How Paula jones could be a thorn in Trump's ass...

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinio...z&ocid=U221DHP


The resulting case, Jones v. Clinton, went all the way to the Supreme Court, which held in a unanimous decision in 1997 that executive privilege did not protect a sitting president from lawsuits filed against him for private conduct.

Fake News. Perused the article and after 4 paragraphs the author never stated the "threat."

Fake News. Perused the article and after 4 paragraphs the author never stated the "threat." Originally Posted by gnadfly

In addition to humbling one president, the case set a powerful precedent for presidents who misbehave in their private lives — one that could get a workout under Trump’s administration. Jones v. Clinton is “horrible news” for Donald Trump, says Northeastern University law professor Daniel Urman. By far the most litigious president in American history, Trump and his various business entities have been involved in as many as 4,000 lawsuits over the years. Despite paying $25 million to settle three fraud lawsuits against Trump University just days before his inauguration, the new president faces, according to a USA Today count two weeks prior to the inauguration, 75 ongoing cases.

Why being so nice? Because SMI told you to?

I'm a nice guy...what is your excuse?

In addition to humbling one president, the case set a powerful precedent for presidents who misbehave in their private lives — one that could get a workout under Trump’s administration. Jones v. Clinton is “horrible news” for Donald Trump, says Northeastern University law professor Daniel Urman. By far the most litigious president in American history, Trump and his various business entities have been involved in as many as 4,000 lawsuits over the years. Despite paying $25 million to settle three fraud lawsuits against Trump University just days before his inauguration, the new president faces, according to a USA Today count two weeks prior to the inauguration, 75 ongoing cases. Originally Posted by WTF

So? Don't you think the Democrats would have exploited any of the 75 pre-election if they thought it was "impeachable?" That girl that Allred repped dropped out and that was the most damning thing the Dims had.

Another nothing burger or as you know it, a shit sandwich. Enjoy.

Still, another Dim fantasy. Throw around enough numbers and innuendo and hope something sticks.

Throw around enough numbers and innuendo and hope something sticks. Originally Posted by gnadfly

We are talking about 75 lawsuits, not Benghazi!

The reason each party does it is because it at times, works.

I must of lost you at "Don't you think..."

Still no credible threat. 75 nothing burgers. What's the most damning one? As I said, "just see what sticks."

Fake News for the hopeless.

: thumbsup:

(Bigkotex smiliecons added for emphasis)