I told you guys once before...consistency in moderation...you all need to get on the same page...
I'm not arguing points, simply because with this mod it's a waste of my time to argue points he issues to me. I'm inquiring about the length of time before points expire. I have three active sets of points, two for "Unnecessary Rudeness" (again, I'm not going to start on that rule or how arbitrarily it is applied) and one for "Disrespect to Staff Member". My "Disrespect to Staff Member" infraction expires in what appears to be 180 days. Six months for disrespecting a mod, no problem that must be the standard.
Here's the problem. My first "Unnecessary Rudeness" infraction from a mod in the National forums expires in what seems like 360 days. A year for rudeness, especially when it's so arbitrary in its application seems excessive, and in view of my "Disrespect to Staff Member" expiring in 180 days. However if that's the standard then that's the standard and I don't have a problem with it. Now my latest set of points, again, for "Unnecessary Rudeness", expires in 480 days...
Seriously...
Feel free to explain how you all consistently and even handedly apply the application of infractions here in Houston. That's my question to the Staff. Explain your "standard" for this, because the conduct from this moderator, in the absence of standards, is beginning to seem "arbitrary and capricious", and is exactly what I warned you all about when we had this discussion concerning the placement of Alerts and consistency in moderation. After all that discussion we're already back to this again?
So...please explain the board, or at the very least, Houston standards for length of time on infractions and how it is determined.