Why weren't the Rittenhouse shooting videos shown from the start?

Wow, those videos were awesome. It was an open and shut case of self defense and never should have been prosecuted.

Kyle's detractors can only say bullshit like "but he crossed state lines" and "but if he was black....." "He shouldnt have been there, only rioters were supposed to be there".
https://youtu.be/iryQSpxSlrg

... WHY?

... HOW would the bullshit liberal media:
CBS, ABC, MSNBC, CNN and the newspaper outlets
ever be able to push their FALSE NARRATIVE
about the shootings - IF EVEERYONE COULD VIEW THE TRUTH.

Same way they couldn't SELL everybody on Trump/Russia collusion
IF they told everybody in-advance that it was ALL a made-up hoax.

Oh, uh, before I forget - ANY of you liberal lads see today
that CNN admitted that the whole thing was a made-up hoax.

Washington Post admitted this just the other day.

... The liberal viewers and readers WERE LIED TO and DUPED!
How do ya like that?

### Salty

Is this ANOTHER Benghazi thread?

Or another case of a kid getting his mama’s gun and killing someone with it?

Is this ANOTHER Benghazi thread?

Or another case of a kid getting his mama’s gun and killing someone with it? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

When logic fails, half-assed humor/insults will do, huh? Now knock it off with the rioting and clean some toilets.

When logic fails,..... Originally Posted by Turd Ferguson ATX

"logic"?

Rittenhouse is not a "public figure" ....

.... hopefully he will take it to the next level.

It's time for the lying sacks of shit to pay up!

Is this ANOTHER Benghazi thread?

Or another case of a kid getting his mama’s gun and killing someone with it? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

You did insinuate in many of your posts he was a convict but you're full of it as always!!
You repeat the same shit over and over again to increase your post count because you have nothing else...you're one sad libtard.

... Yssup is also entitled to his-own OPINION about this.

Just sayin' -- where you ya think CNN and MSNBC get
their viewers from? They NEED lads like him.

### Salty

There were videos on this very site shortly after the events. I remember looking at them and saying "clear self defense" on the last two shootings. However, the videos at that time were quite unclear about the first shooting - Rosenbaum. I have been worried all along that the Rosenbaum shooting might not hold up as self defense. Apparently, there was enough evidence that it did hold up as well.

Also, Rittenhouse apparently did shoot and miss the guy that got him with the flying drop kick. There has not been a whole lot about that, but since that produced no death or injury, the lack of attention to it makes sense. (Even though it weakens the "everyone involved was white" argument. The drop kick guy is black.)

There has been a whole lot of calling folks "white supremacists" for years now. Have there been any cases where an innocent victim of such a charge has been able to win a defamation suit? Just wondering.. all this discussion of whether Rittenhouse might get rich and not a word about precedent that I have seen (other than the public figure/not a public figure angle...)

The drop kick guy i Originally Posted by zont

are you aware that the drop kick guy offered to testify to the prosecution if they granted him immunity on aggravated assault charges?
this is the guy that precipitated the second attack that led to 2 shot.
That guy was completely ignored in this trial...wonder why

Simply put this was a rush to judgment by an out of touch D.A. who had to placate the blacks and socialists. Whatever happened to true grit D.A.s who really got tough on real crimes? Instead these "new" D.A.s take a look at cases through a political prism and not through the rule of law. Americans need to wake up and elect D.A.s who are not political. I know that is an oxymoron. Maybe we need a way to appoint non-partisan D.A.s via a commission.



As for any defamation lawsuit, they are difficult to succeed in the U.S. The whole 1st Amendment thing is kind of a problem. Also, one could argue that Rittenhouse became a public figure once charged, so it would be hard for him to claim not being a public figure. Finally, it would be hard for him to prove any financial loss. He could sue for intentional emotional distress. If this happened in Europe, it would be much easier to win for Kyle.


All in all, I'm sure he will be taken care of by some type of guardian Angel that will offer him a job or multi-millions for the rights to his story. Hell, he might get his own show on OAN or Fox News

zont:
"....... Rittenhouse might get rich ...."

The lawyers will recover their fees for the criminal case as well as the civil cases .... and Rittenhouse may get 25-30%.

Simply put this was a rush to judgment by an out of touch D.A. who had to placate the blacks and socialists.... Originally Posted by Jonn Snow

"judgment"?

The image of him pointing THE RIFLE at people in the courtroom with his finger on the trigger ...
.....should have suggested he had none!

That scene was after he put on the video clip with 10-15 "BLM" .... "protestors" .... in a group standing around with RIFLES IN SLINGS hanging off their bodies ....

... after the idiot proclaimed that anyone there with such a rifle was there to KILL!

If I didn't know better, I would have thought he was dropped off to lose the case.

Have there been any cases where an innocent victim of such a charge has been able to win a defamation suit? Just wondering.. all this discussion of whether Rittenhouse might get rich and not a word about precedent that I have seen (other than the public figure/not a public figure angle...) Originally Posted by zont

On the other hand maybe the families of the men who died will sue Rittenhouse to try to get money he'll make from his GoFundMe account and television appearances. Rittenhouse will be on Tucker Carlson on Monday evening.

On the other hand maybe the families of the men who died will sue Rittenhouse to try to get money he'll make from his GoFundMe account and television appearances. Rittenhouse will be on Tucker Carlson on Monday evening. Originally Posted by Tiny

GoFundMe denied rittenhouse a page immediately and people have been fired for giving $25 to his defense fund


his fund reportedly has 2 million in it. a lot of which will go to his current legal team. they earned it. they punked the prosecution.


of course the prosecution played a bad hand as bad as you can play it...