years ago, I read a book titled "1491" by Charles C. Mann which talks about the Americas before Columbus.
Another story is how the Japanese and Russians treated the Ainu, a hunter-gathering people who ocupied the the Northern Japanese archipelago and the Sakhalin peninsula before the coming of the other "advanced" cultures. I looked hat up on Wikpedia. Originally Posted by ICU 812
dude, don't call them indians.Dilbert is technically right. And the term goes hand to hand with the growing sentiments about the truths of Columbus.
they're not indians as that was 600 year mistake that was never corrected.
siberians maybe. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
naming names for indigenous North Americans is problematic. there are many different tribes in different regions. they're all related to one degree or another.
central america has an official name for the native there. its Meso American and that is primarily due to the empires that used to exist prior to the Spanish invasion.
South america supposedly has one, but have not found the name for them. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
dude, don't call them indians.There were different tribes with different languages and customs. I am sure they came from different places. Collectively they were called Indians.
they're not indians as that was 600 year mistake that was never corrected.
siberians maybe. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm