Judge says restart DACA

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattve...-daca-n2506690


Trump should ignore the judge.


theres the other one in texas where daca lawsuit was being restarted. anyone know the status of that one.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattve...-daca-n2506690


Trump should ignore the judge.


theres the other one in texas where daca lawsuit was being restarted. anyone know the status of that one. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

TRUMP SHOULD IGNORE THE JUDGE? What do you suggest, BONE COLLECTOR, that he holes up in the WH with a cache of guns?

You are ridiculous and nothing remotely resembling a law-abiding citizen!

They should come take your squirrel rifle away.

He won’t be able to ignore the judge that puts him out of our misery!

yes he can. DACA is an executive order that can be terminated at any time.

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-n...05-story.html#

Depends on if they will build his wall.

Obama ignored a judges order several times. The DOJ was called on the carpet for it and ordered to implement several programs. Don't know if they did.

Ahhh so now it's all about the power of the Executive Branch?

When they subpoena him, will he ignore it?

When they indict him, will he ignore it?

When they convict him, will he ignore it?

They'll find him in Contempt of America.

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-n...05-story.html#

Depends on if they will build his wall. Originally Posted by bamscram

the article was written in march 2018. as you can, the proposal went nowhere. its now August.


it makes no mention of the Texas case which was revived to challenge the other 2 Pro-DACA cases.

Ahhh so now it's all about the power of the Executive Branch?

When they subpoena him, will he ignore it?

When they indict him, will he ignore it?

When they convict him, will he ignore it?

They'll find him in Contempt of America. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Yes
Yes
Yes
No

a classic example of legislating from the bench. but in this case, it's not even legislation. from the article .. which of course is written with a liberal slant but even liberals know the truth .. even if they won't speak it ..

"DACA is controversial. It’s a constitutionally questionable executive order from the Obama era, which many have argued is a violation of separation of powers."

so U.S. District Judge John "Liberal Jackass" Bates thinks he can implement non-existing legislation based on an executive order that is solely the right of the President to issue?

hahahahahahahaahaa

Naw, let’s legislate for, the Supreme Court...

You can’t have it both ways, WWE, though I have heard you’re always ready to take it in two holes. So maybe YOU can have it both ways!

HANAHAHAHAHAHAHAHSHSHFH)IN!!!!

Naw, let’s legislate for, the Supreme Court...

You can’t have it both ways, WWE, though I have heard you’re always ready to take it in two holes. So maybe YOU can have it both ways!

HANAHAHAHAHAHAHAHSHSHFH)IN!!!! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

executive orders aren't binding legislation. no matter what the mulatto Manchurian candidate thought. what did Bill Clinton say .. "stroke of a pen, law of the land. kinda cool eh?" oh excuse me it was Paul Begala.


Paul Begala Paul Begala (born 12 May 1961) is a political consultant, commentator and was an advisor to President Bill Clinton.


https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Paul_Begala


you should be clubbed to death like a seal!





hahahahahahaahahahahahaaaaa

I would love to have seen trump tell that judge "Make me!".. BUT i am glad that sessions' is appealing it all the way up to the scotus. to ONCE AND FOR ALL, rule on whether DACA was unconstitutional or not.

Just curious. Are the thousands and thousands of kids that have been smuggled into the Country since President Obama issued the DACA Executive Order also part of the program.

Where does it end?

I would love to have seen trump tell that judge "Make me!".. BUT i am glad that sessions' is appealing it all the way up to the scotus. to ONCE AND FOR ALL, rule on whether DACA was unconstitutional or not. Originally Posted by garhkal

Of course you would.

Don’t you ever get tired of taking the path of lawlessness?

You can’t have it both ways, WWE, though I have heard you’re always ready to take it in two holes. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

You can't? Then why are you arguing that odumbo's EOs are legally binding and trump's aren't?

And how many holes do you take it in, oinkboy?