Obama Gives Foreign Cops New Police Powers in U.S.

This is how he will be able to do gun confiscation. Of course our military won't do it. Of course our cops won't do it... but these guys couldn't give 2 shits about us or our rights.

You hypocritical muthafuckas would be rioting in the streets if this were an old white republican president. But since this is your God, he can do no wrong.... sleep tight waterwings...











A little-discussed executive order from President Obama giving foreign cops new police powers in the United States by exempting them from such drudgery as compliance with the Freedom of Information Act is raising alarm among commentators who say INTERPOL already had most of the same privileges as diplomats. At David Horowitz’s Newsreal, Michael van der Galien said the issue is Obama’s expansion of President Ronald Reagan’s order from 1983 that originally granted those diplomatic privileges.
Reagan’s order carried certain exemptions requiring that INTERPOL operations be subject to several U.S. laws such as the Freedom of Information Act. Obama, however, removed those restrictions in his Dec. 16 amendment to Executive Order 12425.
That means, van der Galien wrote today, “this foreign law enforcement organization can operate free of an important safeguard against government and abuse.”
“‘Property and assets,’ including the organization’s records, cannot be searched or seized. Their physical locations are now immune from U.S. legal or investigative authorities,” he wrote.
Obama’s order said he was removing the Reagan limitations on INTERPOL:
“AMENDING EXECUTIVE ORDER 12425 DESIGNATING INTERPOL
AS A PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ENTITLED TO
ENJOY CERTAIN PRIVILEGES, EXEMPTIONS, AND IMMUNITIES
“By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words “except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act” and the semicolon that immediately precedes them,” he wrote.
At the ThreatsWatch.org website, authors Steve Schippert and Clyde Middleton gave their interpretation of the result.
“In light of what we know and can observe, it is our logical conclusion that President Obama’s Executive Order amending President Ronald Reagans’ 1983 EO 12425 and placing INTERPOL above the United States Constitution and beyond the legal reach of our own top law enforcement is a precursor to more damaging moves,” they wrote.
“When the paths on the road map converge – Iraq withdrawal, Guantánamo closure, perceived American image improved internationally, and an empowered INTERPOL in the United States – it is probable that President Barack Obama will once again make America a signatory to the International Criminal Court. It will be a move that surrenders American sovereignty to an international body whose INTERPOL enforcement arm has already been elevated above the Constitution and American domestic law enforcement,” they said.
“For an added and disturbing wrinkle, INTERPOL’s central operations office in the United States is within our own Justice Department offices. They are American law enforcement officers working under the aegis of INTERPOL within our own Justice Department. That they now operate with full diplomatic immunity and with ‘inviolable archives’ from within our own buildings should send red flags soaring into the clouds,” they said.
“Ultimately, a detailed verbal explanation is due the American public from the President of the United States detailing why an international law enforcement arm assisting a court we are not a signatory to has been elevated above our Constitution upon our soil.”
Records show that the original order designated INTERPOL as a public international organization. Reagan had extended “appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities,” but kept it subject to searches and seizures under appropriate legal circumstances.
Obama’s decision, analysts have concluded, exempted Interpol from all restrictions.
“This international law enforcement body now operates – now operates – on American soil beyond the reach of our own top law enforcement arm, the FBI, and is immune from Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) requests,” ThreatsWatch reported.
At the Patriot Room, it was explained there is a reason for a certain level of immunity.
“Before we get our knickers in a bunch, there is logic to this immunity. While we like our Constitution and laws, other countries like their Constitution and laws. It doesn’t matter if the concept of personal freedom is more expansive here. If we expect immunity in their country, we have to extend it to them here.”
But with Obama’s change, “It means that we have an international police force authorized to act within the United States that is no longer subject to 4th Amendment Search and Seizure.”
Anthony Martin at the Examiner noted the international agency now can operate in the U.S. will “full immunity” from U.S. laws and “with complete independence from oversight from the FBI.”
At National Review Andy McCarthy asked, “Why would we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies? Why is it suddenly necessary to have, within the Justice Department, a repository for stashing government files which, therefore, will be beyond the ability of Congress, American law-enforcement, the media, and the American people to scrutinize?”
At UNDispatch, which is a blog on the United Nations, Mark Leon Goldberg, who explained he worked at Interpol’s headquarters in France in 2002, said there isn’t much danger of INTERPOL agents whisking Americans off to jail. But he confirmed, “As to the specific reason why the Obama administration would decide, last week, to extend to INTERPOL the same suite of diplomatic privileges that are typically accorded to international organizations? I don’t have a good answer for that. My sense is that it probably has something to with the accessibility of INTERPOL’s secure criminal databases (on things like stolen passports and the like).”
But the Obama critics at the Obamafile weren’t convinced.
“By this EO, Obama has conferred diplomatic immunity upon INTERPOL, exemption from being subject to search and seizure by law enforcement, exemption from U.S. taxes, and immunity from FOIA requests, etc. … Does INTERPOL have a file on Obama – or his associations?”
Read original here: http://www.wnd.com/2009/12/120363/#l3LmRMeUbrFsLqgU.99

OH Good! a THREE year old article!

You really need a calendar that cycles beyond 28 days, girl!

does that make it less relevant since it is 3 years old? If you think so, then you must quit blaming Bush for what he did since what he did was several years ago and according to your logic shouldn't matter anymore. Now go back to sticking your head up your ass.

+1

BULLSHIT... This is just fishing for negative crap to post.

Obviously the Slunt ain't got no bidness. But she should learn how to do relevant searches on Google.

and satexasasshole -- you make no sense. Using your logic, we need to stop blaming the Jews for killing Jesus... But NOOOOO!

BTW -- Did you Hear? Nixon resigned. Yeah, I know it's an old story, but that doesn't make it less relevant,

Dumb dipshits!

BTW -- Did you Hear? Nixon resigned. Yeah, I know it's an old story, but that doesn't make it less relevant Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

hahaha...... really? i hadn't heard

Yeah. Nixon had more integrity than Obama.

, Mark Leon Goldberg, who explained he worked at Interpol’s headquarters in France in 2002, said there isn’t much danger of INTERPOL agents whisking Americans off to jail. But he confirmed, “As to the specific reason why the Obama administration would decide, last week, to extend to INTERPOL the same suite of diplomatic privileges that are typically accorded to international organizations? I don’t have a good answer for that. My sense is that it probably has something to with the accessibility of INTERPOL’s secure criminal databases (on things like stolen passports and the like).”
But the Obama critics at the Obamafile weren’t convinced. Originally Posted by LovingKayla

If you dumb shits could read a whole article and not just post what the Tea party Express e-mails you, you might not be so fooled by every one of these.

,
But the Obama critics at the Obamafile weren’t convinced. Originally Posted by LovingKayla

Why am I not suprised!

Hating Kayla and StupidOldLyingFart should get married. They could change their names to Mr. and Mrs. Jerry Fletcher and spend the rest of their lives being scared of their own shadows.

And they will live happily ever after!!!!!

Great post Whiny. Again!

You aren't getting older, you're getting more dishonest.

Please be more specific, Assup. What did I post that was dishonest?

does that make it less relevant since it is 3 years old? If you think so, then you must quit blaming Bush for what he did since what he did was several years ago and according to your logic shouldn't matter anymore. Now go back to sticking your head up your ass. Originally Posted by satexasguy

+2

Everything you post is dishonest, either in substance or intent. You are not a nice man. Nobody is willing to stand at your side, hobbyist or whooker.

You are an island. You stand alone.

Maybe that's why we get so many " look at me " posts every day from you.

Frankly, I wish you success with your egos anonymous classes. And expect a full report...

In other words, Assup, you got nothin', nothin' at all. As usual.

In other words, Assup, you got nothin', nothin' at all. As usual. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

what do you expect when you got