Read the full whistleblower complaint against Trump

nothing burger 2.0. hearsay and like Mueller's so-called obstruction allegations, based on news reports.



https://www.yahoo.com/news/full-whis...125238707.html


A declassified version of the whistleblower complaint over President Trump’s conversations with Ukrainian officials about a potential investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter was made public on Thursday morning.


In the 9-page complaint, dated August 12, the unnamed whistleblower cites conversations and details provided by "more than half a dozen U.S. officials,” alleging that Trump is “using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election.”


[5 key highlights from the whistleblower’s complaint against Trump]

The public release of the complaint comes a day after the White House released a memo summarizing Trump’s controversial July 25 phone call with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky in which Trump repeatedly urged Zelensky to investigate Biden and son, who sat on the board of a Ukrainian gas company during Biden’s term as vice president.


On Tuesday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced a formal impeachment inquiry into Trump’s behavior.

nothing burger 2.0. hearsay and like Mueller's so-called obstruction allegations, based on news reports.



https://www.yahoo.com/news/full-whis...125238707.html


A declassified version of the whistleblower complaint over President Trump’s conversations with Ukrainian officials about a potential investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter was made public on Thursday morning.


In the 9-page complaint, dated August 12, the unnamed whistleblower cites conversations and details provided by "more than half a dozen U.S. officials,” alleging that Trump is “using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election.”


[5 key highlights from the whistleblower’s complaint against Trump]

The public release of the complaint comes a day after the White House released a memo summarizing Trump’s controversial July 25 phone call with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky in which Trump repeatedly urged Zelensky to investigate Biden and son, who sat on the board of a Ukrainian gas company during Biden’s term as vice president.


On Tuesday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced a formal impeachment inquiry into Trump’s behavior. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

The whole complaint is based on secondhand knowledge, hearsay and news articles. Obviously written by Trump hating attorneys. Sound familiar?

To top it off, Adam Schiff gave an opening statement today concerning President Trumps phone conversation with the President of the Ukraine. Schiff just made up shit.

https://thehill.com/policy/national-...aphic-evidence

This is the guy who GUARANTEED he had the goods on President Trump before the Mueller Report was released.

Keep digging, Democrats. America is watching.

Yep. An all-out impeachment effort in search of a transgression that can reasonably be sold to the public as something that should be considered an impeachable offense. So far, so failed.


The "Russian collusion" narrative landed with a thud. The Mueller report similarly was nothing more than a busted flush. Will we soon see called strike three?


Pretty fair chance.


Here are a couple of other things that some Democratic partisan fools seem to be forgetting.


First, the House impeachment process involves a fucking trial - that is; in the legal sense. The defendant's attorneys therefore have a free hand to call all manner of witnesses. For instance, all sorts of people who served at the highest levels of the Obama administration. It doesn't take a lot of perspicacity to see that this could quickly get very embarrassing and very inconvenient for a number of high-profile Democrats (including Obama).


Second, as everyone participating in this forum undoubtedly knows, the probability of conviction by the Senate is approximately 0.0%.


Third, House impeachment followed by failure to convict would be more likely to redound to the benefit of Trump than to either Democratic congressional members or presidential candidates.


So Trump would then be able to claim "witch hunt" victimhood and vindication, and thus would be handed a big club with which to brutally bludgeon his tormentors - who would be seen as obsessed with a president they hate and consider illegitimate, rather than interested in pursuing better health care policy, good trade policy, or anything else designed to benefit the American middle class.

Yep. An all-out impeachment effort in search of a transgression that can reasonably be sold to the public as something that should be considered an impeachable offense. So far, so failed.


The "Russian collusion" narrative landed with a thud. The Mueller report similarly was nothing more than a busted flush. Will we soon see called strike three?


Pretty fair chance.


Here are a couple of other things that some Democratic partisan fools seem to be forgetting.


First, the House impeachment process involves a fucking trial - that is; in the legal sense. The defendant's attorneys therefore have a free hand to call all manner of witnesses. For instance, all sorts of people who served at the highest levels of the Obama administration. It doesn't take a lot of perspicacity to see that this could quickly get very embarrassing and very inconvenient for a number of high-profile Democrats (including Obama).


Second, as everyone participating in this forum undoubtedly knows, the probability of conviction by the Senate is approximately 0.0%.


Third, House impeachment followed by failure to convict would be more likely to redound to the benefit of Trump than to either Democratic congressional members or presidential candidates.


So Trump would then be able to claim "witch hunt" victimhood and vindication, and thus would be handed a big club with which to brutally bludgeon his tormentors - who would be seen as obsessed with a president they hate and consider illegitimate, rather than interested in pursuing better health care policy, good trade policy, or anything else designed to benefit the American middle class. Originally Posted by Ex-CEO

Just take the words of Trump about and to the Ukraine president. Are you saying he wasn't asking him to investigate Biden and his son, that he needed a favor? This is a witch hunt? Its all made up?

To top it off, Adam Schiff gave an opening statement today concerning President Trumps phone conversation with the President of the Ukraine. Schiff just made up shit.

https://thehill.com/policy/national-...aphic-evidence

This is the guy who GUARANTEED he had the goods on President Trump before the Mueller Report was released.

Keep digging, Democrats. America is watching. Originally Posted by Jackie S

This is all you need to know about the whole hoax. They're making it all up!

If they have such a solid case why do they need to make up (Adam) Schitt?

Schitt called it a "parody". Adam doesn't know the difference between parody and LIES!

Here's a reminder of what good parody is...



It's called a SCAM! That is exactly what the dimocRATS are trying to pull off!

This is all you need to know about the whole hoax. They're making it all up!

If they have such a solid case why do they need to make up (Adam) Schitt?

Schitt called it a "parody". Adam doesn't know the difference between parody and LIES!

Here's a reminder of what good parody is...



It's called a SCAM! That is exactly what the dimocRATS are trying to pull off! Originally Posted by gfejunkie

its all made up BFE. Its a hoax. Its Hillary. Impeaching him will all be a hoax to. It will be fake news

Schiff just proved he never had any evidence at all of collusion when he said this was the "most graphic evidence yet". and what does he have now? hearsay. the so-called "whistle blower" apparently isn't even a member of Intelligence and wasn't not even present during any of the call between Trump and the Ukraine president.


this is treason. by the Democrats to overthrow an elect result they didn't like and couldn't accept happened.

This is all you need to know about the whole hoax. They're making it all up!

If they have such a solid case why do they need to make up (Adam) Schitt?

Schitt called it a "parody". Adam doesn't know the difference between parody and LIES!
Originally Posted by gfejunkie

I'm going to humor you for just one post, although I don't think you believe anything you wrote. this is all made up? the transcript is phony? what exactly is fake about the transcript Trump himself released?

the parody was good, I thought.. I get your lack of finding humor, considering the real charges your team faces.

I'm going to humor you for just one post, although I don't think you believe anything you wrote. this is all made up? the transcript is phony? what exactly is fake about the transcript Trump himself released?

the parody was good, I thought.. I get your lack of finding humor, considering the real charges your team faces. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

I'm going to humor you.. what in the transcript is an impeachable offense?

Schiff just proved he never had any evidence at all of collusion when he said this was the "most graphic evidence yet". and what does he have now? hearsay. the so-called "whistle blower" apparently isn't even a member of Intelligence and wasn't not even present during any of the call between Trump and the Ukraine president.


this is treason. by the Democrats to overthrow an elect result they didn't like and couldn't accept happened. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

you really think what you wrote shows treason? you are beyond ridiculous. your team keeps going back to the idea that it is second-hand knowledge. that was one of the talking points Trump handed to your team, that OOPS, got into the Democrats' email.

so what that it is second hand? it was revealed to be completely accurate. that just means many people, and at least one person who leaked it to the whistleblower, know how rogue and lawless Trump is.

I'm going to humor you.. what in the transcript is an impeachable offense? Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

working with a Foreign Government to alter an election, and withholding appropriated funds to that Government if it didn't go along with the scheme.

you really think what you wrote shows treason? you are beyond ridiculous. your team keeps going back to the idea that it is second-hand knowledge. that was one of the talking points Trump handed to your team, that OOPS, got into the Democrats' email.

so what that it is second hand? it was revealed to be completely accurate. that just means many people, and at least one person who leaked it to the whistleblower, know how rogue and lawless Trump is. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

you'll vote for Trump again. you will ... because despite your constant "blame it all on Republicans" rhetoric you appear smart enough not to vote for Clinton, and you won't vote for Biden, Warren or Bernie. Mayor Buttpulg doesn't really have a chance, and neither does Andy "ying" yang. Burrito O'Dork anyone? BAHHAA. your girl Harris tanked, Fidel Castro never had a chance.

and once again you deflect by not stating what is impeachable in that transcript. all of it? is that your opinion?

thank you valued Trump voter!

btw the climate changed last night .. it rained.


BAHHAHAHAAAA

its all made up BFE. Its a hoax. Its Hillary. Impeaching him will all be a hoax to. It will be fake news Originally Posted by themystic

Not going to happen. Schitt schittcanned that when he lied on national television.

BTW, I'm hearing rumors that the "whistleblower" who had nothing but second and third hand information is actually a held over CIA John Brennan plant.

When that identity comes out (and it will) it's going to get really good. Remember, the President can declassify anything he wants to.

working with a Foreign Government to alter an election, and withholding appropriated funds to that Government if it didn't go along with the scheme. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

so we should give money to any corrupt government that wants it, right?

what's treasonous about questioning the new Ukraine administration's honesty? they have a known track record of corruption, and why are we even giving any money to them anyway? we need that money in the US, right??