When you listen to some people, you have to be careful and understand that their their own personal experiences and feelings are reflected in their opinions. What I gathered earlier from ZiZeck two years ago is that he has issues with himself, and to hear that he has rationalized love as evil confirms there is an imbalance. I feel there are different kinds of loves and different levels of those loves.
When one speaks of love of the world, or as he put it 'universal love' or 'love the world', that doesn't mean that you personally love every being on the planet. Love for the world can be expressed as concern. And then conviction, the feeling that allows you to express that love for the world with actions is what I would describe as a different level of love. Even then we pick a cause that's close to our hearts and pour ourselves into it.
If I had to do the same thing with my love for a human being, at the top of my totem pole would be my daughter. Only she has the power to hurt my feelings or bring me the greatest joy with her actions and words. With others that I love(d), my family, past lovers, and the such, I can rationalize their actions immediately and with some, not even be affected by them. Not to say I don't love my mother/siblings, but they're adults. Certain events have shaped their rationale, and I'm just a pawn. No love lost. And I think it's because I love me more than I love them. But with my daughter (whom I love waay more than myself), since she is cut from my cloth, she is held to some invisible standard, and part of me wants her to be a mini-me. Only with her does it take a moment for me to understand that I raised her to use her own perceptions to decide what's best for her.
I understand what he means, because true love of a person can hurt (which the hurt may have been the thing that brought him to this conclusion), but where would we be without it?
As usual, great post, Nina!