The wine cave conundrum: Do Democrats want successful people in their party anymore?

https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/e...party-anymore/


Once upon a time, America felt pretty good about stories like Craig and Kathryn Hall’s.
Here are people who have worked hard their whole lives, made good investments and have given back to their communities and their country.
We used to find that inspiring and worth emulating. After all, Craig Hall is a guy who started off his billion-dollar development empire on $4,000 in savings from mowing lawns and selling Cutco. His wife had more of a step-up in life, perhaps, but she built on her beginnings, becoming a successful lawyer, executive and ambassador.
So why did the Halls — devoted Democrats — find themselves torn to bits as villains in the last Democratic debate?
The Halls are the owners of the now infamous wine cave in Napa, and they hosted Democratic candidate Pete Buttigieg there for a fundraiser — a fundraiser, mind you, where many around the table were regular folks who happen to have given the maximum individual donation (a whopping $2,800) to Buttigieg.



Sen. Elizabeth Warren, now leading the anti-success wing of the Democratic Party, zeroed in on the fundraiser during the last debate. (Nevermind that Warren has plenty history of her own with fancy fundraisers.)
“We made the decision many years ago that rich people in smoke-filled rooms would not pick the next president of the United States. Billionaires in wine caves should not pick the next president of the United States,” she said.
Other candidates, including Andrew Yang and Sen. Bernie Sanders, piled on.
This is a central problem for Democrats — the idea that success and “privilege” (an amorphous charge applied to certain people as convenient) are problems in themselves.





Where does that leave people like Craig and Kathryn Hall, who have employed their success to further causes of greater opportunity for all Americans, including launching a program to help women and minorities start successful businesses?
For Craig Hall, it means feeling like “a pawn.” For Kathryn Hall, it means she’d just rather not.
No one pretends the Halls haven’t benefited from their political associations. But we have to wonder if Democrats really would be better off jettisoning the successful Americans who support the party. And we have to wonder if you want a party where people who know how to make it in America are treated like enemies.
The American story has always included the chance to strike it big, to make it, to go from mowing lawns to owning vineyards.
If Democrats don’t want that story in their tent anymore, we expect the other side will embrace it gladly and consider it a privilege.


DPST's marginialize long term supporters if rich and white. Classic Plantation politics.

Yet the leaders - bernie, warren, biden - are all rich, elderly, whites.
Interesting to watch the radical leftist DPST's tear their party into tiny , irrelevant hypocritical lacunae.
LOL
Happy New Year.

“Plantation politics”. “DPST” Oebsy, you’re a humans toilets, young lady. You fill up your post with shits and it all spins around and goes the same place. Every singles time!

Seek Midol.

If you had money, you could buy your medical certifications back from Trump, eh?

Such a shame to waste a life in such Hateful fashion.

Get help - YR-Hoe - for your own sake.

Amusingly, politics is big business nowadays.
So if the Dims bite the hands that supply it, well, they can't win elections.
So....
the Dims are a party of fake morality?
the Dims actually want to enhance low paying jobs (immigrant discussion)
the Dims want to make the entire world follow their lead (NIMBY and Hitler connotations)

But what's behind the screen?
Still taking significant monetary donations, but from whom?

Gotta be amused be fake socialism.

The Dims are stuck into this conundrum were they need much of their identity politic followers to believe they are victims while at the same time have them feeding from the public trough. That trough is the biggest single enterprise on the planet: The US Govt. At the same time they need the rich people/corporations some control over that trough in order to do business.

In other words: Some pigs are more equal than others.

Deplorable PSTs, eh?

In other words: Some pigs are more equal than others. Originally Posted by gnadfly

a difference between "OINK, OINK, OINK!" and "oink, oink, oink!"

Deplorable PSTs, eh? Originally Posted by HoeHummer

Well played, you fucking basic.

oink...snick

https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/e...party-anymore/


Once upon a time, America felt pretty good about stories like Craig and Kathryn Hall’s.
Here are people who have worked hard their whole lives, made good investments and have given back to their communities and their country.
We used to find that inspiring and worth emulating. After all, Craig Hall is a guy who started off his billion-dollar development empire on $4,000 in savings from mowing lawns and selling Cutco. His wife had more of a step-up in life, perhaps, but she built on her beginnings, becoming a successful lawyer, executive and ambassador.
So why did the Halls — devoted Democrats — find themselves torn to bits as villains in the last Democratic debate?
The Halls are the owners of the now infamous wine cave in Napa, and they hosted Democratic candidate Pete Buttigieg there for a fundraiser — a fundraiser, mind you, where many around the table were regular folks who happen to have given the maximum individual donation (a whopping $2,800) to Buttigieg.



Sen. Elizabeth Warren, now leading the anti-success wing of the Democratic Party, zeroed in on the fundraiser during the last debate. (Nevermind that Warren has plenty history of her own with fancy fundraisers.)
“We made the decision many years ago that rich people in smoke-filled rooms would not pick the next president of the United States. Billionaires in wine caves should not pick the next president of the United States,” she said.
Other candidates, including Andrew Yang and Sen. Bernie Sanders, piled on.
This is a central problem for Democrats — the idea that success and “privilege” (an amorphous charge applied to certain people as convenient) are problems in themselves.





Where does that leave people like Craig and Kathryn Hall, who have employed their success to further causes of greater opportunity for all Americans, including launching a program to help women and minorities start successful businesses?
For Craig Hall, it means feeling like “a pawn.” For Kathryn Hall, it means she’d just rather not.
No one pretends the Halls haven’t benefited from their political associations. But we have to wonder if Democrats really would be better off jettisoning the successful Americans who support the party. And we have to wonder if you want a party where people who know how to make it in America are treated like enemies.
The American story has always included the chance to strike it big, to make it, to go from mowing lawns to owning vineyards.
If Democrats don’t want that story in their tent anymore, we expect the other side will embrace it gladly and consider it a privilege.


DPST's marginialize long term supporters if rich and white. Classic Plantation politics.

Yet the leaders - bernie, warren, biden - are all rich, elderly, whites.
Interesting to watch the radical leftist DPST's tear their party into tiny , irrelevant hypocritical lacunae.
LOL
Happy New Year. Originally Posted by oeb11

Fauxcohantus is mad that Craig Hall made billions building on her ancestors hallowed ground which should remain undeveloped.

oink...snick Originally Posted by winn dixie

Sig ... heil.

Sig ... heil. Originally Posted by HoeHummer

one things for sure.. you're definitely canuck.


you can't spell it right.

Sig ... heil. Originally Posted by HoeHummer

Fealty to the DPST National Socialist roots of the party!!!
Thank You.

Give your balls a tug, young lady.