you not being able to read between the lines of my posting is surprising....but let me play along....even if I mrant it all why is it our business what the fuck Pyongyang does....do you feel the same. about Israel doing the same to the Palestininans? and as for Putin he's at the same level as Kim Jumng Ung only difference is he has nukes and America is forced to deal with him....
Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel
read between the lines? why don't you just try posting something less stupid, old boy.
if you made your case about Kim and Stalin you'd be pretty close to the mark. or the Chairman Mao would work too.
to claim Putin is the same as Kim is a typically asinine liberal view left over from Soviet days. news flash .. 1991 .. calling 1991 ... where is Marty McFly when you need him eh??
as for Israel, you clearly don't know shit. or you ignore history or both. the fact that Jerusalem exists at all is from the Israelite's who fled Egypt. where there some goat herder Palestinians hanging around in what is present day Israel? yep. so what? did they found Jerusalem? nope. did they get run off? yeah .. so what?
the Israelis became scattered from the land due to the Roman Empire's occupation of it. the Roman Empire later fell of course, and eventually lost control of that land.
the Palestinians had their chance for a home in 1947 and again in 1948. in 1947 they were offered all of Jerusalem .. all of it .. let that seep into your noggin will ya? and they REJECTED that settlement because the land was only 85% of what they claimed as territory. and of course none of their arab supporters would fess one 1 lousy acre of land in their countries for their "brothers" lol.
in 1948 the lines of the nation of Israel were re-drawn to include Jerusalem with a shared border of what would have been Palestine had they taken that deal. so they turned down two deals for a nation of their own, the first of which would have given them all of Jerusalem.
and the Israelis would likely have allowed it for a nation of their own, despite the fact that Jerusalem only exists because of the ancient Israelites founding it.
http://www.shamrak.com/Masada2000-Hi...fPalestine.htm
note the 1947 map .. in RED is what could have been Palestine .. including all of Jerusalem ..
then 1948 ..
the Palestinians turned down their own nation .. several times. not even giving them complete control of Jerusalem was enough .. it was only 85% ?? they should have taken it while they had the chance.
why didn't they? they didn't want a Jewish state to exist. period. they would have taken some little few acres as their own as long as no Jewish state existed.
the day after Israel was formally founded the arab world all declares war against the new country. and lost. then lost again several more times .. in 1967 and 1973.
why after being attacked should Israel have given back the Sinai desert to Egypt? but they did, out of the greater issue of preserving their own established borders and continued world support. mainly US support and to a lessor degree the UK.
this could be Israel today ...
of course this would have caused more wide scale attacks and likely the same results .. Israel wins and the Arabs lose.
the only reason then and now that there is no Palestine is because there is an Israel. the arabs being the hateful types just will not allow Israel to exist. but they haven't been able to do much about it in the last 40 years or so have they? and this with combined attacks by Egypt, Jordan and Syria.
so you speak of so-called treatment of Palestinians by Israel but you ignore or won't accept the fact that the Arab world has been hell bent to destroy Israel since the day after there was an Israel. Israel owns them nothing. just will allow a Palestinian state .. if it finally ends this regional conflict.
who's the impediment to peace in the middle east? it ain't Israel you retard.
