Kelly Ann Conway...Hatch Act

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncn...rom%20%251%24s

Fake news.

Yawn

Yawn Originally Posted by bambino

You know you want that fist...

You know you want that fist... Originally Posted by WTF

You must. You can’t stop bringing it up. But you can dream.

WTF dreams of kinky sex with gender fluid liberals.

The rest of us dream of hot sex with strong, confident conservative women.

WTF dreams of kinky sex with gender fluid liberals.

The rest of us dream of hot sex with strong, confident conservative women.


Originally Posted by lustylad

And her gun works!!!!!:

And her gun works!!!!!: Originally Posted by bambino

You'd know.

Fake news. Originally Posted by oeb11

What about this is fake news.



The Office of Special Counsel, an independent agency that enforces the act, said it sent a report to Trump detailing "numerous occasions" in which Conway violated the law by saying disparaging things about Democratic presidential candidates in television interviews and on social media while acting in her official capacity as counselor to the president.


If the office of special counsel says she is breaking the law then she should be, you know, FIRED.


If she wants to campaign for the president she shouldn't do so while being paid by the taxpayers.

And if a special counsel says someone is not guilty or there is not enough evidence to prove guilt...then....should they be....you know....left alone?

And if a special counsel says someone is not guilty or there is not enough evidence to prove guilt...then....should they be....you know....left alone? Originally Posted by FriscoKiddo

But that is not wtf the Special Counsel said about Trump.


That is wtf a watchdog group said about Kelly Ann though. She should be fired.

What about this is fake news.

The Office of Special Counsel, an independent agency that enforces the act, said it sent a report to Trump detailing "numerous occasions" in which Conway violated the law by saying disparaging things about Democratic presidential candidates in television interviews and on social media while acting in her official capacity as counselor to the president.

If the office of special counsel says she is breaking the law then she should be, you know, FIRED.

If she wants to campaign for the president she shouldn't do so while being paid by the taxpayers. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Seriously?

Well, alrighty then! Let's just fire everyone in DC on the taxpayers' dime since they ALL say bad things about each other on TV and on twitter every fucking day including Sunday.

How about if we start with Nancy Pelosi? She said some very disparaging things about trumpy today. Again. While she was on the taxpayers' dime. Imagine that.

You want to be consistent, right?

Why weren’t the Clintons fired for renting out the Lincoln bedroom to the Chi Coms? Oh never mind.

And if a special counsel says someone is not guilty or there is not enough evidence to prove guilt...then....should they be....you know....left alone? Originally Posted by FriscoKiddo

The special counsel gives the report to the person in charge with their recommendation. It's up to the person in charge to follow through.

In the case of Robert Mueller he gave the report to Congress. It's up to them to follow through with more investigation or impeachment as it's their job.

It's my opinion after reading the Mueller report that there was Russian interference in the 2016 election. That interference was for the benefit of Donald Trump and I do believe that Donald Trump obstructed the investigation at every opportunity.

"We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the President did commit a crime." -Robert Mueller

"We did not, however, make a determination as to whether OJ Simpson did commit a crime."

Does OJ go to trial then?

"We did not, however, make a determination as to whether Lyle and Erick Menendez did commit a crime."

Do Lyle and Erick go to trial?

"We did not, however, make a determination as to whether Scott Peterson did commit a crime."

Does Scott Peterson go to trial?

"We did not, however, make a determination as to whether President Clinton did commit a crime."

Oooops.....but that didn't happen with Clinton did it?

Seems to be a bit of a contrast here.