For those that have not written a review before or those who are not sure how to write one or in need of some fine tuning, take a moment to read through this thread. I have provided a basic format to use when writing a review as well as some samples for you to refer to.
If you are having trouble getting started on how to format a review, here is a simple suggestion. Start out with a review in three parts.
Part I: This will serve as an introduction that will precede your BCD comments where you describe the activities. Tell us about how you contacted her, something about her screening, perhaps what it was about her that interested you, such as the reviews you had already read of her or the new pictures in her website. Anything you share here can help others. Was her incall easy to find and clean? Were there candles lit or music playing? What was she wearing? Did you all talk for a few minutes or maybe you all shared a glass of wine? Use this part of the review to share first impressions you may have had, anything that may have dissapointed you such as the room smelling like smoke, this is an opportunity for you to give the readers as much information as you can that will lead up to the next part of the review, the main body where you will describe the BCD activities you enjoyed or did not enjoy.
Part II This is the area where you will tell us about the activities you enjoyed or did not enjoy. Being graphic is not a requirement, being accurate is. Tell us in your own words in a way you are comfortable writing how the ' playtime' went. Was the kissing light or was it deep with tongue? How was her reaction to DATY? What positions did you enjoy? Tell us how her BJ was, was it sloppy and wet? Did she use lotions or oils for a HJ? Were multiple positions enjoyed? Were multiple bells allowed? Did the session seem to flow naturally or did the session seem to be scripted and/or mechanical on her end? As you can see there are many topics to cover. A good way to decide where to start here is to ask yourself if it was you reading the review, what would you want to know? Most likely others reading your review will want to know the same thing you would want to read or know. One way to start writing reviews is to simply take the activities you listed in the review form and describe them in greater detail. That would be a good start and as you become more comfortable writing you can expand this middle section and also start to develop new writing styles.
Part III This is going to be where you wrap things up and conclude the review. Did she meet expectations? Would you go back and why or why not? Was it one of the better times you have had in the hobby or did it just do the trick? What could have made the session better? Was there anything you noticed or experienced that might be noteworthy for other hobbyists? What did you like best or least about the session? Were the reviews you read in the past consistant with your session? Use this part to simply summarize your experience and give as much information as you can, the more information you can share the more value your review will have.
Some other thoughts on Reviews
This three part format is not a requirement, just a suggestion to organize and get started. As one becomes more comfortable with the review writing process one can begin to adopt other formats and styles, but I feel the above is a good way to start.
Reviews can be favorable or non-favorable towards the provider and her services. If you do not have a good session, tell us about it but do not flame or insult the provider, in a polite and civil way simply tell us why you were dissapointed; honesty and accuracy is what separates good reviews from bad reviews as well as White Knight reviews, quacks and ' sales 'adds.' Writing a review of a session that did not meet expectations is better than writing a long novel about a session where one is not completely honest or accurate or leaves the negatives out and only tells of the positives. No matter how good a writer is or how good a story looks, the review is only as good as the accuracy and honesty of the information. Guys benefit from reviews that are accurate and the ladies do as well. If one is not accurate, the ladies and the gents will simply be set up for failure as expectations will not be met because the reviewer portrayed the provider in a way she was not.
Before you submit the review, re-read it and ask yourself one question: " If I had never read a review or heard of this provider, is there enough quality information in the review to make an informed and educated decision on whether I would enjoy a session with this lady". If the answer is ' yes' than you have written a good review, if the answer is ' No' , ask yourself what is missing if you were the one reading the review and than you can go back and insert additional information so that you would be comfortable answering the above question with a ' yes.'
The following posts are examples of reviews to help get you started. Three of the reviews are of the same lady. One is not written properly and will be rejected for BCD credit, and I will provide an explanation below it why it would be rejected. The two other reviews of the same lady are written ' GFE Style', one a little more graphic than the other.
A review of a session that did not live up to expectations is also provided and finally I have included yet another writing style, an example of a review provided by GneissGuy that he included in his Austin ASPD FAQ thread.