Casey Anthony found NOT Guilty - WOW

unbelievable....

http://www2.turnto10.com/news/2011/j...ial-ar-589304/

It makes me sick to my tummy....smh

Never watched one second of it. Don't know anything about it and don't care.

It is so sad, unreal She should get a state mandated hysterectomy!!

Must be the jury found it possible the baby drowned by accident in the pool, mom panicked because she's an @$$hole idiot (which her attorneys took pains to demonstrate in court so as the make the story believable), tried to dispose of the body, and lied to the cops. Hence the verdict, guilty, four counts, lying to the cops.

If they had just let the jury watch HLN, they would have convicted her of murder! But all they were allowed to see was evidence and testimony.

Must be the jury found it possible the baby drowned by accident in the pool, mom panicked because she's an @$$hole idiot (which her attorneys took pains to demonstrate in court so as the make the story believable), tried to dispose of the body, and lied to the cops. Hence the verdict, guilty, four counts, lying to the cops. Originally Posted by HlavinKitheri

And for all we know is true. I hate to say. And if a guy would have been found guilty anyways. Justice is not as blind as one would hope.

i thought for sure she we be found guilty on all counts but i guess the jury said no fingerprints, no cause of death, no eye witnesses,no dna, and reasonable doubt set in chaney mason is a good lawyer

But I am sure Roger Clemens will do jail time......the detriment to society that he is.

Just glad thats over, now FOX, can get back to my brainwashing ......Obama BAD 24/7/365....woooooo hoooooooo!!!

She claimed her father molested her when she was young. Perhaps her father was abusing her daughter as well, and she found out about it. The father was a cop, and perhaps he did in the little girl, and framed his daughter for it, therefore eliminating both threats from his life. He knew that her being a party girl would sink her with the police, and media. He looks like the kind of guy I would never trust

She claimed her father molested her when she was young. Perhaps her father was abusing her daughter as well, and she found out about it. The father was a cop, and perhaps he did in the little girl, and framed his daughter for it, therefore eliminating both threats from his life. He knew that her being a party girl would sink her with the police, and media. He looks like the kind of guy I would never trust Originally Posted by pantherpawz1

I was just talking to my uncle about this and that's his exact theory on the case.

And she parties for a month while the little girl is with "Zanny the nanny," cmon get freakin real, Casey Anthony is a sociopathic killer and liar. She's not innocent, just couldn't be proven guilty beyond a "reasonable doubt" Bulls**t I say.

Jesus, I'm going to come off like an asshole in this post. Which is pretty much the same way I came off IRL back when OJ murdered his ex-wife and her boyfriend. And this case is way, way less obvious than the facts of the OJ case.

The main thing is this: A jury vote or verdict for Not Guilty does not mean that the accused is innocent. If you are a juror, you have to rise above your natural feelings and do your fucking job. Judge the case on it's merits and abide by the rules of law. Not those of common opinion, or even common sense. You have to put aside your opinions, and honestly ask yourself if the prosecution has proven their case beyond a reasonable doubt. With actual evidence, and not innuendo.

Fuck that "beyond a shadow of a doubt" bullshit. I don't know what two-bit dickhead ever coined that phrase, and everyone is blaming the jury of this behavior, because, OMG! OUTRAGE! THE CHILDREN! Frankly, it's bullshit.

You might argue that common sense should be taken into account, but it really shouldn't be. Facts and only facts should be considered in the deliberation of the fate of any person on trial.

It's been reported that some of the jurors "felt sick" about their decision and at least one left the court room in tears. I salute every juror on that trial for fighting every instinct they had to render the decision that they did.

There was no evidence that proved guilt. No cause of death, no motive, not anything other than "well, who the fuck else would have killed her?" Being a basket case is not automatic grounds for the death penalty.

Absolutely zero evidence argued to the bench that even came close to the benchmark of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. It was a shitty fucking job those jurors had to do. I applaud the fortitude that they showed in putting forth the correct verdict.

I'm not saying that the verdict was right or just, I'm saying it was correct. And no, I'm not a lawyer.

well her release date is now july 17th but who knows they want to keep her safe so it could be a different day

Never watched one second of it. Don't know anything about it and don't care. Originally Posted by GP

Absolutely zero evidence argued to the bench that even came close to the benchmark of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. It was a shitty fucking job those jurors had to do. I applaud the fortitude that they showed in putting forth the correct verdict. Originally Posted by Kilgore Trout

I'm with GP - didn't follow it, don't know much of anything about it, and frankly, i preferred it that way. That said, i do know this: every single jury basher out there, were they to find themselves on trial for murder (whether they committed it or not) would prefer to have their fate in the hands of the jury, any jury, sitting in the courtroom, as opposed to the will of the majority of the people who followed the trial on Nancy Grace. And there's a damn good reason for that.