Say "Hello" to the new Arizona Senator, Jon Kyl!

.

Former Arizona U.S. Sen. Jon Kyl to replace John McCain

Kyl's appointment will make it possible for him to vote for ... [Kavanaugh's confirmation].

[Kyl, the Republican lawyer-turned-lobbyist, was tapped in July to help guide Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh through the confirmation process in a role informally called sherpa.]

By state law the senator will have to be a member of the same party as the departing one, in this case the GOP.

(The Chicago Tribune)

Every comment I've heard on his appointment has been positive.

He may be a great fit for Arizona. Seems like it for sure.

But that doesn't make Kavanaugh a good choice for America... only for Trumpler.

But that doesn't make Kavanaugh a good choice for America... only for Trumpler. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Give it up, yssup. You don't have a single reason of SUBSTANCE why Brett Kavanaugh is not a good choice for America. How many of his 300+ DC appeals court opinions are you even familiar with? It's a gold mine for any discussion of SUBSTANCE. Too bad you can't play, yssup.

This is the only one that matters. Trump picked someone who'd have his back during the next stage of his coup. Checks and balances, right? Trump has sought to circumvent them all, using his small, er, base as the tool.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.81048ec35ace

That's twice now you've told me what to do. I wish you'd open your mind a little bit, lustylad. The personal attacks and "assessments" are getting tedious.

This is the only one that matters. Trump picked someone who'd have his back during the next stage of his coup.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.81048ec35ace Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Did you read your own link? Kavanaugh based his views partly on his own experience working for Ken Starr in the 1990s. He saw first-hand how unchecked lawsuits and over-reaching investigations can distract a sitting President. He concluded that isn't good for America. Didn't you just say you want someone who's good for America?

Plus he wrote this in the Minnesota Law Review back in 2009, years before Trumpy ran for President.

But nice try using the WaPo to pretend you know how to talk substance. You lose.

Stop...

Sorry, wakeup. Still waiting for an intelligent liberal to show up here and lift the qualify of debate in this forum. I might as well be looking for a unicorn.

https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1839056

Sorry, wakeup. Still waiting for an intelligent liberal to show up here and lift the qualify of debate in this forum. I might as well be looking for a unicorn.

https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1839056 Originally Posted by lustylad

I think you make an excellent point both here and in your cogent remarks concerning the appointment of the Honorable Mr. Kyl.

Please keep up your important contributions to this forum.

I'd have to do more reading up on Kyl before making any real comments on him.

This is the only one that matters. Trump picked someone who'd have his back during the next stage of his coup. Checks and balances, right? Trump has sought to circumvent them all, using his small, er, base as the tool.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.81048ec35ace

That's twice now you've told me what to do. I wish you'd open your mind a little bit, lustylad. The personal attacks and "assessments" are getting tedious. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

We should ALL hang our hats on the words in the WaPo.
I'm worried the world to going to come to end if he is nominated...that is what the WaPo says...

Still waiting for an intelligent liberal to show up here... Originally Posted by lustylad

You realize that as soon as you added the word “here”, you automatically insulted all the liberals that are already here by saying that none of them are intelligent...you now see that, right? I’m actually going to give you a pass here...because some of you still do not get it...but no more.

There we’re actually two days during the week of the 19th that I didn’t issue a single point...then last week y’all blew it up again. I guess the point isn’t getting through...things are going to have to change.

You realize that as soon as you added the word “here”, you automatically insulted all the liberals that are already here by saying that none of them are intelligent...you now see that, right? I’m actually going to give you a pass here...because some of you still do not get it...but no more.

There we’re actually two days during the week of the 19th that I didn’t issue a single point...then last week y’all blew it up again. I guess the point isn’t getting through...things are going to have to change. Originally Posted by Wakeup

so you're saying a insulting a group by identity is not allowed?

Y’all can insult Democrats and Republicans all you want, right up until you can’t anymore. As soon as you insult Democrat or Republican members in this forum, you’ve crossed the line...as I explained...

See folks, that’s why I warned y’all so many times. When you prepare an insult for someone, and you try to be cute with it, you very often fail without even realizing it. I realize your fails...every time...

so you're saying a insulting a group by identity is not allowed? Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

The day you can no longer insult Democrats or Republicans in general without being specific is the day I'd encourage you all the abandon this forum enmass. If you stay under such conditions then it would be a travesty. No way I'd subject myself to that type of ridiculousness...dont get me wrong I like insulting in general but I wont tip toe through the tulips I will leave that to yall...if yall had any pride yall would abandon this place and find other all insult political forums...