CNN Reports-----------Benghazi!

Yes, that liberal bastion CNN is now running with the story that dozens of hereto unknown CIA operatives were on the ground during the attack. CNN further reports that these agents are now being hidden from the public by various means including name changes like the witness protection program. Why? What is the big secret of this "phony" scandal. This goes back to the speculation of why ambassador Chris Stevens was in Benghazi and not Tripoli on Septermber 11th. We do know that Steven met with the Turkish ambassador but we don't know what about. Weapons! Yep, then and now that word keeps coming up. Weapons for the Syrian resistance. You know, the Muslim Brotherhood. Against the law of course without the consent of Congress. One hell of a phony scandal. First it's weapons for Mexican drug lords and now muslim terrorists.

http://www.upi.com/blog/2013/08/02/B...7481375474699/

http://cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/20...nghazi-attack/



CNN, finally getting on the ball and reporting the Fox News story.

Glen Beck (and several others) were the first to report on the gun running connections I referenced (posted in the Sandbox) the Glen Beck reporting months ago........................... .....

Yes, the story and speculation are actually about a year old but half the story is that this is CNN doing the reporting.

The ambassador worked for the CIA, that's why he wasn't in Tripoli. I "know" for a fact that many State people like the ones in this instance, are employees for the CIA NOT State. I cannot state for certain in the case of Libya...but in my past life...I know this to be fact. If we release the names of all these people on the ground.....you are essentially killing the covert intelligence network established in Libya. You are also at the same time killing their personal careers as CIA operatives. Geesh....some people can't see the obvious for all their biased beliefs.

By Frank J. Gaffney Jr.-The Washington Times Monday, October 22, 2012


Thanks to intrepid investigative reporting — notably by Bret Baier and Catherine Herridge at Fox News, Aaron Klein at WND.com and Clare Lopez at RadicalIslam.org — and information developed by congressional investigators, the mystery is beginning to unravel with regard to what happened that night and the reason for the subsequent, clumsy official cover-up now known as Benghazigate.

The evidence suggests that the Odumbo administration has not simply been engaging, legitimating, enriching and emboldening Islamists who have taken over or are ascendant in much of the Middle East. Starting in March 2011, when American diplomat J. Christopher Stevens was designated the liaison to the “opposition” in Libya, the Odumbo administration has been arming them, including jihadists like Abdelhakim Belhadj, leader of the al Qaeda franchise known as the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group.

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...mes on Twitter

The additional "story" is that the "locals" who were supposed to be for security were actually trainees to be sent to Syria, which is why they "evaporated" when the shit hit the fan .. just like the contractors who weren't supposed to be there either. Deniability, but it didn't play that way with all the questions and the refusal to directly address the issues just before the election. It backfired.... and is still backfiring.

A festering boil doesn't just simply dry up and disappear.

Oh look the wingers are finally changing their attacks from the State department to the CIA where it belonged from the start. Think the prisoners held by the CIA had anything to do with the attack ? Or the fact Stevens turned down more security?

Oh look the wingers are finally changing their attacks from the State department to the CIA where it belonged from the start. Think the prisoners held by the CIA had anything to do with the attack ? Or the fact Stevens turned down more security? Originally Posted by i'va biggen

It was not "the agency" .. they are not tasked with protecting diplomatic personnel. State is.

Hillary has already owned up to that .. so that is a done deal. It's on her watch and her head.

All are complicit in this matter.
My o my how corrupt this nation has become.

Did they attack and kill Americans with weapons Hillary provided them - is that what she is covering up?
Note, I'm not saying she did that, or that is what happened, I'm just asking.

All are complicit in this matter.
My o my how corrupt this nation's leaders have become. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

fixed for you

I "know for a fact" that TX is a moron. Usually the ambassador is NOT the CIA station chief or operative. The position is too high profile idiot. Usually some attache' or assistant. Someone anonymus.

Know one is demanding or asking for the names nimrod. They want to talk to them and get their story. Of course this is a phony scandal but then I guess you don't believe that. So what was going on? If you are so connected then please tell us what 007 was up to.

CNN are wingers???? Left wing oh yes.

It was not "the agency" .. they are not tasked with protecting diplomatic personnel. State is.

Hillary has already owned up to that .. so that is a done deal. It's on her watch and her head. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Apparently my statement was too deep for you.

The ambassador worked for the CIA, that's why he wasn't in Tripoli. I "know" for a fact that many State people like the ones in this instance, are employees for the CIA NOT State. I cannot state for certain in the case of Libya...but in my past life...I know this to be fact. If we release the names of all these people on the ground.....you are essentially killing the covert intelligence network established in Libya. You are also at the same time killing their personal careers as CIA operatives. Geesh....some people can't see the obvious for all their biased beliefs. Originally Posted by txrancher1

no, the morons don't have the capacity to reason at that level, other than a little backhanded sniping, you'll be lucky to get a response from the tribe of simpletons ..

"What difference, at this point, does it make about how it happened?"
Hillary Clinton

Looks like a big difference; arms/weapons.....hummmm.