Dysfunction Modern Liberal Democrats Continue to Screw Up California

6.4 billion for a poorly constructed bridge in California, and a government coverup.

So much for the modern liberal transparency - they tried to keep some of the flaws off paper to avoid public disclosure.

http://www.sacbee.com/news/investiga...le2589402.html

Looks like more of the " I did not.." BS that the Clintons and the dumbascraps figure will work for their gruberized followers.

Looks like more of the " I did not.." BS that the Clintons and the dumbascraps figure will work for their gruberized followers. Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

Like Palin and her 'bridge to nowhere'? You palinized idiots.

6.4 billion for a poorly constructed bridge in California, and a government coverup.

So much for the modern liberal transparency - they tried to keep some of the flaws off paper to avoid public disclosure.

http://www.sacbee.com/news/investiga...le2589402.html Originally Posted by DSK

For every stupid move by a democrat that you can locate, there's an equally stupid and opposite move that's been made by a republican. Back and forth bullshit really doesn't solve anything.

When did Arnold become a Democrat? Flaws were covered up on HIS watch.

Grubergruber #gruber grubergruber.

Goober!

For every stupid move by a democrat that you can locate, there's an equally stupid and opposite move that's been made by a republican. Back and forth bullshit really doesn't solve anything. Originally Posted by WombRaider

You cannot just equate the two sides like that.

Who did more, what did they do, why did they do it, how many times - all that matters.

Just blame whitey and be done with it you racist.

When did Arnold become a Democrat? Flaws were covered up on HIS watch. Originally Posted by chefnerd

He is just one man trying to stem the tide of dysfunction in a state run for years by Democrats - take the successes with the failures boy.

When did Arnold become a Democrat? Flaws were covered up on HIS watch. Originally Posted by chefnerd

RINO

A RINO (Republican in Name Only) is an officeholder or candidate who is a member of the Republican Party, but holds views to the political left of most Republican voters, or simply does whatever the liberal media wants. The term "RINO" describes politicians who claim to be Republican but are in fact liberal or puppets of the liberal media, and therefore generally debase the winning conservative coalition base of the Republican Party.
RINOs are often Republican only to the extent it serves their own interests, and will abandon conservative principles as soon as it is in their own interests to do so. RINOs often provide support for raising taxes, abortion as a right, gay rights and gun control. Some RINOs have connections with Planned Parenthood or corporations that support goals of population control; other RINOs pay lip service to pro-life values while in practice not advancing those values.







.

..

You cannot just equate the two sides like that.

Who did more, what did they do, why did they do it, how many times - all that matters.

Just blame whitey and be done with it you racist. Originally Posted by DSK

You can do EXACTLY that.

He is just one man trying to stem the tide of dysfunction in a state run for years by Democrats - take the successes with the failures boy. Originally Posted by DSK

RINO

A RINO (Republican in Name Only) is an officeholder or candidate who is a member of the Republican Party, but holds views to the political left of most Republican voters, or simply does whatever the liberal media wants. The term "RINO" describes politicians who claim to be Republican but are in fact liberal or puppets of the liberal media, and therefore generally debase the winning conservative coalition base of the Republican Party.
RINOs are often Republican only to the extent it serves their own interests, and will abandon conservative principles as soon as it is in their own interests to do so. RINOs often provide support for raising taxes, abortion as a right, gay rights and gun control. Some RINOs have connections with Planned Parenthood or corporations that support goals of population control; other RINOs pay lip service to pro-life values while in practice not advancing those values. Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

So I guess you figure that Pete Wilson, George Deukmejian, and Ronald Reagan, Goodwin Knight, and Earl Warren all fall into the same categories. Hell, I bet you probably worship John Schmitz.

Why the fuck are we still letting the Chinese build anything important for us? They can't even do dog food safely.

All the cracked wells in the components were done by the Chinese company making some of the bridge parts. According to the article:

"Philip J. Stolarksi, a deputy chief for Caltrans’ Division of Engineering Services, agreed with Merrill. “For the Chinese, the weld standards were ‘suggestions,’ ” the report quoted Stolarski as saying."

Gotta love that. You tell them how to do it, then they just do it their way anyhow.

I thought the Dems in California were all in favor of American workers - especially unionized construction trades? What happened to all that rhetoric about fair wages and labor practices in other countries?

They went for cheap and got burned.

Like Palin and her 'bridge to nowhere'? You palinized idiots. Originally Posted by WombRaider

I don't see the relevance.

If you go to Alaska, there is no bridge. It was never built.

That is a big difference in that and having a Bridge built, and then saying "OOPS, we might have some problems with inferior construction and inferior materials", especially when millions cross it very month.

California waste treatment ...


San Diego ...