Review: Katie Waste of Time

Date: 6/29/2012
Provider: Katie2CherishU
Phone: 512-673-9520
Email Address: katie2cherishu@gmail.com
URL / Website: http://katie2cherishu.escortwebsite.com/
City: Austin
State: Texas
Address: US 290/ US 183
Appointment Type: Incall
Did the Appointment take place at the agreed-upon time?: No
Activities: -
Session Length: 1 hr
Fee: $$$.50
Hair Length and Color: Long Brown Curly
Age: 28
Smoking Status: I Couldn't Tell
Ethnic Background: White/Caucasian
Physical Description: Tall Large Breast Not girl on website
Recommendation: No

Thank you for being honest.

Can any other previous reviewers confirm this?

Wow just sent a pm but guess I'll pass. Thankkkkk youuuuu

By the way she was supposed to be in Houston for a few days and was a no show (look at her schedule and check Houston ads).

Player...sorry you left with a bad impression of her. I'm in Ausin on business and was lucky enough to see her earlier today and had a fantastic time with Katie. She is one of the most beautiful and down to earth providers I have ever seen. She is the defintion of GFE/ATF material. I find it odd that you have 4 posts and this one review and you just joined TODAY and you are trashing her because her photos are a little different. If you had been around a while you would know that some providers blur their faces and hide their tats to help hide who they are from some people that may now them. If the shoe were on the other foot would you show your face and all of your body so all of your friends/family can see what you are doing?

Count yourself lucky you even got an appointment to see her. She's one of the best out there.

I suggest those reading this post from a newbie read another review from a seasoned hobbiest.

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=485773

List of previous reviewers:
http://www.eccie.net/member.php?u=136999

Looks like he is from Houston and was pissed she decided not to go there so he figured he would try and trash her.

Looks like he is from Houston and was pissed she decided not to go there so he figured he would try and trash her. Originally Posted by geauxtigerstx

That's a conjecture, and it's quite a stretch arriving at that conclusion, IMHO. Sounds to me like OP had built up a high expectation of the provider and she failed to meet his expectation. Does not necessarily mean that the provider was bad; it's just that OP had placed a very high bar.

EDIT: Check OP's posting history. It supports my conclusion.

Looks like he is from Houston and was pissed she decided not to go there so he figured he would try and trash her. Originally Posted by geauxtigerstx

"And he would've gotten away with it too if hadn't been for those meddling kids and that dog."

Making me have mixed thoughts

BigChested I was in Austin for business since Geauxtigstx can read minds like most in Dallas. PM if you want to read her text msg etc. I think its odd if she is an ATF he hasn't reviewed her. Read her reviews but they are all different from light brown to dark brown to dirty blonde. From long wavy to thick and curly hair. 5-7 to 5-9 (girl i saw as 5-9). Is she 26, 27, 28 or 30? Great t&a but then long slender thin hips.....some tattoos in a couple reviews but no mention in others....may not be the same chick every time but location is the same and prices vary for 1/2 hour to hour. I am wondering if this is a managed location with a couple girls that generally look somewhat similarly rotating.....the girl in the pics was not girl I saw and none of those pics has tats!

I saw her yesterday, see my review. I think my review clearly tells you home much I like this girl. I have 22 reviews on ECCIE and 100+ on ASPD prior. This Player dude has a chip on his shoulder. Why do people do that?

Guys, I've seen Katie several times! That’s her in ALL the pictures. Not going to play WK here. This happens to all of us. Tattoos are very incriminating and most providers do care to share them. I did not feel Katie's were distracting at all. But then I couldn't take my eyes off those D'S LOL. She is a VERY beautiful lady. Her show case is accurate.


http://www.eccie.net/providers.php?do=view&id=136999