https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethba...ights-n2536605
the environmental wackos lost!!!! good. the owners of the private property won't be compelled to change the area to what it was 50 years ago.
it rare to see a 8-0 unanimous decision from the supreme court. they did, however, sent the case back to the lower court to look at the issue on the definition of habitat which apparently the lower court didn't look into.
the area in question does have ponds, so I don't know why they can't dump a few frogs there without changing the trees which are cypress trees. I'm dubious it needed to be broad leave trees.