Just Read the Law

JUST READ THE LAW: HILLARY IS DISQUALIFIED FROM HOLDING ANY FEDERAL OFFICE


http://defund.com/just-read-law-hill...edium=facebook

We’re so used to complicated problems that we occasionally overlook the obvious. Like fiddling around with some gadget, trying to get it to work when all you needed to do is plug it in.

Could the solution to the “problem” of Hillary running for president be just that simple? Did she really break the law — and would the penalty for breaking that law disqualify her from being president? The answers to those two questions are “yes,” and “yes.”

If someone were to ask you if there is a law that Hillary has broken that should end her campaign for president right now, you’d probably answer that the laws broken by Hillary are innumerable. But could you mention a specific law? Well, now you can, and it was hidden in plain sight. If we laypersons can figure it out, it sort of makes you wonder what the FBI was doing when investigating Hillary’s email server.

Apparently, the FBI forgot to visit the Cornell Law Library. Word for word from the Cornell Law Library Former United States Attorney General Michael Mukasey tells MSNBC that not only is Hillary Clinton’s private email server illegal, it “disqualifies” her from holding any federal office. Very specifically points to one federal law, Title 18. Section 2071.

So here’s the one law you need to know that should terminate her presidential campaign:

For those of us who do not have United States Code committed to memory, here’s what it says:”(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.”

Yes, it explicitly states “shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.”

So, yes, it really is that simple. Hillary is “disqualified from holding any office under the United States.” So the only question left really should be, who is going to replace her on the Democrat ticket?

Well spoke. And true.

JUST READ THE LAW: HILLARY IS DISQUALIFIED FROM HOLDING ANY FEDERAL OFFICE


http://defund.com/just-read-law-hill...edium=facebook

We’re so used to complicated problems that we occasionally overlook the obvious. Like fiddling around with some gadget, trying to get it to work when all you needed to do is plug it in.

Could the solution to the “problem” of Hillary running for president be just that simple? Did she really break the law — and would the penalty for breaking that law disqualify her from being president? The answers to those two questions are “yes,” and “yes.”

If someone were to ask you if there is a law that Hillary has broken that should end her campaign for president right now, you’d probably answer that the laws broken by Hillary are innumerable. But could you mention a specific law? Well, now you can, and it was hidden in plain sight. If we laypersons can figure it out, it sort of makes you wonder what the FBI was doing when investigating Hillary’s email server.

Apparently, the FBI forgot to visit the Cornell Law Library. Word for word from the Cornell Law Library Former United States Attorney General Michael Mukasey tells MSNBC that not only is Hillary Clinton’s private email server illegal, it “disqualifies” her from holding any federal office. Very specifically points to one federal law, Title 18. Section 2071.

So here’s the one law you need to know that should terminate her presidential campaign:

For those of us who do not have United States Code committed to memory, here’s what it says:”(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.”

Yes, it explicitly states “shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.”

So, yes, it really is that simple. Hillary is “disqualified from holding any office under the United States.” So the only question left really should be, who is going to replace her on the Democrat ticket? Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

1 - won't she have to be convicted by the court for the disqualifer to be in play

2 - how will she be disquallified when the justice dept. will not prosecute her

We know, from the facts, that this administration does not follow the law unless it suits their agendas.
Ignorance is no excuse except for Hillary and it appears she is the most ignorant of them all.

this justice department has shown itself time and time again to be infused with the same corruption rife in the dimocrat party

1 - won't she have to be convicted by the court for the disqualifer to be in play

2 - how will she be disquallified when the justice dept. will not prosecute her Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Correct.

The "Honorable" FBI Director Comey and the "Honorable" Attorney General Lynch flushed their respectability and honor down the toilet.

JUST READ THE LAW: HILLARY IS DISQUALIFIED FROM HOLDING ANY FEDERAL OFFICE


http://defund.com/just-read-law-hill...edium=facebook

We’re so used to complicated problems that we occasionally overlook the obvious. Like fiddling around with some gadget, trying to get it to work when all you needed to do is plug it in.

Could the solution to the “problem” of Hillary running for president be just that simple? Did she really break the law — and would the penalty for breaking that law disqualify her from being president? The answers to those two questions are “yes,” and “yes.”

If someone were to ask you if there is a law that Hillary has broken that should end her campaign for president right now, you’d probably answer that the laws broken by Hillary are innumerable. But could you mention a specific law? Well, now you can, and it was hidden in plain sight. If we laypersons can figure it out, it sort of makes you wonder what the FBI was doing when investigating Hillary’s email server.

Apparently, the FBI forgot to visit the Cornell Law Library. Word for word from the Cornell Law Library Former United States Attorney General Michael Mukasey tells MSNBC that not only is Hillary Clinton’s private email server illegal, it “disqualifies” her from holding any federal office. Very specifically points to one federal law, Title 18. Section 2071.

So here’s the one law you need to know that should terminate her presidential campaign:

For those of us who do not have United States Code committed to memory, here’s what it says:”(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.”

Yes, it explicitly states “shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.”

So, yes, it really is that simple. Hillary is “disqualified from holding any office under the United States.” So the only question left really should be, who is going to replace her on the Democrat ticket? Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

Exactly what papers, records, etc. did she have custody of?

Define "is."

Every single email she sent or received for one.

Exactly what papers, records, etc. did she have custody of? Originally Posted by papadee

Classified emails were stored on her personal server which was stored in her home.
July 2015 classified information us discovered on her server
January 2016 top secret information is discovered on her personal server

http://www.factcheck.org/2016/07/cli...d-information/

Her possession of classified information is fact. Unfortunately, the justice department has decided to overlook this fact (kinda like when a white cop sees a white guy commit a crime and let's him go to chase a black guy driving a nice car.)

Tens of thousands of pages of documentation were deleted and we will never know what was on them.
Phones and computers were destroyed to prevent discovery of further security violations.
Hillary staffers involved were granted immunity. (When is the last time someone needed immunity when they had done nothing wrong?)

As far as "exactly" what information she had cannot be released because it it CLASSIFIED!!!

We will never know about the ones she deleted. Just think of them as the equivalent of the 18 1/2 minutes of missing recording from the Watergate investigation.
Nixon resigned before he was prosecuted.
Hillary knows she doesn't have to resign due to her "privilege".

Despite the fact that she is legally disqualified and above the law, many people will vote for her. She might even win.

Only congress can stop her then and they don't exactly have a stellar track record.

Good luck America and be careful. You may get exactly what's coming to you.

So is having an email/copy of a document, the same as having THE document? Is having a copy of the Constitution the same as having the original?

And since we don't know what was on the emails, we're only guessing that they had been filed or deposited.

Are classified documents "filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States"?

They're gripping their deplorable asses offf

So is having an email/copy of a document, the same as having THE document? Is having a copy of the Constitution the same as having the original?

And since we don't know what was on the emails, we're only guessing that they had been filed or deposited.

Are classified documents "filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States"? Originally Posted by papadee

An electronic document is a document.
A digital picture is a picture

Dont be an idiot.

We dont have horses to ride to the saloon anymore pappy
Most drive a car to the club...

An electronic document is a document.
A digital picture is a picture

Dont be an idiot.

We dont have horses to ride to the saloon anymore pappy
Most drive a car to the club... Originally Posted by Gotyour6

But is an email copy, the document or a copy? I'm assuming that the law was intended to stop the destruction of the filed document. But destroying the copy of that document isn't the same. That's a legal argument, not a partisan one.

But is an email copy, the document or a copy? I'm assuming that the law was intended to stop the destruction of the filed document. But destroying the copy of that document isn't the same. That's a legal argument, not a partisan one. Originally Posted by papadee

these documents are all the same. it does not matter what form they are in; digital or hard copy; espcially if they are copies of the original document.