Hillary's incredible fundraising numbers are astonishing!!!

Now there have been some hobbyist who find it comical to poke fun at Hillary's low crowd rallies in comparison to Trump's much larger number. In another thread I posted many links showing that having large rallies is no indication of voter turnout or success as Romney in 2012 drew rallies of 30,000 yet he lost big to Obama both in popular votes and the electoral college.
However, what is amazing is the amount of money Hillary has raised:http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/25/politi...016/index.html
The money she has raised has even beat the records set by Obama in 2008:
Hillary Clinton will headline her 371st -- and final -- fundraiser of the campaign Tuesday in Miami, according to a Clinton aide.

In total, Clinton's events will have raised more than $330 million, according to CNN's estimate based on ticket prices and attendance figures provided by the campaign.
Her time on the fundraising trail has paid off: Clinton has smashed records set by Barack Obama in 2008.
September marked Clinton's best month for fundraising, with more than $154 million raised for her campaign and associated Democratic groups. Those same groups raised $143 million in August.

When you compare Clinton's fundraising to Trump's it's not even close: Hillary Clinton and her allies have raised money from donors small and large, pursuing an all-of-the-above strategy to fund her bid to win the White House. Donald Trump’s unconventional campaign has relied on small dollar donors, a few big contributors, as well as the billionaire’s own deep pockets and star power. Here’s where they stand, according to the latest official tallies from the Federal Election Commission.

Just look at the figures- and let me remind you the money accounted for is from both small and large donors:

Hillary to Date has raised $766.6M compare to Trump's $392.1M
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/gr...n-fundraising/

So here's a question for you guys to ponder. While many of you are bragging about Trump's huge rallies- the numbers clearly show those people aren't donating to Trump's campaign they are merely people taking the day off from work to be at an event.
What would a Presidential candidate rather have 10,000 people show up at a rally and they contribute about 25k in donations or have 1000 people show up and they pledge 100K to the campaign?

And yet the Dims are the ones complaining about the Citizens United ruling when they are the chief beneficiaries.

Whatever you say just know that a few rich people financed Hillary. Besides , it takes 4 times more money by Hillary to get the results as Trump.

Yes, the Super wealthy support Hillary (so she can redistribute wealth and look out for the middle class)

Foreign governments give money to Hillary (so she can look out for American interests)

Yet somehow Trump is a puppet of a foreign government.

And yet the Dims are the ones complaining about the Citizens United ruling when they are the chief beneficiaries. Originally Posted by gnadfly

Exactly. Hillary says one of the first things she will do is overturn the Citizens United ruling by pushing for a constitutional amendment. Well, she can start by returning the millions of dollars that her campaign has received from the fat cats on Wall Street, who are the same people who have paid her millions for speeches she has given.

All of these Fat Cats know she can be bought. This is. Proven fact.

Depicable, lying, corrupt, money grubbing, sexual predator enabling cunt.

Now there have been some hobbyist who find it comical to poke fun at Hillary's low crowd rallies in comparison to Trump's much larger number. In another thread I posted many links showing that having large rallies is no indication of voter turnout or success as Romney in 2012 drew rallies of 30,000 yet he lost big to Obama both in popular votes and the electoral college.
However, what is amazing is the amount of money Hillary has raised:http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/25/politi...016/index.html
The money she has raised has even beat the records set by Obama in 2008:
Hillary Clinton will headline her 371st -- and final -- fundraiser of the campaign Tuesday in Miami, according to a Clinton aide.

In total, Clinton's events will have raised more than $330 million, according to CNN's estimate based on ticket prices and attendance figures provided by the campaign.
Her time on the fundraising trail has paid off: Clinton has smashed records set by Barack Obama in 2008.
September marked Clinton's best month for fundraising, with more than $154 million raised for her campaign and associated Democratic groups. Those same groups raised $143 million in August.

When you compare Clinton's fundraising to Trump's it's not even close: Hillary Clinton and her allies have raised money from donors small and large, pursuing an all-of-the-above strategy to fund her bid to win the White House. Donald Trump’s unconventional campaign has relied on small dollar donors, a few big contributors, as well as the billionaire’s own deep pockets and star power. Here’s where they stand, according to the latest official tallies from the Federal Election Commission.

Just look at the figures- and let me remind you the money accounted for is from both small and large donors:

Hillary to Date has raised $766.6M compare to Trump's $392.1M
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/gr...n-fundraising/

So here's a question for you guys to ponder. While many of you are bragging about Trump's huge rallies- the numbers clearly show those people aren't donating to Trump's campaign they are merely people taking the day off from work to be at an event.
What would a Presidential candidate rather have 10,000 people show up at a rally and they contribute about 25k in donations or have 1000 people show up and they pledge 100K to the campaign? Originally Posted by Luke_Wyatt

Forget rallies and donors, none of that really means anything. The final analysis is Hillary will not make a good president. It's not because she isn't qualified. It's because she is a criminal, a con artist and an overall crappy person. The majority of the 240 million stupid Americans that will undoubtedly vote for her are also the same. Carry on dummy, lol.


Jim

Yes, the Super wealthy support Hillary (so she can redistribute wealth and look out for the middle class)

Foreign governments give money to Hillary (so she can look out for American interests)

Yet somehow Trump is a puppet of a foreign government. Originally Posted by goodman0422

The super wealthy support her even though she's raising her taxes and Trump is giving the super wealthy a tax break- yeah that makes sense. She's raising more money to Trump by nearly 2 to 1- I bet those assholes who are attending Trump's rallies aren't donating a penny to his campaign nor buying his gold cards.
If Trump is so popular why doesn't the money reflect his popularity? If you remember during the primaries Trump boasted how he was raising far more money than any other GOP candidate and how great the polls are in his favor, yet he doesn't say a word about how Clinton is winning in the majority of the polls and is by far raising more money than Trump.

Now, if the shoe were on the other foot, you fucktards would be saying: Clinton isn't raising any moneyed Trump is winning in the polls, but since that's not the case all of sudden the polls are rigged and she got billionaires supporting her- go to hell assholes.

The super wealthy support her even though she's raising her taxes and Trump is giving the super wealthy a tax break- yeah that makes sense. She's raising more money to Trump by nearly 2 to 1- I bet those assholes who are attending Trump's rallies aren't donating a penny to his campaign nor buying his gold cards.
If Trump is so popular why doesn't the money reflect his popularity? If you remember during the primaries Trump boasted how he was raising far more money than any other GOP candidate and how great the polls are in his favor, yet he doesn't say a word about how Clinton is winning in the majority of the polls and is by far raising more money than Trump.

Now, if the shoe were on the other foot, you fucktards would be saying: Clinton isn't raising any moneyed Trump is winning in the polls, but since that's not the case all of sudden the polls are rigged and she got billionaires supporting her- go to hell assholes. Originally Posted by Luke_Wyatt

What are you going to do during your 90 days off from this forum?

The super wealthy support her even though she's raising her taxes and Trump is giving the super wealthy a tax break- yeah that makes sense...and she got billionaires supporting her- go to hell assholes. Originally Posted by Luke_Wyatt

Exactly my point. If her billionaires want to ay more taxes, they can. No one will stop them. We are led to believe, once again, that [I]this time[I]the rich will foot the bill to benefit the lower and middle class. Just like when the affordable care act shifted the health care cost of 20 million Americans to...people like me, the middle class. The monthly premium for my children's Healthcare increased by 60-70%. Copays increased by a smaller amount. The real kicker was in the cost of prescription meds for my son (one med went from $45 to over $800.)

The public Hillary tells you she's working for you. The private Hillary assures the elite that she will protect their interests. You want to believe that the public Hillary is the trustworthy one, you go right ahead. I would laugh if it weren't me that was actually going to pay for your mistake.

Yes, it makes sense that the wealthy support Hillary. They know her better than you do.

Exactly my point. If her billionaires want to ay more taxes, they can. No one will stop them. We are led to believe, once again, that [I]this time[I]the rich will foot the bill to benefit the lower and middle class. Just like when the affordable care act shifted the health care cost of 20 million Americans to...people like me, the middle class. The monthly premium for my children's Healthcare increased by 60-70%. Copays increased by a smaller amount. The real kicker was in the cost of prescription meds for my son (one med went from $45 to over $800.)

The public Hillary tells you she's working for you. The private Hillary assures the elite that she will protect their interests. You want to believe that the public Hillary is the trustworthy one, you go right ahead. I would laugh if it weren't me that was actually going to pay for your mistake.

Yes, it makes sense that the wealthy support Hillary. They know her better than you do. Originally Posted by goodman0422

Do you really think Trump cares about the average man and/or the middle class? The proof is in the pudding. Donald Trump is one of the least charitable billionaires in the world :http://newsexaminer.net/politics/don...e-billionaire/
There's a reason why he won't release his taxes- you are batshitcrazy if you think Trump gives a fuck about you or the common man- during the primaries he vowed not to raise the minimum wage.

Exactly my point. If her billionaires want to ay more taxes, they can. No one will stop them. We are led to believe, once again, that [I]this time[I]the rich will foot the bill to benefit the lower and middle class. Just like when the affordable care act shifted the health care cost of 20 million Americans to...people like me, the middle class. The monthly premium for my children's Healthcare increased by 60-70%. Copays increased by a smaller amount. The real kicker was in the cost of prescription meds for my son (one med went from $45 to over $800.)

The public Hillary tells you she's working for you. The private Hillary assures the elite that she will protect their interests. You want to believe that the public Hillary is the trustworthy one, you go right ahead. I would laugh if it weren't me that was actually going to pay for your mistake.

Yes, it makes sense that the wealthy support Hillary. They know her better than you do. Originally Posted by goodman0422

by the way let me just sum this up- take any political leader of any nation during any time and trust me there was some corruption. Politics is dirty this isn't charity or church and even some churches are corrupt when pastors are driving Rolls Royces and living in multi-millionaire homes there's corruption, but back to my point. The President is only a figurehead they all answer to someone or some people much more powerful- if you are really under the impression that Trump wouldn't be pulled by some strings you have no clue about politics.
Everyone answers to someone I don't care what political party they belong to that's just life- so don't feed me this bullshit that if Trump were to win he would be an outsider and wouldn't answer to anyone because that's pure bullshit.

Hillary is not raising funds, she is taking bribes.

Hillary is not raising funds, she is taking bribes. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Prove it or retract your statement!!!!

Umm, its all over the internet. It's called pay for play, I'm sure you heard of it.