Oh yes It's a great plan. Let's see? Some guy knocks her up and then I will pay for it. Why didn't I think of that. lol
I'm just kidding. I just think pregnancy should move the woman to a different plane. She should put the kid first. She might think of doing something else during that time. I know I might get shit for that but it's my opinion
Originally Posted by burkalini
Perhaps by providing, she IS putting the child first, especially if providing is her sole source of income. You think her stopping and getting a job at McDonald's instead, making $7.25 an hour before taxes is going to do more for the child than making $200+ an hour*?
Sorry, but your post smells a bit misogynist to me. If pregnant providers aren't your thing, that's totally cool, and I totally get that. But for you to think that you know better than a woman (no matter her condition) who she should and shouldn't have sex with, and for you to look down your nose at her for making a decision to do what she needs to do to look after her child, isn't so cool in my books.
But that's just my opinion.
*yeah, I know that many providers do have other sources of income, much better and higher-paying, beyond McDonalds- it's just used as an example