The outrage by the crowd in Washington is unbelievable.
I see the media is ALL over this story...LOL!!
Originally Posted by bb1961
They are too busy still licking their chops at the prospect of torpedoing Kavenaugh to even give this the time of day.
Maybe the difference is
One is elected and one is appointed.
One has term limits and one is for a lifetime.
They both need to be investigated.
Originally Posted by txdot-guy
That is true, one is elected, one is apponted. BUT the difference I See is that Kavenaugh's accuser has no evidence. WHERE AS the one against ellison DOES!.
The Media is covering it. Do a quick google search for keith ellison and the three top links are to fox news, pioneer press, and the star tribune all within the last day.
Originally Posted by txdot-guy
And what's the key there. ALL 3 are conservative news groups. What BB is on about is "WHY IS NO OTHER media besides conservative ones, covering it"
The difference here is that Keith Ellison can be removed from office. If Kavanaugh is confirmed to the supreme court he could be there for the next 50 years.
Originally Posted by txdot-guy
You do realize there IS a process for removal of a Sitting Scotus judge, similar to the one for impeaching the President..
I want a supreme court justice confirmed that's free from controversy,
Originally Posted by txdot-guy
IF Trump nominates anyone, the left's going to do SOMETHING< to make 'controversy' swirl around them.