Raped with a 3 Foot Steel Pipe, & Murdered A Gay Man

shitistan mosque the 0zombie, supports this and may have been involved with it.





HEY, CNN: Women’s March Speaker Was JAILED For THIS Anti-LGBT Crime — Is THAT News?

27 years in prison for what she did … and SPEAKER at the march??

At the ‘Pussy March’ we were ‘treated’ to a wide variety groups who have nothing in common except Leftism (besides George Soros funding) coming together to froth and curse about their hatred for Trump. Free speech is like that sometimes. Even the bankrolled kind.

But how can these same people turn a BLIND EYE to bonafide violent hate crimes that someone with a SPEAKING ROLE in the same march spent 27 years in jail for?

When the Left decides they want to destroy someone, they have a very effective system they employ. They dumpster-dive through the person’s past — sometimes going back decades — looking for something juicy enough that they think will ‘stick’.

The Pussy March was the outgrowth of that. Democrats dug up an embarrassing hot mic moment from Donald Trump a dozen or so years earlier, and make a ‘movement’ out of it.

They polarize and demonize the right for words.

They shunned Pro-life groups, remember?


But thes SAME leftists who ‘never forget’ allow a HORRIBLE woman to speak — Donna Hylton. With two other women she literally tortured a man to death (it took 20 days or so). She figured he was gay, so what did it matter that she shoved a three-foot bar up his rectum?


Note how she opens her address to the crowd:

this march is about us… the people…. the women in this country who refuse to be marginalized, sexualized, and abused in silence. She stands up and says she used to be known as inmate number something or other… and she plays the victim card. Oh, look how unfair it was for society to lock me away like that.

Lies.

Lies.

Lies.

Did she happen to mention WHY she was locked away for 27 years? Probably not.

She used the emotional buzzwords ‘marginalized’, ‘sexualized’, and ‘abused’ in the very first part of her address. She was trying to get the crowd emotionally invested in what she was going to say next.

Keep those words in mind as you read further.

The Spectator gave some context on what she did to land herself in prison for so long.

Does this sound like an innocent victim to you?

Vigliarole believed the three girls were prostitutes who were going to have sex with him. Instead, they picked him up on March 8 in Elmhurst, Queens, at Maria’s home, and drugged him to make him drowsy. Then they drove him to Selma’s apartment in Harlem. The apartment had already been prepared for an extended torture session: The closet door had been cut, a pot put in it for use as a toilet, the windows boarded.
For the next 15 to 20 days (police aren’t sure just when Vigliarole died), the man was starved, burned, beaten, and tortured. (Even 10 years later, Spurling could recall Rita’s chilling response when they questioned her about shoving a three-foot metal bar up Vigliarole’s rear: “He was a homo anyway.” How did she know? “When I stuck the bar up his rectum he wiggled.”)
The three girls took turns watching the man. It was Donna who delivered a ransom note and tape to a friend of Vigliarole’s, who was able to get a partial license plate number of the car she was driving. He notified the police, who traced the plate to a rental car facility. On April 6 the suspects were arrested, and detectives spent 36 hours straight interviewing the seven men and women. “We had to keep going back and forth and catch them in lies,” said Spurling. “It was a never-ending circle of lies.”
Spurling himself interviewed Donna: “I couldn’t believe this girl who was so intelligent and nice-looking could be so unemotional about what she was telling me she and her friends had done. They’d squeezed the victim’s testicles with a pair of pliers, beat him, burned him. Actually, I thought the judge’s sentence was lenient. Once a jailbird, always a jailbird.”
What does she do now?

Donna Hylton has a website where she focuses on women’s issues and prison reform:
Donna Hylton is a women’s rights activist and criminal justice reform advocate. Donna speaks publicly about the issues facing incarcerated women and girls and the significant impact the significant increase in the female prison population is having on families, children and our communities.
Should we feel SORRY for her? Should we elevate her to a position of social prominence?



In the interview above, she dares to explain her reason for going to the march this way:

We continue to be silenced… negated… villified… dehumanized. She stood up to say we’re here. We’re relevant. You MUST hear our stories.
Well now you have HEARD her story. More specifically, the man whose life she destroyed. And silenced. And dehumanized. The same torturous murder that led the incarceration on which her public platform rests.

Do you STILL want to give her a microphone?

Will LBGT give her a pass simply because she’s leftist like them?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0wztibnmiU
  • DSK
  • 01-28-2017, 09:29 PM
It doesn't make any sense. If conservatives had done this to a gay man, and he was speaking at a conservative conference, he would have been killed by leftists.
It doesn't make any sense. If conservatives had done this to a gay man, and he was speaking at a conservative conference, he would have been killed by leftists. Originally Posted by DSK

You may have ruined it for Luke_Greasy. He was hoping to get some attention from a angry black woman with a 3 ft steel pole. I hope she still wants to give him some!


JD Barleycorn's Avatar
It doesn't make any sense. If conservatives had done this to a gay man, and he was speaking at a conservative conference, he would have been killed by leftists. Originally Posted by DSK
He would not have been speaking at a conservative event. This is a leftist thing.
  • DSK
  • 01-29-2017, 01:41 PM
He would not have been speaking at a conservative event. This is a leftist thing. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Good point.

Another good point is that Asswipe is a faggot and would love for someone to stick a pipe and a gerbil up his ass.
  • DSK
  • 01-29-2017, 01:41 PM
You may have ruined it for Luke_Greasy. He was hoping to get some attention from a angry black woman with a 3 ft steel pole. I hope she still wants to give him some!


Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
Hopefully, she will seek him out and give him the attention he needs.
LexusLover's Avatar
In the future I'll have to put in some serious thought about doubles ...

.... and especially "triples"!
Munchmasterman's Avatar
shitistan mosque the 0zombie, supports this and may have been involved with it.







https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0wztibnmiU Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
So because of who spoke none of the issues are real? Because a woman who committed a heinous crime 27 years ago speaks out against a person who has shown a pattern against women? She doesn't act or expect to be treated like a victim. She admitted her part in the crime. Who better would know if prison reform is needed.

Too bad you didn't read the article the quotes came out of. It would help get the facts straight.

Like why would a gay guy hire 3 women to have sex with him?
Moot point since there is no mention of him being gay in the story.

The girl, Rita, who shoved the bar (not pipe) up his ass said she knew he was a "homo".
It wasn't a hate crime. It was a plain old money crime.

And as usual, the standard "Lies, lies, lies".
How about pointing one out?

Nothing excuses her crime. And y'all see her attempt at making something positive out her life as nothing but a shot at trump (the person with the pattern, not the single incident).

Like I said. Read the article. It was written in 1995.
LexusLover's Avatar
Moot point since there is no mention of him being gay in the story. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
I just figured it out. You post a whole bunch of bullshit so your can bury your stupid remarks in the middle hoping no one will see them.
So because of who spoke none of the issues are real? Because a woman who committed a heinous crime 27 years ago speaks out against a person who has shown a pattern against women? She doesn't act or expect to be treated like a victim. She admitted her part in the crime. Who better would know if prison reform is needed.

Too bad you didn't read the article the quotes came out of. It would help get the facts straight.

Like why would a gay guy hire 3 women to have sex with him?
Moot point since there is no mention of him being gay in the story.

The girl, Rita, who shoved the bar (not pipe) up his ass said she knew he was a "homo".
It wasn't a hate crime. It was a plain old money crime.

And as usual, the standard "Lies, lies, lies".
How about pointing one out?

Nothing excuses her crime. And y'all see her attempt at making something positive out her life as nothing but a shot at trump (the person with the pattern, not the single incident).

Like I said. Read the article. It was written in 1995. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

It's simple manassmuncher, NOT like your posts with all the [/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]... In Texas we would have been done with this trash 15-20 years ago. DEATH SENTENCE... 0zombie


fuck her and you baby killing communist worshipers...
Munchmasterman's Avatar
I just figured it out. You post a whole bunch of bullshit so your can bury your stupid remarks in the middle hoping no one will see them. Originally Posted by LexusLover
You just figured it out? That adding a fact that refutes a big portion of the premise of the post? Not gay no hate? Gay guys always hire 3 girls, right?
And as usual you chose to focus on the moot point. In this case it was the point that was identified as being moot.

There are 2 main types of people that claim something or someone etc. is stupid.. One of them can't explain or backup their words because they aren't used to being asked to prove something. They have no flexibility of action or thought. That would be you.

The other kind of person isn't afraid to be challenged because he can defend his position with facts, can explain where his opinions come from.
no challenge and you end up with 28000 posts "And then you'll have to eat your lunch all by yourself".
The way you always have.

Not because you're stupid. Because you're a flaming asshole.
Munchmasterman's Avatar
It's simple manassmuncher, NOT like your posts with all the [/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]... In Texas we would have been done with this trash 15-20 years ago. DEATH SENTENCE... 0zombie


fuck her and you baby killing communist worshipers... Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
You ought to be thanking me.
Because when all you can do is sputter and wave your arms with nothing to say that has anything to do with the facts as you rant on.......you'll always be able to bitch about the font. Which is easier to read than your squeals

Too bad the article isn't on video so you can't see why she wouldn't have probably gotten the death penalty. Who knows, maybe she would. It was up to the judge.

It doesn't bother you at all that your thread title was completely wrong other than the word murder. A true trumpy..
IADPOI!
You just figured it out? That adding a fact that refutes a big portion of the premise of the post? Not gay no hate? Gay guys always hire 3 girls, right?
And as usual you chose to focus on the moot point. In this case it was the point that was identified as being moot.

There are 2 main types of people that claim something or someone etc. is stupid.. One of them can't explain or backup their words because they aren't used to being asked to prove something. They have no flexibility of action or thought. That would be you.

The other kind of person isn't afraid to be challenged because he can defend his position with facts, can explain where his opinions come from.
no challenge and you end up with 28000 posts "And then you'll have to eat your lunch all by yourself".
The way you always have.

Not because you're stupid. Because you're a flaming asshole. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

There is a third kind, manassmuncher... like you


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KwPCnizUHs
It makes a big difference in sentencing to an 0zombie. If it was a
"pole" or a "pipe" shoved up a kidnapped/murdered mans ass... and whether he was "gay" or "not"?

Bring that shit to Texas, We will show you how to take care of this problem. I've been on a few juries!


Munchmasterman's Avatar
There is a third kind, manassmuncher... like you


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KwPCnizUHs Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
Members of the first group are quick to say stuff like that. Real slow on proof. Which brings us to your next batch of bullshit.
It makes a big difference in sentencing to an 0zombie. If it was a
"pole" or a "pipe" shoved up a kidnapped/murdered mans ass... and whether he was "gay" or "not"?

Bring that shit to Texas, We will show you how to take care of this problem. I've been on a few juries!


Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
If it didn't matter, why did you lie about it? And you act like me telling the truth is wrong Only to a liar and a serial liar at that.
You're ignorant. Plain and simple.
And I'll even tell you why.

A jury never would have heard he was gay or that he had a pipe shoved up his ass. They would have heard the truth, not your added bullshit. Bullshit from a guy too fucking lazy to read an article. And since there's no video in the jury room or box, the idea you could stay focused for a 2, 3, or 4 week trial is a joke.

Time for the word of the day.
Moot.
That's what all your bullshit is worth today. It means nothing because the judge decided the punishment