Use of The New Thread Button in Encounters

busternutzs's Avatar
Since there is a new thread button in the encounters section of the forum why don't you move a non encounter encounters here.

Including this report of Asian_Emily
Edit the NO recommendation and remove the report from her profile?

https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2615328

Are you going to tell me this goes in Coed Discussions?
lol

Still crying about this?
Moving this to co-ed.
lol

Still crying about this? Originally Posted by ElChupaNibre
Who's crying? It's the right thing that an issue was made of it. Maybe u don't understand purpose of the site??
Oldsailor64's Avatar
Mods took care of it. Was the right thing to do.
busternutzs's Avatar
lol

Still crying about this? Originally Posted by ElChupaNibre
Seems to me like you have become a Bordeline Cyber Stalker with your comments on my posts but not contributing to the threads.
Now it's back in Encounters. Poor move the moderators.

Curious about how the providers feel about this. Having encounter reports tied to their profile when they didn't even occur is not right.
Now it's back in Encounters. Poor move the moderators.

Curious about how the providers feel about this. Having encounter reports tied to their profile when they didn't even occur is not right. Originally Posted by ElBandido
I concur. Honestly I'm kinda shocked that CK moved it back, and I hope it is explained at some point. Makes zero sense. I'm confused? And if it is gonna be allowed to have a NO review and u never even saw someone, well I think that would be the day ECCIE is officially trash in my book.

Listen, I piss ppl off daily cause I ask a million questions or go with my gut when those questions aren't answered to my satisfaction and decide against seeing someone. Guys legit get butt hurt and it pisses them off for real. But I don't see anything wrong with it. We aren't obligated to suck anyone's cock or fuck anyone or meet someone. So how is this gonna fly? It then becomes a hostage situation and we r left to feel like we have to see ppl we don't want , just to avoid getting a NO review.

Someone explain it! CK?? Why did u move it back? Can't we know an explanation?
busternutzs's Avatar
Someone explain it! CK?? Why did u move it back? Can't we know an explanation? Originally Posted by Zgirl2
Why don't you copy the link of the report and ask the question in Questions for the staff?

I'd like to know why the thread was closed.

It's been my experience Mods don't like to be questioned as to the reasons they do things and they don't like to explain what goes on behind the scenes.
Interesting... the "encounter" no longer shows up under her profile. Very good. I hope that it stays that way.

I still believe, though, that they've set a bad standard with how this was handled.
utrlbk1976's Avatar
So, legit NCNS should be buried in Coed so future mongers can't find it? I don't have a dog in the fight. I just saw CK's response on the thread in question. Sounds like this girl should have plenty of good reviews to compensate. Not sure what the fight is all about. If I see a No review, I read it. I've seen plenty that seem baseless, but the info is there from which to form an opinion.
So, legit NCNS should be buried in Coed so future mongers can't find it? I don't have a dog in the fight. I just saw CK's response on the thread in question. Sounds like this girl should have plenty of good reviews to compensate. Not sure what the fight is all about. If I see a No review, I read it. I've seen plenty that seem baseless, but the info is there from which to form an opinion. Originally Posted by utrlbk1976

How u gonna review someone u have never met??

Reviews "yes or no" are there forever. And it's like badmouthing a burger joint U have never ate at. U can't comment on it, if u dont experience it. If it was ur job and ur money being affected, u might understand better. But it's no biggie to someone's life it doesn't effect.

It's always been this way, so changing it up is throwing everyone off.
Why don't you copy the link of the report and ask the question in Questions for the staff?

I'd like to know why the thread was closed.

It's been my experience Mods don't like to be questioned as to the reasons they do things and they don't like to explain what goes on behind the scenes. Originally Posted by busternutzs
I've never thought about doing that, I guess. I mean clearly they see all these convos and aren't really explaining why they are moving it back and forth and back.... didn't think it would make a difference if I posted it in the "question for mods" forum. I might give it a shot and see if it works

Usually CK is pretty good about explaining his reasoning before closing a thread or whatever decision is made. I'm Not trying to be disrespectful by any means.
OMG. This isn't some big conspiracy. The thread should never have been written in a review style, but because it was, it really doesn't matter where the hell it is. It's sort of a moot point now. CK closed it, so hopefully it will just float on down to Page 2 and beyond. It was a rare occurrence and I prefer it stay where it is.

If guys start writing copious NONEncounter Reports, the admin will have to decide what to do with them, like what happened back in the day with NCNS.


Move along, please. There is nothing to see here.
busternutzs's Avatar
I think some of you are missing the point it's not a review. We no long write reviews.

It's now a Encounter Report.

If you don't have the Encounter there is nothing to Report.