Obama was effectively funding Ayers’ radical education projects, as well as the work of Ayers’ wife, Bernardine Dohrn, and the work of Ayers’ closest political allies. Substantial evidence also indicates that it was Ayers who brought Obama onto the board of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. More shocking, it was almost certainly Obama himself who brought Ayers onto the Woods Fund Board.http://www.amazon.com/dp/B004Q7E0V8/?tag=powlin0b-20
The plan was to attack the prestigious citywide system of magnet schools that had been set up for students with high test scores. They would be replaced by Afrocentric “small schools” under the influence, if not the control, of ACORN.
To try to implement this vision, Ayers used the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC). Obama was the chairman of CAC’s board — placed in that position by Ayers according to David Remnick, Obama’s friendly biographer. . . .
CAC was, predictably, a failure by any usual measure. Obama and Ayers spent $100 million with no discernible improvement in the test scores of low-performing schools (sound familiar???)
The “small schools” didn’t help improve test scores, but one of them was a “peace school” where students celebrated United Nations-themed events instead of traditional American holidays. Another school was Aztec-themed and focused on Mexican culture.
Ayers’ goal was to make schools “sites of resistance” to an oppressive system. Obama supplied the money to try and make this happen. And the money tended to flow to leftist outfits like ACORN and Obama’s own Developing Communities Project.
- Whirlaway
- 07-03-2014, 12:58 PM
In the early days as a Chicago community organizer Obama was a failure then as now..........while working as a consultant for the corrupt ACORN, Obama conspired with Bill Ayers and his wife Bernadine Dohrn to radically alter the education of Chicago public school students.....
- Guest051115
- 07-03-2014, 01:42 PM
Newsflash:
- lustylad
- 07-03-2014, 01:52 PM
.
NEWS UPDATE:
...a plurality of American voters now wish Romney had won the presidency, according to a new poll from Quinnipiac. Forty-five percent of voters said America would have been better off with a Romney win in the 2012 election, while 38 percent said the US would be worse off... "Would Mitt have been a better fit?" Quinnipiac Assistant Director Tim Malloy said. "More voters in hindsight say ‘yes.’ "
.
NEWS UPDATE:
...a plurality of American voters now wish Romney had won the presidency, according to a new poll from Quinnipiac. Forty-five percent of voters said America would have been better off with a Romney win in the 2012 election, while 38 percent said the US would be worse off... "Would Mitt have been a better fit?" Quinnipiac Assistant Director Tim Malloy said. "More voters in hindsight say ‘yes.’ "
.
- Yssup Rider
- 07-03-2014, 03:45 PM
.What percentage of voters voted for Romney? 49%? Looks like he's slipped in this all-telling poll, IBJunior.
NEWS UPDATE:
...a plurality of American voters now wish Romney had won the presidency, according to a new poll from Quinnipiac. Forty-five percent of voters said America would have been better off with a Romney win in the 2012 election, while 38 percent said the US would be worse off... "Would Mitt have been a better fit?" Quinnipiac Assistant Director Tim Malloy said. "More voters in hindsight say ‘yes.’ "
. Originally Posted by lustylad
Last time I looked a MAJORITY of Americans wanted Bush out of there.
of course, your entire post is irrelevant, IBJunior.
IVE SAID THIS TIME AND TIME AGAIN... YOU FINE AMERICANS OBVIOUSLY HAVE THE NUMBERS AND THE ENTHUSIASM TO COMPLETELY OVERTHROW THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT, peacefully, violently, politically. According to you AMERICANS SUPPORT YOUR DESIRE TO OVERTHROW THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENTS.
WHY HAVENT YOU?
Right... Please, keep ECCIE STUPID!
- Yssup Rider
- 07-03-2014, 03:48 PM
- IIFFOFRDB
- 07-03-2014, 05:24 PM
The Neoliberals want to program the students. NOT educate them, they want to rewrite history.
- Solemate62
- 07-03-2014, 05:33 PM
How fucking riotous - all of the right wing racists who pissed and moan within this forum on a daily basis, they can not admit to these two simple historical facts:
>A black man trounced their white senile candidate in the 2008 presidential election!
>that same black man trounced their second Great White Hope candidate in the 2012 presidential election!
Game-Set-Match!
>A black man trounced their white senile candidate in the 2008 presidential election!
>that same black man trounced their second Great White Hope candidate in the 2012 presidential election!
Game-Set-Match!
- lustylad
- 07-03-2014, 06:16 PM
What percentage of voters voted for Romney? 49%? Looks like he's slipped in this all-telling poll, IBJunior.Your comments are relevant only for demonstrating what a complete moron you are, assup ride-me. Try viewing the results this way:
of course, your entire post is irrelevant, IBJunior.
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
What percentage of voters voted for Odumbo in 2012? 51%? Looks like he's slipped by a whopping 13 percentage points since then, doesn't it?
Is that a valid way to interpret the poll, dipshit, or are you just a complete fraud?
.
- Jackie S
- 07-03-2014, 06:19 PM
How fucking riotous - all of the right wing racists who pissed and moan within this forum on a daily basis, they can not admit to these two simple historical facts:And that same a Black Man, (actually only 1/2 black), is probably going to go down as the worst President in US History.
>A black man trounced their white senile candidate in the 2008 presidential election!
>that same black man trounced their second Great White Hope candidate in the 2012 presidential election!
Game-Set-Match! Originally Posted by Solemate62
It is really a shame. With so many fine qualified Black Men in this great a country, the effort was wasted on this petty Demagogue.
Perhaps the American Electorate will learn from this fiasco. But as long as they are willing to buy the empty promises of The Demagogue, I doubt it.