And a question on the subject..... If advertising providers "No Review Policies" are not supported by the board then why would any information relative to the Provider that can be made available by a reviewer be edited?
Originally Posted by Whispers
Here's two, Whispers...
1. Provider gave a close regular client of hers a personal phone number that is not the number she advertises as her contact method. He accidentally posts that in a review because she may not have reminded him not to. The number happens to be the same phone number her parents and children use to contact her. She finds out before it gets broadcast all over google in a link to an escort review and requests we replace the number with the correct, advertised number.....or "she will provide after screening"
You can bet your bottom dollar we will react quickly to a scenario like that and anyone who believes we should ignore that request and leave that info out there ought to have their head examined.
2. A hobbyist, fairly new to hobbying, writes a review of an independent girl and puts her EXACT physical address, apartment number and all, right there in the Location field of the review. Honest mistake..he doesn't know better. Somebody sees it, alerts us to the potential security risk of leaving that in public view.
This is another scenario that we'd be quick to react and replace the specific location info with something a little more vague and reasonable.
That's two i can think of right off the top of my head...im sure there are others. Rest assured, I'm the last damn person around here that would condone editing content from a post or review.....BUT, with that said, everyone should recognize that there are a small handful of specific reasons an edit makes sense..and those typically revolve around folk's safety, security, and privacy. It ain't censorship, thus no need to try and connect the two.
Good question, sir...thanks.
St. C