There's a weird debate in the Men's Room (weird commentary on a thread) about "fake accounts" and if someone is truly "What they claim to be".
Right off - I can already see the issues; as nothing said anywhere is private anymore... (Hey, wanna laugh - there's a recent Youtube video floating around from Julie Swetnick's old TV reporter boyfriend who worked in Washington and is questioned about "leaks"... he says "What do you mean LEAKS??, there's no such thing as LEAKS! ANY sense that ANYTHING remains unknown in Washington or by the media anymore is a farce! EVERYTHING LEAKS!" lol)
...so I know, no system is going to be "perfect" and in some cases "WhiteKnight's" would still tell everything they read to whomever...
But it appears there are the following:
- Long term "lifetime Premium Access" account holders who have either never done a review, or have done one MANY years ago.
- New member's with only a single review.
...maybe, while "Premium access" can give you benefits... The "Men's Room" should be for more "active hobbyists"? I would challenge that if you are in there without a review in years, causing a ruckus... that maybe your "premium Membership" is nothing more than a license to Troll... or that you have failed to prove any validity to your position on matters discussed within.
I think they can still do that on Co-ed and Sandlot, without Men's Room access.
Just my 2 cents...
\Love the site, love the discussions, and always try my best to encourage good, polite discourse.
Scribe