My first reaction when this happned was........"She must have been drunk"
Then when no report of intoxication surfaced, my reaction was, "she must be incredibly stupid".
Maybe there is something we don't know about this case. It would have to be something extremely mitigating to sway a jury to come back with anything but a guilty verdict.
I'm not buying all of the outrage crap the victims familly is spouting. This woman did not have evil racial hatred that lead her to murder a black man.
Her biggest fault is utter stupidity. It's a shame that a fine man is dead because of it.
Originally Posted by Jackie S
The victims family being outraged is surprising? "Your not buying it?". What lead you to the conclusion that the woman didn't have evil racial hatred to murder a black man? Did she give a statement? Is that going to be the defense attorneys position to the jury, " I'm sorry ladies and gentleman of the jury that my client just killed a fine man, their was zero motive, she's only guilty of being stupid"?
Hey Jackie you may be totally right but I sure as hell wouldn't want you sitting on my jury
Btw, should we give her 2 years for being white and stupid, or give her life with out parole for murder like they would a black person?
White and stupid is a great new strategy. It gets you a lot less time. You can basically sell your country out and get 2 weeks in jail based on the " I'm white and stupid" defense
Hell, now days you can become POTUS based on "I'm white and Stupid"