Surprisingly little coverage by the media.
A lot of people don't even know he is dead.
Surprisingly little coverage by the media.If you have an email account on Yahoo, Gmail, AOL or watch ESPN you would know. Probably the University of Southern California's best running back to have ever played. Many think he was the second best running back in the NFL all time (behind Jim Brown). Unfortunately for him later on in life he had some issues.
A lot of people don't even know he is dead. Originally Posted by VitaMan
Unfortunately for him later on in life he had some issues.Chopping up two people in the street is now considered having “some issues”. That’s quite a forgiving description of what he did.
Most people may think he did it. Most people think Ms Anthony was guilty too ( A famous trial in Florida regarding forbiden topic)
That’s quite a forgiving description of what he did. Originally Posted by CreatedInSpace
... It WAS rather unfortunate for O.J. to have those issuesSimpson did not testify. So how could you tell he was acting?
later in life - and surely MORE unfortunate for the Dead people.
And O.J. there didn't think that HE was good at acting?!
... From what video clips I saw of the trial - I surely thought
O.J. was a great actor...
#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again
... It WAS rather unfortunate for O.J. to have those issuesIt was one of his best works.
later in life - and surely MORE unfortunate for the Dead people.
And O.J. there didn't think that HE was good at acting?!
... From what video clips I saw of the trial - I surely thought
O.J. was a great actor...
#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again
Most people may think he did it. Most people think Ms Anthony was guilty too ( A famous trial in Florida regarding forbiden topic)Either that or flaming leftist Garcetti did everything he could to insure defeat, including getting the trial moved so the jury would have the preferred skin tone. Everyone knows the guy did it. A juror even admitted they all knew too but wanted payback. Like it or don’t, OJ got off because he was black and the victims were white.
1. It is very difficult to win a conviction when the weapon is not found. Ask any prosecutor or defense attorney you know.
2. In both trials (Simpson/Anthony) the defense side had slightly better lawyers than the prosecution side. In the Simpson case prosecutor Marcia Clark was undefeated as a prosecutor before the Simpson case.
3. In the Simpson case the prosecution could not get around certain facts, that led to an element of doubt.
- The gloves did not fit.
- The blood drops that were found was not clotted blood.
- No weapon was ever found.
- On the same day in the afternoon Simpson attended a dance recital for their daughter. There were no problems at that event.
- It would be very difficult for anyone to go from Nicole's house back to Simpson's house and then get to L.A. Airport in under 40-45 minutes. Do you know how far Brentwood (where O.J. lived) is from L.A. airport? It's not close. Simpson was on a flight that night at 11:00 pm. No unusual behavior of Simpson was observed on that flight.
People can think what they want to think. With the Simpson and Anthony cases no one knows for sure.
I am not a Lawyer or para legal. I am familiar with the U.C.L.A campus. Brentwood is right next to U.C.L.A. Originally Posted by adav8s28
Either that or flaming leftist Garcetti did everything he could to insure defeat, including getting the trial moved so the jury would have the preferred skin tone. Everyone knows the guy did it. A juror even admitted they all knew too but wanted payback. Like it or don’t, OJ got off because he was black and the victims were white.90% is not enough to convict. At best there should have been a hung jury. Then the D.A. gets to decide to retry the case. The lack of a weapon and the fact that the gloves did not fit were a major problem for the prosecution.
https://twitter.com/wayotworld/statu...ob41ujZWjlYysQ Originally Posted by CreatedInSpace
You're making assumptions. If the defendant had the same amount of resources as Simpson, the outcome of the trial could have been the same. Again, very difficult to win a conviction when the weapon was never found. Plus, the state of Calif does not have the death penalty. So, your statement is flawed in multiple ways.
The entire fiasco is anchored in racism, any white guy would’ve got strung up for killing his ex. Originally Posted by CreatedInSpace